Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... LastLast
    Results 161 to 180 of 300
    1. #161
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Piqua, Oh
      Posts
      397
      Country Flag: United States
      These fit nice and clear th Tru Turn
      http://www.summitracing.com/parts/DOU-D3337/
      Mike South
      1968 Camaro SS/RS LS1/T56
      Ride Tech Tru Turn, Ride Tech T/Q Coil-overs
      Ride Tech 4-link

    2. #162
      Join Date
      Dec 2011
      Location
      Elverson, PA
      Posts
      185
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks will add them to my shopping list.

    3. #163
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      USA
      Posts
      4,462
      Country Flag: United States
      I bought a set of Summit Brand ceramic coated headers .
      They clear the Tru Turn steering linkage just fine .
      Jeff Tate
      U.S.A.
      "The best thing about participating in these events is that you get to hang out with a group of intelligent like minded people who live to achieve things in their lives. You won't find a lazy, mean, or dumb bone in their bodies." Bret Voelkel, RideTech

    4. #164
      Join Date
      Dec 2011
      Location
      Elverson, PA
      Posts
      185
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by jb@ridetech View Post
      Here are some image of the TRUTurn system on the 48HOURCAMARO.
      I know there has been some questions on LS oil pan clearance and also tire fitment.










      Was the motor located in the stock location and not shifted towards the firewall? I plan to use the Holley oil pan on my LS and want to make sure it clears on my 69.

      Thanks

      Jason

    5. #165
      Join Date
      Oct 2011
      Posts
      95
      Country Flag: United States
      Has anyone used the true-turn with dynatech headers on an ls2 68 firebird?

    6. #166
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      That should be fine, from what I see the problem is with SBC headers. Most LSx headers feature the swept back pri pipe design.
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    7. #167
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Posts
      1,747
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm going to order a set of spindles once I get the answer to this: What was the seal solution with using the ridetech spindle with Wilwood hubs? My car has their 12.19 front kit with DynaPro 6 calipers. I'm going to "try" to setup my car with the preexisting Hotchkis TVS parts...1.5" drop already so I'm going to need to space the coil spring to offset some of the extra drop in the spindle. Looking at a .5" spacer made by SPC.

      Thanks!!!
      GeoffP
      68 Camaro - LS1/T-56

    8. #168
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      Jasper,IN
      Posts
      540
      From what I understand the problem was with the direction in which the seal was installed.

    9. #169
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Posts
      1,747
      Country Flag: United States
      I thought there was a different part number seal that didn't have a flanged lip so it could be installed backwards? I am not sure but I think the seals that came with my hubs are flanged where they can't be installed backwards. I will have to disassemble one to see though since I did it 2-3 years ago.
      GeoffP
      68 Camaro - LS1/T-56

    10. #170
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Posts
      1,747
      Country Flag: United States
      I ordered anyway through Jegs - gonna give them a try. I wanted to buy the whole Tru Turn kit but $$$ just won't allow that right now. Hopefully I can buy the rest of the pieces this time next year! It should still be a big improvement over the stock spindle...can't wait to get my baby back on the road with the new LS1/T56.
      GeoffP
      68 Camaro - LS1/T-56

    11. #171
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      Jasper,IN
      Posts
      540
      Good deal. If you have any questioins just let us know. Thanks!

    12. #172
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      IL
      Posts
      586
      Country Flag: United States
      Just wondering if I can use the Tru Turn with the DSE coil over conversion set up? I have not installed them but I am getting ready to so if it won't then I need to change a few things. I'm sure you can't tell for sure but if you know that it is a bad idea. Thanks for the help.
      Rick

    13. #173
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      Jasper,IN
      Posts
      540
      Haven't tried it yet.

    14. #174
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      1,371
      Quote Originally Posted by BadRS69 View Post
      Just wondering if I can use the Tru Turn with the DSE coil over conversion set up? I have not installed them but I am getting ready to so if it won't then I need to change a few things. I'm sure you can't tell for sure but if you know that it is a bad idea. Thanks for the help.
      As Darren said, we have not specifically tried that combination, but I don't see why there would be a problem. I assume that you are talking about the DSE system that cuts out the oem upper shock mount and inserts a bracket to use an eye mount shock instead of the stud mount shock like we use? As long as teh oem upper control arm location is not molested you should be fine.

      Bret Voelkel
      Director of Innovation Fox Powered Vehicles Group
      Founder/ Former Owner
      RideTech/Air Ride Technologies, Inc.

      How do you spell Impossible?


    15. #175
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      Jasper,IN
      Posts
      540
      Ah, i thought you were referring to using their arms and such. If it's just the upper shock mount that changed then it shoulddn't be a problem.

    16. #176
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      IL
      Posts
      586
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by bret View Post
      As Darren said, we have not specifically tried that combination, but I don't see why there would be a problem. I assume that you are talking about the DSE system that cuts out the oem upper shock mount and inserts a bracket to use an eye mount shock instead of the stud mount shock like we use? As long as teh oem upper control arm location is not molested you should be fine.
      Quote Originally Posted by darren@ridetech View Post
      Ah, i thought you were referring to using their arms and such. If it's just the upper shock mount that changed then it shoulddn't be a problem.
      Cool, yes just the upper shock mount. Well it is the upper control arm and shock mount. Other then that I want to use the rest of the Ride Tech Tru Turn set up. How do go about measuring for the Ride Tech shocks, I want to run the on all 4 corners? Also what did you use on the 48 hour Camaro for the upper shock mount? Thanks guys!
      Rick

    17. #177
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Cincinnati Ohio
      Posts
      1,060
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by bret View Post
      As Darren said, we have not specifically tried that combination, but I don't see why there would be a problem. I assume that you are talking about the DSE system that cuts out the oem upper shock mount and inserts a bracket to use an eye mount shock instead of the stud mount shock like we use? As long as teh oem upper control arm location is not molested you should be fine.
      Bret you are talking about the ATS upper mount, i have that on my nova. The DSE upper mount set up, you cut the factory upper a arm mount off and install a new upper control arm mount. The new DSE mount holes are dropped about 5/8 or 3/4". so with the upper control arm mount dropped and tall spindle wont you have a bunch of neg camber gain?

      ATS upper mount
      Name:  5_22_11_004.sized.jpg
Views: 1914
Size:  68.9 KB

      DSE upper mount
      Name:  6_16_020.sized.jpg
Views: 2626
Size:  65.1 KB

      As for DSE control arms. i have DSE control arms,ATS upper coilover mount with the tru turn, but i had DSE coilovers(double adjustable, and to fit them i had to modify them) and switched to ridetech coilovers(and when i went to ridetech's i had to make new spacers)

      If you dont have control arms and your looking at the tru turn, just buy the Ridetech arms, then everything is made to work together. I had the arms and made them work.
      1972 Nova Ridetech, Forgeline, Falken Tires, Wilwood, Bowler Performance Transmission, Lingenfelter Performance Engineering.

    18. #178
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Location
      CT
      Posts
      782
      Country Flag: United States
      This looks like a great product and an easy way to upgrade my factory spindles. Is there a template available to verify fitment with headers? I am running a gen1 SBC with the Headmen Hustler 1 7/8" primary tubes and was concerned about fitment.

      Thanks
      ________________
      Nick S.
      Gold/Gray 1967 Camaro

    19. #179
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Central FL
      Posts
      1,231
      Quote Originally Posted by nicks67camaro View Post
      This looks like a great product and an easy way to upgrade my factory spindles. Is there a template available to verify fitment with headers? I am running a gen1 SBC with the Headmen Hustler 1 7/8" primary tubes and was concerned about fitment.

      Thanks
      From the pictures I've seen, if the headers are farther back than the drop in the oil pan, you're PROBABLY safe. Mine should be here this week, I plan to review it and give some measurements to help identify what headers will fit if one of the ridetech guys don't beat me to it.
      Dan
      1968 Camaro v2
      LS6 :: Viper T56 :: C5 Brakes :: Hotchkis Suspension


    20. #180
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Posts
      1,747
      Country Flag: United States
      What learned installing the ridetech spindles last night:

      1. For Wilwood brakes - make sure you kept the upper brake bracket spacer and the longer bolt supplied in your Wilwood kit. You'll need it!
      2. Turning the seal backwards is mandatory. In fact, looking at my factory spindles, I probably should've turned it backwards for them too. It was sealing right at the edge of the sealing surface.
      3. Fit and finish are great! I had ZERO problems.

      Also, I wanted to say thanks for including the necessary bolts and cotter pins to make the swap. This small detail made all the difference in the world. I was most especially pleased to see a bolt in the bag for the adapter bracket meant for Wilwood and Baer brake setups. Thanks ridetech - you guys definitely have my future business for suspension parts!

      One last thing - how about producing a lower strong arm for 1st gen Camaros that uses the factory style spring? I want to keep my Hotchkis springs - I'm not a fan of coil overs (maybe I can be convinced otherwise but not right now).

      Thanks!!
      GeoffP
      68 Camaro - LS1/T-56

    Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com