Results 301 to 320 of 376
Thread: 1967 GTO project thread
-
02-09-2016 #301
I got my rear axle reinstalled and filled, watts link in and angles correct, new tank in place, new gas lines made, new brake lines made and bled. Looks like the back end part of my winter work is done! On to the middle of the car where we will be adding a driveshaft loop, reworking the exhaust with some Dougs headers, V band clamps and an O2 bung on the collectors and a little bit of rework on the pipes themselves!
A couple notes on the Watts Link.
-The Watts was kind of a pain in the ass to install. It wasn't horrible but it wasn't a 2 hour install like I expected. This wasn't because of the watts setup itself but because I had to move the axle vent, grind the rear sway bar mounts to fit over the speedway type housing on my Moser 9", I had it re powder coated since it was bright red and I hated the color and I ended up having Jim @ Fays 2 send me 11" watts bars as opposed to the 9" ones he sent. The instructions were generic but pretty decent, Marc@SC&C was a big help and Jim@Fays2 also answered his phone any time I called. Excellent customer service out of these guys.
-On a very bright note I found that a modified gas tank was not necessary at all in my 67 GTO. The reason I mention this is because the instructions and even Marc @ SC&C thought I was going to need a 69 Nova tank. I mocked it up with a 1967 stock gas tank and used a tanks inc 1967 GTO gas tank. I think the warnings on this install about using a Nova tank are possibly aimed at Chevelles. I'm guessing that the Chevelle has a shorter rear trunk area and that the tank is mounted closer to the rear axle making a short tank necessary though that is 100% speculation. So if you have a 67 GTO and are thinking about the watts but the gas tank issue has you questioning it, I didn't need a different tank.
Heres a couple pics!




You can see here where the swaybar mount had to be ground out on one side to make it all fit and its still tight.
-Nick
-1967 GTO I drive and race
-Build threads:
-http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=615847&page=23
-https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...project-thread

-
02-09-2016 #302-Nick
-1967 GTO I drive and race
-Build threads:
-http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=615847&page=23
-https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...project-thread

02-12-2016 #303Since the back end is pretty much done im starting in on my exhaust project. On the off chance someone here is going to run a traditional Pontiac in their old 64-67 poncho, I did a little compare and contrast on a common debate amongst Pontiac guys. D port headers for a 64-67 A body Pontiac. Dougs vs Super comp
There's always been a debate about what headers are best for the 64-67 A body D port crowd. Hooker Super Comps or Dougs. Since I have both on hand I thought id snap a few pics of them side by side for a compare and contrast.
My analysis: The Dougs win by a very wide margin in every category
-More room for bolts, especially on the center ports
-Much tighter to the floor/better ground clearance which is big for me running auto X
-Though both sets of headers I had were used the Dougs had the better finish quality and they were used far more than the super comps I bought
-Install went far easier than the old hooker removal. By that I mean it required far less horsing around with a floor jack moving the car up and down. In fact I only had to use the floor jack one time for about 1/16" of movement on the drivers side, jacking the engine up with the driver side motor mount bolt out.
IMO this is a dead topic now. The Dougs win hands down. The Dougs are the clean headers, super comps are the dirty headers.



-Nick
-1967 GTO I drive and race
-Build threads:
-http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=615847&page=23
-https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...project-thread

02-14-2016 #304



Reply With Quote