Help me understand...

[JRouche]

You know whats weird is you didnt get as much camber gain (not always a good thing, more is not always better) as I thought you would by shaving 1.5" off the UCAs. I would have expected to see more of a dive, a fast dive in camber than the program shows. 1.5" off the top should have shown a massive camber gain, specially at the 2 inches of dive.

Which means one of maybe more things. One is the stock suspension didnt have ANY camber gain due to the car and it didnt need it and tire wear was more important. Or two, the software isnt giving proper numbers. Ok, or three is that the arms are so long that 1.5" is not that big of a deal. They would have to be pretty long. And no doubt, they prolly are.

Im thinking number three, massive arms and one and a half inches is petty.

So with all that. Just going off of the computer output I dont see an issue. Id like to set it up on my caster/camber gauge to see the real numbers. Kinda hard for me to see removing 1.5" out of the top doesnt create more of a change.

But.. With that full degree of toe makes me think the program is seeing the changes. The toe numbers are a lil high, and they should be with the short upper arm. And that would be due to the 1.5" of upper arm. Thats ALOT of toe change. But not something you couldn't correct for. Thats kinda simple. If the camber and caster numbers are correct then I think its doable. Just gotta mellow the toe out some. JR