Results 1 to 13 of 13
Threaded View
-
01-14-2010 #7
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Elk River, MN
- Posts
- 676
Well, to have a negative camber gain, the UCA needs to be level or angled slightly upward with the LCA level, with an UCA that is shorter than the LCA. At stock ride height with stock arms, you're correct, the camber gain is positive, since the UCA's are angled slightly downward. By lengthening the LCA and keeping UCA stock length, it will increase my negative camber gain. Anywho, I'll have to look into what gain rate is most attractive for my application, I can tweak it later if my UCA brackets are made to be adjustable.
Thanks for the heads-up with the interference issues, I'll have to look it all over with the wheels I plan to run, they're 17's. With the LCA lengthened and a stock width S-bar, I'm hoping to have more than enough clearance, but I'll have to investigate to be sure. Measure twice, cut once as they say ;)
ETA: I am indeed focusing on PT with the car, drag racing doesn't appeal to me in the least.Matt Peterson 84 Monte Carlo - Sold :( | 99 Corvette Racecar | 2001 Z06 Daily Driver
https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ng-Bertha-Back
http://ls1tech.com/forums/conversions-hybrids/1499192-84-monte-5-3-build.html
https://www.pro-touring.com/threads/...rvette-Racecar
-
Tags for this Thread






Reply With Quote




