Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 20 of 132

    Threaded View

    1. #16
      Join Date
      Feb 2010
      Location
      El Segundo, CA
      Posts
      268
      Country Flag: United States
      Here is another screen capture from the Suspension Analyzer software. It shows how my current design behaves under 3° roll and 0.7" of rack movement (steering input). See the numbers I've outlined in Green:





      This is where the effects of caster come into play. In one way it is possible to think of caster as inducing "dynamic camber". With 11° of caster, and with the wheels turned to the left some 10°, the outside front tire is still at -2° camber, even though the chassis has rolled 3° to the outside. The plus side of this effect is that you can run less static negative camber. This would help with braking and tire wear. But too much caster has negative effects also. Heavy steering due to increased trail is one such effect. Ron Sutton mentions some of the other side effects in his excellent suspension summaries.





    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com