Results 381 to 400 of 546
Thread: Getting closer........
-
04-24-2010 #381
Detonation is much more of a timing issue than purely compression -- obviously with more compression - the timing becomes ever more critical.
I once did a dyno demo where we messed with AF ratios to see what they would do to the overall power... Way fat and lean - made VERY VERY little difference in the power - but 2 Degrees of timing either way was HUGE.
I agree with the other poster about HEAT and aluminum heads... There's kind of an old adage (not that old!) about 1 point of compression for running aluminum over iron - and 1 point more for EFI over a carb etc. So a modern EFI aluminum head can run some serious compression and live... compared to the old style iron head carb motor. Having said that - there's many "white papers" discussing the power difference of "same motor" - compression vs power made... and compression is important - but 1/2 a point or so is not as big a deal as we would like it to be. I've learned - as many here have - that the CAM is important when mated to the compression... in other words CYLINDER PRESSURE... take a lame ass 9:1 motor - with too large of a cam - and you have zippola for power... as it (the cam) bleeds off cylinder pressure. Different cam - wake the motor up and it'll run just fine... so full circle -- it's all about the TOTAL COMBINATION.
-
04-24-2010 #382
Jim, my understanding is that 9:1 cast iron heads replaced with similar aluminum requires 10:1. Aluminum needs more heat to make the same power. Flow means something, but not everything (at all). I'd guess in your build velocity is more important, as is the port design. In any case, without sufficient heat you may be unhappy. Aluminum needs heat. Low cylinder compression with a good cam and aluminum heads may well lead to a loss of power without any reliability gain. I would personally never run less than 10:1 compression with decent aluminum heads.
I can sure understand you being a bit shy right now after just having a motor grenade on you, but to me it's LOTS easier to make a good estimate of static compression, build the heads/slugs that way, and try it. You'll quickly know. If you decide you want to then reduce compression, it's way easier to pull the heads, send them to a good shop to have a few cc's milled out of the chambers and you're done. If you start with too low compression, it's a far more difficult process.
-
04-24-2010 #383
All other things equal I'd go with 10-1 with aluminum heads in a heartbeat, before the less compression iron heads. They would both run on the same gas. The aluminum headed one should make more power, and weigh less!
Frank B. 1968 Camaro 355 Procharged 6 speed. 1983 V8 S10. 1984 Monte Carlo Magnusen Charged iron 6.0. Plus a few other junkers!
-
04-24-2010 #384



Reply With Quote