Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 25
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      826

      JKnight16's 69 GTO

      This is my dad's car but we're working together to get this thing looking and driving right for Hot August Nights this year. Anyhow, we got the 17's from Jon at DriverzInc. mounted up (225/50-17 in front, 275/45?-17 rear) and it really revealed how high the front of this car sits right now. So we need some assistance from you GTO or A-body guys.

      The rear springs are OEM replacements for a tempest wagon, so they likely sit a bit higher than normal, higher spring rate, but we don't know what the front springs are, except that they're fairly old. We're thinking these fronts may be even taller than stock, but aren't sure. Either way, we're looking at replacing all four springs with some eibachs or hotchkis lowering springs, but we're a little concerned that even that won't get the front end low enough. What has your experience been with lowering springs on an a-body? how did yours compare to the pic below? The rest of the suspension is stock.

      (Oh, and don't worry about the rear drums, the Wilwoods are on the way from Frank!)

      Thanks for your input guys.


      Edit: For comparison, this is after installing SPC springs and Stage 2+ system from Marcus at SC&C


      Jeff K.
      69 Camaro SS, 406 SBC, TKO600, 9" w/3.73 tru-trac, Speedtech Arms, AFX Spindles, Lee 670 Box, Baer GT front, C5Z rear. Hyperco Leafs w/ Fays2 Watts Link + Varishocks.


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Posts
      478
      I would cut a coil out all the way around or you may just start with 1/2 a coil and and go from there. You can take a die grinder and a cutoff wheel and it will slice it right off. I doubt a hack saw will do much.

      In the rear, you will need to make sure once you get it where you want it, that the shocks are short enough not to let the rear drop enough to let the coil fall out. If so you will need to make a limiter or get some shorter shocks. Min 67 is lowered 3" and Edelbrock IAS shocks were just short enough to make it.

      I cut my front springs a full coil and that was just about right, but that put the car about 3" lower than factory. That is lowwwww. For the rear I used OPG 3" lowering spring because my springs are double pigtail. If your are just single pigtail, you can just trim them in the back.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      826
      Just to clarify, so you're talking about buying the new springs and then cutting them a half a coil, maybe a full coil?

      So you guys out there that have used aftermarket springs on your A-bodies, is this similar to what yours looked like w/ factory springs? How much did yours change with the aftermarket springs installed?
      Jeff K.
      69 Camaro SS, 406 SBC, TKO600, 9" w/3.73 tru-trac, Speedtech Arms, AFX Spindles, Lee 670 Box, Baer GT front, C5Z rear. Hyperco Leafs w/ Fays2 Watts Link + Varishocks.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Location
      Thehoodstock,GA
      Posts
      793
      Country Flag: United States
      _That_ is a tough looking car. Can't wait to see it lowered.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Washington, MO
      Posts
      2,363
      Look into OPG springs. The should offer a 1, 2 and 3" drop versions. I went with 3" drops in the front and 2" in the rear for my Malibu and am happy with the results.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The City of Fountains
      Posts
      16,129
      Country Flag: United States
      Call Mark:

      http://www.scandc.com/

      By far the best customer service in the business. He should be able to set you up with everything you need to get the ride height nailed down. Also keep in mind that when you lower the back you will run into driveline angle issues. If you don't already have adjustable upper control arms, you will need them.

      Andrew
      1970 GTO Version 3.0
      1967 Cougar build
      GM High-Tech Performance feature
      My YouTube Channel Please Subscribe!
      Instagram @dr__efi
      I deliver what EFI promises.
      Remote Holley EFI tuning.
      Please get in touch if I can be of service.

      "You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets." ~ Her

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      PA.
      Posts
      935
      Country Flag: United States
      Hi jknight16. I just talked to your Dad on the phone. Nice Judge, it sure is too high though. Cutting springs will get it lower but it won`t add much rate at all which may make the car prone to bottoming out. It also won`t do anything for performance. A good set of performance lowering springs would be a much better bet. They`ll lower the car a set amount and add enough spring rate to improve performance and keep it from bottoming out. If it`s in the budget you can also lower the car some while improving the geometry, drivability and performance a LOT. Our Stage 2-Plus package is a great example. The tall lower ball joints will lower the car about 3/4" in addition to it`s bumpsteer and suspension geometry improvements. Mark SC&C

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      826
      Thanks for your help Marcus. Yeah, the car has been very nicely restored to original condition, but he's bored with stock and I've been trying to point him in the right direction to get it to handle and stop better.

      Yeah, I told him you were the guy to call, I'm glad he did. I've never been a proponent of cutting springs so we were definitely looking to go the route of aftermarket lowering springs. I didn't even know that SPC made springs for these cars, but from what he said that's what you guys are recommending now. Good to know.

      I think right now he's leaning toward doing the springs, shocks, and ball joints, but he's probably going to leave the stock control arms for now. He may get into that in a few months.

      Jeff
      Jeff K.
      69 Camaro SS, 406 SBC, TKO600, 9" w/3.73 tru-trac, Speedtech Arms, AFX Spindles, Lee 670 Box, Baer GT front, C5Z rear. Hyperco Leafs w/ Fays2 Watts Link + Varishocks.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Posts
      137
      Quote Originally Posted by Marcus SC&C
      Hi jknight16. I just talked to your Dad on the phone. Nice Judge, it sure is too high though. Cutting springs will get it lower but it won`t add much rate at all which may make the car prone to bottoming out. It also won`t do anything for performance. A good set of performance lowering springs would be a much better bet. They`ll lower the car a set amount and add enough spring rate to improve performance and keep it from bottoming out. If it`s in the budget you can also lower the car some while improving the geometry, drivability and performance a LOT. Our Stage 2-Plus package is a great example. The tall lower ball joints will lower the car about 3/4" in addition to it`s bumpsteer and suspension geometry improvements. Mark SC&C
      Just finished up using one of Marks SC&C suspension packages on a 68 cutlass ....... great service highly reccomended

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      826
      Steady progress is being made on getting the Judge lowered. While he was at it, the Dad is taking the necessary steps to make it stop and turn a little better.

      Stage 2+ kit from Marcus at SC&C, which includes the Tall upper and lower ball joints and SPC upper control arms. Along with SPC springs, Bilstein shocks, along with hotchkis tie rod adjusters and new tie rods (not shown).


      And Wilwood brakes from Frank at Prodigy/GP Superstore.


      Rear suspension and brakes in progress.
      Jeff K.
      69 Camaro SS, 406 SBC, TKO600, 9" w/3.73 tru-trac, Speedtech Arms, AFX Spindles, Lee 670 Box, Baer GT front, C5Z rear. Hyperco Leafs w/ Fays2 Watts Link + Varishocks.

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      826
      It's update time again. (guess we could probably move this to the updates section, mods?) In the first post, I've inserted the 'after' picture below the 4x4 picture so that you can see the change. This is after they got the springs, brakes, and the remainder of the stage 2+ kit installed and got the car back down on all fours. Only problem now is that the front end is resting on the bumpstops. We're thinking that a couple of spring spacers will likely be used to remedy that though.... They're still working through a few kinks with the brakes (rears don't seem to be working at all, and fronts aren't doing much work either) but hopefully that will be resolved with the new booster (we suspected this booster was bad with the original brakes) and removing the factory hold-off valves (round one below the master cylinder and the brass one along the frame).




      Jeff K.
      69 Camaro SS, 406 SBC, TKO600, 9" w/3.73 tru-trac, Speedtech Arms, AFX Spindles, Lee 670 Box, Baer GT front, C5Z rear. Hyperco Leafs w/ Fays2 Watts Link + Varishocks.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Location
      So Cal
      Posts
      263
      Looks nice. I like the LIC. Plate also.
      Tom
      1969 Chevelle

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Jackson Ms
      Posts
      1,220
      that car is on the dream car list!!!
      Chris V
      SOLD


    14. #14
      Join Date
      Jun 2007
      Location
      Dayton Ohio
      Posts
      1,283
      I'm running the full Hotchkis setup on my 68 front didnt come down much rear came down ALOT we have a 2inch perch in (though I'm going to switch out to a 1 inch so we will see

      I'm really surprised the front didnt come down more with the hotchkis

      but I'll get everything straightened out on my setup


      but yours looks great in this pic


    15. #15
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Washington, MO
      Posts
      2,363
      Very nice... Love the plate too.

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      826
      Thanks for the compliments guys. We were joking today about how he might not get any awards at car shows anymore since it won't be eligible for the stock classes anymore. But we're both of the opinion that the improvements are worth far more than the trophies.
      Jeff K.
      69 Camaro SS, 406 SBC, TKO600, 9" w/3.73 tru-trac, Speedtech Arms, AFX Spindles, Lee 670 Box, Baer GT front, C5Z rear. Hyperco Leafs w/ Fays2 Watts Link + Varishocks.

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Posts
      543
      Sweet looking Judge.
      68 and 69 are my favorite years for those GTO's. 70 & 71 aren't too bad neither.

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Chicago
      Posts
      355
      Country Flag: United States
      Love the car , I think thats the best license plate I've seen yet!
      Tony L

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Jul 2008
      Location
      Camp Pendleton, Ca
      Posts
      10
      Country Flag: United States
      Nice Judge, one of my all time favorite cars!

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Jun 2008
      Location
      Carol Stream, IL
      Posts
      586
      Country Flag: United States
      Love the license plates! Fit the car great! Car looks much better lowered now too

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com