Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
    Results 21 to 28 of 28

    Thread: Ridler 652

    1. #21
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Posts
      168
      Math is hard!



    2. #22
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,874
      Country Flag: United States
      6.5 - .5 = 6
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    3. #23
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Posts
      168
      I'm going to take some measurements tomorrow. I have the body off the frame so can't check the fender clearance, but I can see what it looks like to the frame and suspension.
      Maybe i could run those 9.5's with the 5.25" BS and use a 265/35 tire. That would be almost half an inch narrower than a 275/35.
      Also my factory front inner fenders are pretty rough, so I wouldn't mind doing some modifications to them to help gain some clearance.

    4. #24
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,874
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by gtome View Post
      I'm going to take some measurements tomorrow. I have the body off the frame so can't check the fender clearance, but I can see what it looks like to the frame and suspension.
      Maybe i could run those 9.5's with the 5.25" BS and use a 265/35 tire. That would be almost half an inch narrower than a 275/35.
      Also my factory front inner fenders are pretty rough, so I wouldn't mind doing some modifications to them to help gain some clearance.
      Fender clearance will be your issue with those wheels and backspacing. You will likely be contacting the wheel lip unless you run a lot of negative camber or your ride height is sky high.
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    5. #25
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Posts
      168
      Bummer. Oh well, I guess an 8" it is. Not a huge deal really. I was just hoping to have a wider wheel so I had the option of running a 275 out front if I wanted.

    6. #26
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Posts
      168
      Put a 275/35/18 on the frame today. Just to get an idea what I was looking at. This one is a 9.5" with 6" BS.
      Turns out I don't love the wheel with that much back space. From most angles you can't even tell the tire is wide. This is the car I pulled the wheel from.
      Name:  20241021_165820.jpg
Views: 327
Size:  448.4 KBName:  20241021_183018.jpg
Views: 347
Size:  610.3 KB

    7. #27
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Posts
      168
      Well 305's for the rear aren't looking possible either. Like I said I have the body off the frame for another week or so, so I can't get a super accurate measurement. I bent a 12" wide aluminum rod today to simulate a tire. I was hoping to run the wheel just to the bottom of the high part of the rear wheel openings. In that scenario, it looks like i would only have 2-3" of travel before it would hit. I can massage the outer wheelhouse some, but I don't know if I would get enough to make it worth it.

    8. #28
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Posts
      168
      The 305/35r20 is super tight in there. I may try to roll the lip and see what that gains me.
      The first one is about where I want it for rife height, and the second is about where it hits the lip. Not more than 2" of travel there.
      Name:  20241031_183039.jpg
Views: 319
Size:  324.2 KB
      Name:  20241031_182524.jpg
Views: 291
Size:  384.4 KB

    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com