Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 11 of 11
    1. #1
      Join Date
      May 2017
      Location
      Sacramento, California
      Posts
      40

      Pinto -- Move engine back or front wheels forward

      I have a 71 Pinto, and was planning to make a roadracer out of it.
      I see a basic problem with these cars is the engine is located very far forward relative to the front wheels.
      Particularly if I go with the 5.0 iron v8, i don't want this much weight up front.



      I could cut the firewall and move the engine much further back, which is my first thought, but then I plan to replace
      the front suspension with that from a Rav4, which has 12 inch disk brakes and 5-lugs, and thought why not relocate the front wheels.
      I can redo the fender bodywork no problem, and this seems easier than creating a new firewall, which can be more problematic
      for tech inspection.

      Any opinions or something I haven't thought about?
      I realize the firewall can be moved back a lot further than the wheels can go forward, so that leans to the firewall direction. Of course I could do both..

      Here is the front wheels moved forward about 8 inches.Name:  1971-Ford-Pinto-Trans-Am-side-moved.jpg
Views: 2110
Size:  173.1 KB


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jun 2012
      Location
      South Lyon, MI
      Posts
      1,244
      Country Flag: United States
      I am doing both. I moved the front wheels forward 2 inches and the motor back 4inches. I guess I’m undecided. Both work. I would still set the engine back in the Pinto whether or not you move the front wheel. Unless you move them forward dramatically like a foot or so like this Monza.

      Name:  847FB738-DD58-4ED0-99E9-D787EB607F1E.jpeg
Views: 940
Size:  23.4 KB

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Lawrenceburg, TN
      Posts
      4,098
      Country Flag: United States
      a shorter wheel based car handles well on the autocross and longer wheel base handles the road course better, corvettes do well on both so that's the wheel base I wanted to be close to, the wheel base on the car I built for suzy was 100 inches close to a corvette so for me it was move the motor back for better weight balance, and I ended up with 49/51

      Name:  SEMA-2017-8463.jpg
Views: 6014
Size:  234.1 KB

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The City of Fountains
      Posts
      16,120
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by nimblemotorsports View Post
      I have a 71 Pinto, and was planning to make a roadracer out of it.
      I see a basic problem with these cars is the engine is located very far forward relative to the front wheels.
      Particularly if I go with the 5.0 iron v8, i don't want this much weight up front.

      I could cut the firewall and move the engine much further back, which is my first thought, but then I plan to replace
      the front suspension with that from a Rav4, which has 12 inch disk brakes and 5-lugs, and thought why not relocate the front wheels.
      I can redo the fender bodywork no problem, and this seems easier than creating a new firewall, which can be more problematic
      for tech inspection.

      Any opinions or something I haven't thought about?
      I realize the firewall can be moved back a lot further than the wheels can go forward, so that leans to the firewall direction. Of course I could do both..

      Here is the front wheels moved forward about 8 inches.Name:  1971-Ford-Pinto-Trans-Am-side-moved.jpg
Views: 2110
Size:  173.1 KB
      I like the way this looks and this build is screaming for a 2.3L EcoBoost engine.

      Andrew
      1970 GTO Version 3.0
      1967 Cougar build
      GM High-Tech Performance feature
      My YouTube Channel Please Subscribe!
      Instagram @dr__efi
      I deliver what EFI promises.
      Remote Holley EFI tuning.
      Please get in touch if I can be of service.

      "You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets." ~ Her

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Los Angeles
      Posts
      592
      Country Flag: United States
      I moved the engine back on one of the Pintos I built. I figured with a big lump it just made more sense to move the weight back.



      The rule is measure twice and cut once. My problem is I still measure with a mic and cut with an axe!

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      Minneapolis, MN
      Posts
      195
      Country Flag: United States
      The wheels moved forward give it a pretty cool look. I'd move the wheels forward, and the firewall back however much is needed to fit your engine choice. An ecoboost 3.5L V6 might fit nicely too, with the V6 being a little shorter than the V8.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      May 2017
      Location
      Sacramento, California
      Posts
      40
      I think I have a plan to deal with the pinto weight distribution issue.. I acquired a 944 that can donate its transaxle setup for the pinto.
      This allows the engine in front but not have to push back the firewall too much, and by moving the front wheels forward, it should give
      pretty good weight distribution.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      Minneapolis, MN
      Posts
      195
      Country Flag: United States
      Good find on the transaxle! Was thinking about that with C5 parts, but tougher suspension to alter. 944 should work sweet. The car still would look great with the wheels moved forward.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      May 2017
      Location
      Sacramento, California
      Posts
      40
      Quote Originally Posted by Protour_Pinto View Post
      I moved the engine back on one of the Pintos I built. I figured with a big lump it just made more sense to move the weight back.
      My 63 Falcon I did something similiar, entire floor and firewall was cut out and redone in sheet metal, I had stroked 460 in it.
      That is a lot of work, more than I want to invest in this Pinto, which is a $500 project.

      How did you fit an intake in there? doesn't look like any room under the cowl area!

    10. #10
      Join Date
      May 2017
      Location
      Sacramento, California
      Posts
      40
      The Pinto has a 94 inch wheelbase, the C4 corvette is 96.2 The C4 also has rear wheel steering that helps a lot in parking lot racing I would think.
      The 944 has a 94.5 wheelbase. I'd of thought the pinto was even less. sure looks like it when I look at my C4 in comparison.



      Quote Originally Posted by Rod View Post
      a shorter wheel based car handles well on the autocross and longer wheel base handles the road course better, corvettes do well on both so that's the wheel base I wanted to be close to, the wheel base on the car I built for suzy was 100 inches close to a corvette so for me it was move the motor back for better weight balance, and I ended up with 49/51
      Name:  944side.jpg
Views: 805
Size:  90.5 KB

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jun 2012
      Location
      South Lyon, MI
      Posts
      1,244
      Country Flag: United States
      The 944 transplant idea should work great. Have you looked at http://www.renegadehybrids.com/ for adapters to mount the engine of your choice to the torque tube?

      The 944 has the differential in the front. The C5/6/7 has the differential in the rear. The 944 setup will fit much better in a Pinto where the Corvette setup might interfere with the seats.

      This sounds like it will be a cool project.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com