Results 21 to 23 of 23
Thread: Ride Height
-
04-28-2011 #21
Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Location
- state of confusion
- Posts
- 1,499
Not offended in the least.
Originally Posted by 63Duece
But I think when the height of the little space under the sills gets below some percentage of its length that the overall appearance has begun to get distorted, and the ratio of things like body side height to clearance doesn't look quite right. Sectioning and chopping the car can help, to a point.
I think a car has to at least look like it could function as transportation and not just exist as static sculpture (or a non-driveable concept car, if done by an OE).
Norm'08 GT coupe, 5M, suspension unstockish (the occasional track toy)
'19 WRX, Turbo-H4/6M (the family sedan . . . seriously)
Gone but not forgotten dep't:
'01 Maxima 20AE 5M, '10 LGT 6M, '95 626, V6/5M; '79 Malibu, V8/4M-5M; '87 Maxima, V6/5M; '72 Pinto, I4/4M; '64 Dodge V8/3A
-
04-28-2011 #22
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Elk River, MN
- Posts
- 676
Right, because being as low as the car can possibly be is priority #1 with a Pro-Touring car.... Originally Posted by 63Duece
-matt
Matt Peterson 84 Monte Carlo - Sold :( | 99 Corvette Racecar | 2001 Z06 Daily Driver
https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ng-Bertha-Back
http://ls1tech.com/forums/conversions-hybrids/1499192-84-monte-5-3-build.html
https://www.pro-touring.com/threads/...rvette-Racecar
-
05-18-2011 #23
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- UK London
- Posts
- 527
X2 ........ I just love low for both looks and centre of gravity........But after the first test drive I'm not going any lower!!! Originally Posted by monteboy84
2 1/2" Caltracs to tarmac!!!!!!
Last edited by Procharmo; 05-18-2011 at 11:29 AM. Reason: Additional info
Reply With Quote
