Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    View Poll Results: Manual or Power LS1 brakes on a 1966 Nova

    Voters
    46. You may not vote on this poll
    • Manual

      27 58.70%
    • Power

      19 41.30%
    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 24
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Western Kentucky
      Posts
      161
      Country Flag: United States

      Manual or Power LS1 Disc Brakes?

      I am installing the LS1 disc brakes on all 4 corners.

      I have a 1966 Nova.

      I am trying to decide between a manual or power setup.

      I was wondering what you all were using and how you like it.

      This is mostly a street drivin car that i would one day like to autocross as well.

      Also which master or master/booster is best?

    2. #2
      Join Date
      May 2009
      Location
      Connecticut
      Posts
      409
      Country Flag: United States
      Im looking at doing the same thing hopefully someone will chime in. Are manual brakes that much more responsive as far as feel goes?
      Aldin
      1969 Camaro (Weapon of Choice) in the works

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Location
      Massachusetts
      Posts
      133
      I asked a similar question a while back over on Lat-G and I got a lot of good feedback on manual brakes. My engine doesn't pull much vacuum, even with a canister, and I also don't like the looks of all the "extra stuff" that goes with my current power brake set-up.

      when I hopefully upgrade my set-up in the spring I will definitely be going to manual brakes. They gave me so much info on there that my head was spinning when they were done with me

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Western Kentucky
      Posts
      161
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Northeast Rod Run View Post
      I asked a similar question a while back over on Lat-G and I got a lot of good feedback on manual brakes. My engine doesn't pull much vacuum, even with a canister, and I also don't like the looks of all the "extra stuff" that goes with my current power brake set-up.

      when I hopefully upgrade my set-up in the spring I will definitely be going to manual brakes. They gave me so much info on there that my head was spinning when they were done with me
      do you have a link to that thread?

    5. #5
      Join Date
      May 2009
      Location
      Connecticut
      Posts
      409
      Country Flag: United States
      Heres a link to the lateral-g thread or one of them http://www.lateral-g.net/forums/show...t=power+brakes
      Aldin
      1969 Camaro (Weapon of Choice) in the works

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      bowling green,ky
      Posts
      845
      Country Flag: United States
      i am running them on my 69 camaro. running a 1" wilwood m/c w/ prop valve. they have a firm pedal but stop pretty well. i think i should of run a 7/8 m/c instead. for the money they are hard to beat, just make sure you have all the parts if you are buying a take off system

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Posts
      1,387
      Country Flag: United States
      I have manual, heard that the only negative is the force required to stop them time after can cause your leg to get pretty tired, so good will hunting. P.S I never like the look of a brake booster in my engine compartment
      68 Camaro RS twin turbo
      https://www.pro-touring.com/threads/...d-Intent-V-2-0

      1993 Toyota Supra 6768 Built Single Turbo


      Slow Lifted Jeep No TURBO :(

      Randal F

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Posts
      74
      Need to make sure you match mas cyl bore to calipers for best stopping power w/o killing your leg

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      Shawnee, KS
      Posts
      290
      I brought this thread back up from a few months ago......Will going to a 7/8" MC help with the pedal over the 1"? I have LS1 brakes on all 4 corners on my build.
      Shannon

      67 Camaro - Finally getting to BUILD it.

      Camaro Build -> HERE

      Our Drag boat blog and videos HERE

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      Waterloo, Ia
      Posts
      1,408
      I was told that running the LS1 brakes wouldnt work well with manual brakes. Are there a lot of you running them manually? What about with a 7/8" Wilwood master?
      -Nick
      -1967 GTO I drive and race
      -Build threads:
      -http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=615847&page=23
      -https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...project-thread


    11. #11
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Rural Retreat,VA
      Posts
      286
      use a 98 camaro booster and master cylinder and be done, hiting a car in the a$$ is not worth ur ride

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Posts
      345
      Quote Originally Posted by Novaguy73 View Post
      I was told that running the LS1 brakes wouldnt work well with manual brakes. Are there a lot of you running them manually? What about with a 7/8" Wilwood master?
      The 7/8" M/C is recommended with manual LS1 brakes. It properly matches the caliper piston area for the proper pressure.

      The other half of successful manual disc brakes is the proper pad compound. Need ones with a decent coefficient of friction. The Carbotech AX6, Wilwood BP20, EBC Blue or Green stuff all have a higher then normal-street-pad frictions.

      At a minimum use a FF rated pad. Such as GOOD semi-metallic store bought pad (NAPA, Car-Quest). As such the car here has PBR FF on the rear, and Stoptech FF on the fronts (StopTech Street Performance brake pads - front (D749) [63-309-0749]).

      Haven't driven it yet, but will be this Spring/Summer.

      Previously it had a 1" bore M/C (7/8" now) with no-name pads on the front and the PBRs on the rear. Took both feet on the pedal to even think about hauling it down. Scary doesn't even begin to describe how it was.

      Bob.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Location
      El Dorado Hills
      Posts
      1,645
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 69keith View Post
      use a 98 camaro booster and master cylinder and be done, hiting a car in the a$$ is not worth ur ride
      Just wanted to confirm, aren't '93-2002 boosters and m/c's compatible?

      Gaetano Cosentino
      Dont Drive Faster Than Your Angels Can Fly

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Feb 2009
      Location
      Long island, New York
      Posts
      668
      Quote Originally Posted by Gitter Dun View Post
      Just wanted to confirm, aren't '93-2002 boosters and m/c's compatible?
      ++1 ^^ interested as well, im running ls1 fronts and wanting to go to power.

      Dom Buffa
      69 Camaro- 2JZ /Garrett 67MM, Ls1 13" Front disc conversion, 18" ROH 3 piece Modenas




    15. #15
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Oregon
      Posts
      1,773
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 69projectKAOS View Post
      ++1 ^^ interested as well, im running ls1 fronts and wanting to go to power.
      The 1993-2002 F-body boosters are all the same part number. the master cylinders are different part numbers, however they're both 1" bore units and have the same port configuration, so they're interchangeable for all practical purposes.

      Tobin
      KORE3
      It's what I does.

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Posts
      345
      One difference in M/C's between '93 and '02 is the port fitting sizes for the lines. The change occurred when the LS1 engined vehicles were released (1998 ). Here is the info for the Camaro/Firebird (98-02) M/C:

      RH ports
      Bore Size: 1"
      Rod Cup: dimple
      Front port Size: M12 x 1 bubble flare
      Rear port Size: M11 x 1.5 bubble flare

      Note that RH ports mean that they exit toward the engine.

      Bob.

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Location
      Hermosa Beach, CA
      Posts
      153
      Country Flag: United States
      Power brakes are best, you said it yourself, its a street car first and foremost, 2011 Corvette has power brakes, how can you get better feel than that car? I'd rather not have to use both feet to stop the car when Im racing...
      Pete

      1968 Camaro
      2009 Porsche 911 Carrera S

      http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2543199

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Dec 2002
      Location
      Lost Wages, Nevada
      Posts
      2,684
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm lost... reading this thread. LS1 brakes ? There is no such thing...

      However, refering to OEM PBR floating calipers on a specific model year, would make this easier to digest.

      Now to the meat of the subject. Personally, I myself only run manul brakes for multiple reasons. But to hear someone say that the power brakes of a production car couldnt be any better... tells me that they obviously have very little experience in the true art of braking. Then the use of the two feet comment, come on now Pete... there is much more to that equation then what you have scantly described. Mostly related to likely component missmatching of the system you are reffering to in your comment.

      Reto fitting late model brakes into an early model chassis... has many variables, that will effect the systems performance. Nothing more importantly than a specific systems pressure to volume ratio that it was designed for. What that means in a lay mans term is, the proper line sizing, caliper volumes and master cylinder selection. Just taking a late model OEM PBR type caliper and bolting it onto an early model chassis with a 7/8ths master... is still a bandaid system. The specific pressure to volume ratios, associated to the specific equipment, havent even been addressed. That is where a lot of people get 'lost.' Yes it is somewhat close... but, it could be much, much better.

      Honestly, a properly designed manual ABS system is about as good as it can get. If not, a straight up manual system, designed correctly, is in a very close second.

      To answer Courseys specifics... I myself would run a manual set up, with 3/16" line for the front and rear systems and a 7/8" master. Utilizing these components will keep you much closer to the optimal pressure to volume ratios in which the system was designed to run with. This will also reduce the need for having to add additional proportioning beyond what should be required, without purchasing more components to make it work correctly. The secret to having an excellent brak system... is... to keep it simple, and do the 'math.'

      I ran an OEM iron four piston front on my 64 II with a 15/16" master only because I was still running the 1/4" line to the rear... but it worked pretty damn good with a set of Porterfield R-4S pads on it. I mean... it worked good enough to surprise many a 911 and many a M3 in the canyons of San Diego... and in the Murph on cone killing day.

      I will recommend to read the following: Linky

      This will give you some more to sponge in your quest of doing it right.

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Location
      Hermosa Beach, CA
      Posts
      153
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks Chicane67. You mention manual brakes are good for multiple reasons. Can you explain a bit more? what are the reasons?

      I see all sports cars with power brakes, Corvette, Porsche, Ferrari, etc. and I'm wondering why they use power? Is it strictly that it's "easier" or more user friendly? I can see why manual would be good for an all-out race car because it would most likely give you better pedal feel at the expense of pedal effort. But for a "mostly street driven car" that Coursey is describing wouldn't power brakes be much more enjoyable on a daily basis?

      If manual brakes were THAT MUCH better wouldn't sports car manufacturers be using them on production cars? Cars like the GT3? GT3 RS?
      Pete

      1968 Camaro
      2009 Porsche 911 Carrera S

      http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2543199

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Western Kentucky
      Posts
      161
      Country Flag: United States
      I went with a power setup.

      It works great. The car will stop on a dime now, and stays in a straight line while breaking, instead of heading for the ditch.

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com