Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 7 of 7
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      McKinney, TX
      Posts
      899
      Country Flag: United States

      fuel line limits

      I've been doing some research and it seems that everyone runs either 3/8" or 1/2" line. What I can't seem to track down is the reason for running one or the other. Obviously the 1/2 runs more fuel, but what are the limitations of 3/8?

      If I run 1/2 and it is "overkill" will will it have a negative effect?

      Thanks
      Confucius says, "Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life"

      My build Beast

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2008
      Location
      Pgh, PA
      Posts
      2,177
      No problems with overkill. The only thing 1/2" costs you is that it's a little more difficult to route hard lines in some places because of the extra OD, in stainless particularly it's tougher to bend, and it's a little more expensive. I honestly don't know the limitations of 3/8 myself, but was cautioned to run 1/2" in my build.

      '66 GTO Vert Project "Red Ink", 462ci of stroked pontiac power, TKO600, SC&C Stg II+, Tubular lowers, Currectrac Rear suspension, Moser 12bolt w/Truetrack, Wilwood Master and discs all around, too much fun for words...


    3. #3
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      McKinney, TX
      Posts
      899
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by wmhjr View Post
      No problems with overkill. The only thing 1/2" costs you is that it's a little more difficult to route hard lines in some places because of the extra OD, in stainless particularly it's tougher to bend, and it's a little more expensive. I honestly don't know the limitations of 3/8 myself, but was cautioned to run 1/2" in my build.
      Sounds like I'll be running 3/8. Thanks for the info.
      Confucius says, "Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life"

      My build Beast

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Dunwoody, GA
      Posts
      4,983
      Country Flag: United States
      3/8" is basically what the factory runs with LSx engines. I've built a few 500+ hp LSx engines and have no fuel supply issues using stock fuel lines and just an upgraded pump. Bill is correct though about the differences between them.
      Trey

      "The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese."
      ~ Jon Hammond

      1979 WS6 Trans Am stock LT1/T56 drive train out of my Formula. BMW M-parallel rims. C5/C6 brakes

      build thread https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ghlight=begins

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      san diego
      Posts
      5,101
      Country Flag: United States
      Flow is dependent on area and pressure.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Location
      Los Angeles, CA
      Posts
      1,303
      Double 1/2" lines will still fit, just takes some time mocking up and thinking about it. Even 5/8" will fit least will before the axle:






      Stainless is harder to bend, but just requires a good bender (Rigid).

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Mar 2010
      Location
      Alabama
      Posts
      549
      Country Flag: United States
      Yes 5/8" will still fit because I am running dual 5/8" lines on my 67 camaro blow-thru application.I would recommend on going with 1/2" and the reason I say this is for future need. If you ever need to go up with fuel volume then you will have the correct line size without changing. That is just my opinion.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com