Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
    Results 41 to 60 of 72
    1. #41
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      167
      Quote Originally Posted by 1nkred1ble View Post
      http://www.detroitspeed.com/productp...oilovr-kit.htm

      this is the set youre talking about right?
      That's it, except I have the full Speed Kit 3 as well.

      http://www.detroitspeed.com/productp...ar-spd-kts.htm
      Bob
      Mooresville, NC
      '66 Chevelle SS (461, T-56)
      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/vb...?do=view&g=274

    2. #42
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      167
      Quote Originally Posted by gearheads78 View Post
      I already said it once but its worth repeating. The new combo on your car took it from already incredible to absolutly perfect.
      If I didn't say so before, thanks very much. They're never really done, but I think (hope!) I'm getting close.
      Bob
      Mooresville, NC
      '66 Chevelle SS (461, T-56)
      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/vb...?do=view&g=274

    3. #43
      Join Date
      Mar 2006
      Location
      Sunny Florida on the Suncoast
      Posts
      1,060
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 1nkred1ble View Post
      thanks for that reply, but is there anyway you could translate that to a car newbie???? lol i tried fallowing what you where saying but you got wayyyyy tooooo technical for me, this is the first car ive ever tried to work on, so its kinda of hard to fallow you.
      i really appreciate the help though if it wasent for you and the rest of the guys chiming in i would even more lost that i am now.
      If you look at how the lower shock mount is just a 1/2 fine thread stud that goes through a piece of maybe 5/32 formed sheet metal, then it become obvious that it was never intended to hold any weight. When a coilover style shock is used it will be in tab on each side of the shock bushing mount, this puts the mounting bolt in double sheer. In some cases the bolt will be more than 1/2" diameter or of a higher grade than 8.



      A great book to read for this kind of stuff is Prepare to Win, it is about how to mount pieces and hardware in the building and maintaining of a race car. The book gets a bit technical but most can make it through.....heck I did.
      Stay in it till you see God....then lift

      Where patience fails, force prevails

      "When you're born, you get a ticket to the freak show. When you're born in America, you get a front-row seat." G. Carlin

      Stapp's Ironical Paradox...... "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."


    4. #44
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      157
      Quote Originally Posted by 406 Q-ship View Post
      If you look at how the lower shock mount is just a 1/2 fine thread stud that goes through a piece of maybe 5/32 formed sheet metal, then it become obvious that it was never intended to hold any weight. When a coilover style shock is used it will be in tab on each side of the shock bushing mount, this puts the mounting bolt in double sheer. In some cases the bolt will be more than 1/2" diameter or of a higher grade than 8.

      A great book to read for this kind of stuff is Prepare to Win, it is about how to mount pieces and hardware in the building and maintaining of a race car. The book gets a bit technical but most can make it through.....heck I did.

      i see.......
      soooooo what would be the answer to this???? i know that it was previously mentioned that the DSE rear coilover set has solved this issue with mounting brackets that you relocate else where. Do i need to worry about anything else after i go with the DSE package???? Thats what im leaning tores I have enough $$$ for the rear set up and should everything saved up for the fronta with in the next couple of weeks.

      I was made aware that the front coilover kits from DSE do not bolt on directly onto the stock front LCA, does anybody know if they bolt on to other LCA from other companies, ie; global west, spc, cpp, so on and so forth????

      is there much of a perfomance diffrence between the Qa1 front coilvers vs DSE???

      thanks for the ton of feedback guys i really appreciated.
      "Project Yeti"
      70 Chevelle Coupe

      BIGGER is BETTER...
      Bigger Engine !!..........
      Bigger Wheels !!!.............
      Bigger AUDIO !!!!..................
      ---------------------------------------------------
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjIRkWENUxM

    5. #45
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      157
      Thanks for your responses bob i really appreciated, can you tell me a little bit more on your front coilover setup, i know you have the Qa1's. If you dont mind me asking why dident you go with DSE all around? is it overkill? Are the qa1 fronts more then plenty then you can ask for??? what kind of LCA are you running? is there anything you would chage???? Are you running big brakes? what size are your wheels??

      thanks alot for you time and patience
      "Project Yeti"
      70 Chevelle Coupe

      BIGGER is BETTER...
      Bigger Engine !!..........
      Bigger Wheels !!!.............
      Bigger AUDIO !!!!..................
      ---------------------------------------------------
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjIRkWENUxM

    6. #46
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      157
      I have also been hearing alot about the SC&C Stage 2 package, how good are any of these stages for ride height adjust ability?
      "Project Yeti"
      70 Chevelle Coupe

      BIGGER is BETTER...
      Bigger Engine !!..........
      Bigger Wheels !!!.............
      Bigger AUDIO !!!!..................
      ---------------------------------------------------
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjIRkWENUxM

    7. #47
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      167
      Quote Originally Posted by 1nkred1ble View Post
      Thanks for your responses bob i really appreciated, can you tell me a little bit more on your front coilover setup, i know you have the Qa1's. If you dont mind me asking why dident you go with DSE all around? is it overkill? Are the qa1 fronts more then plenty then you can ask for??? what kind of LCA are you running? is there anything you would chage???? Are you running big brakes? what size are your wheels??

      thanks alot for you time and patience
      When I went to a front coilover setup (2005 or so), DSE didn't yet have anything for A-bodies.

      Changing to a front coilover is a much simpler process than changing the rear. As I recall the frt conversion is a simple matter of enlarging the holes in the stock LCA so that the slightly larger bolts for the coilover will fit. I didn't change the LCA on the car at the time, left the stock one. Works fine, may change it at some point just to match the other newer pieces.

      I have no complaints about either brand, both work great. Whoever you go with, talk to them to make sure you get the right spring rate vs. what equipment you have on the car now (BB or SB, A/C or not, etc., etc.). All that stuff adds or subtracts weight. The original ones I got were too soft and dropped the car way too far so I had to go to a 450 lb. straight rate spring instead of a softer variable rate. Not difficult to change out but a definite PITA, not something you wanna have to do twice if you can help it. Also make drop spindles or not part of your conversation; I have 2" drops from Belltech that went on with the brakes and UCAs.

      I have Baer 13" rotors and PBR calipers up front with 18x8" Bonspeed wheels. The rears are 12" Baers with 19x10s.
      Bob
      Mooresville, NC
      '66 Chevelle SS (461, T-56)
      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/vb...?do=view&g=274

    8. #48
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      157
      "Also make drop spindles or not part of your conversation; I have 2" drops from Belltech that went on with the brakes and UCAs."

      Make sure drop spindles are a part? or are not a part of my conversation?????

      I was thinking about going the the spindle route just so i would be able to fit those big brakes.
      "Project Yeti"
      70 Chevelle Coupe

      BIGGER is BETTER...
      Bigger Engine !!..........
      Bigger Wheels !!!.............
      Bigger AUDIO !!!!..................
      ---------------------------------------------------
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjIRkWENUxM

    9. #49
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      157
      i tried looking up prices for that belltech spindle you bought, but i cant seem to find them on the site, how much are the spindles for a 70 chevelle?
      "Project Yeti"
      70 Chevelle Coupe

      BIGGER is BETTER...
      Bigger Engine !!..........
      Bigger Wheels !!!.............
      Bigger AUDIO !!!!..................
      ---------------------------------------------------
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjIRkWENUxM

    10. #50
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      167
      Quote Originally Posted by 1nkred1ble View Post
      "Also make drop spindles or not part of your conversation; I have 2" drops from Belltech that went on with the brakes and UCAs."

      Make sure drop spindles are a part? or are not a part of my conversation?????

      I was thinking about going the the spindle route just so i would be able to fit those big brakes.
      Just make sure you talk to the coilover vendor about drop spindles. Not saying you should or shouldn't use them, just don't assume it doesn't matter. Some factor a drop into the spring itself. So talk to them about it, see what they recommend. Each component you pick can/will have an effect on the others in the system.

      I don't think you need drop spindles to fit larger brakes, all it does is move the centerline of the wheel mounting point up 2" vs. stock. Again, talk to the brake guys and suspension guys about what you're looking for, they'll be able to tell you the best way to go.

      I got the spindles thru DSE when I got the Baer brakes, don't have p/n or price specs.
      Bob
      Mooresville, NC
      '66 Chevelle SS (461, T-56)
      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/vb...?do=view&g=274

    11. #51
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      So. Cal.
      Posts
      1,240
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 406 Q-ship View Post
      I have to chime in here. When doing any kind of coil over or even a "shockwave" style shock in the rear of an A-body, it will require a rethinking of the way the lower shock mount is attached to the rear axle housing. The shock stud design for the A-body was NOT designed or even considered to support the weight of the rear of the car.
      Very good info. A shock mount can not convert to a coilover or shockwave mount. Just was not meant to hold the weight of the car. Gotta build the mounts up a lil.

      Here is a lil build-up of my shockwave mounts. Im on the front end now and will post some pics when done. Doing some similar stuff up front. JR

      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=55420

    12. #52
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      157
      Quote Originally Posted by JRouche View Post
      Very good info. A shock mount can not convert to a coilover or shockwave mount. Just was not meant to hold the weight of the car. Gotta build the mounts up a lil.

      Here is a lil build-up of my shockwave mounts. Im on the front end now and will post some pics when done. Doing some similar stuff up front. JR

      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=55420

      is this true for both front and rear mounts or just rear???
      "Project Yeti"
      70 Chevelle Coupe

      BIGGER is BETTER...
      Bigger Engine !!..........
      Bigger Wheels !!!.............
      Bigger AUDIO !!!!..................
      ---------------------------------------------------
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjIRkWENUxM

    13. #53
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      157
      Quote Originally Posted by BobB66SS View Post
      Just make sure you talk to the coilover vendor about drop spindles. Not saying you should or shouldn't use them, just don't assume it doesn't matter. Some factor a drop into the spring itself. So talk to them about it, see what they recommend. Each component you pick can/will have an effect on the others in the system.

      I don't think you need drop spindles to fit larger brakes, all it does is move the centerline of the wheel mounting point up 2" vs. stock. Again, talk to the brake guys and suspension guys about what you're looking for, they'll be able to tell you the best way to go.

      I got the spindles thru DSE when I got the Baer brakes, don't have p/n or price specs.
      If i dont go with the spindle route then how would i be able to throw the big brake system on there??
      Is this when a "hub" comes into play???

      sorry guys i know its frustrating to hear all these dumb questions
      "Project Yeti"
      70 Chevelle Coupe

      BIGGER is BETTER...
      Bigger Engine !!..........
      Bigger Wheels !!!.............
      Bigger AUDIO !!!!..................
      ---------------------------------------------------
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjIRkWENUxM

    14. #54
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      167
      Quote Originally Posted by 1nkred1ble View Post
      If i dont go with the spindle route then how would i be able to throw the big brake system on there??
      Is this when a "hub" comes into play???
      No sweat, we've all been there. It sounds like either you're misinterpreting the definition of drop spindle or I missed something about what's on the car now. Let's back up. The part that bolts between the UCA and LCA and that the brakes mount to is the knuckle. The shaft that the bearings and wheel mounting hub slide onto is the spindle. Where that shaft is located on the knuckle is what defines whether it's a stock spindle or a drop spindle. A "2 inch drop spindle" is a knuckle that has the spindle located 2 inches higher than normal; by raising the centerline of the wheel 2", you effectively drop the rest of the car that same distance. Thus the term "drop spindle". Either style will accept a big brake package. Again, talk to the brake supplier of your choice; chances are they'll have both a stock height spindle and drop spindle as options.

      If you decide to buy the spindle from a different source than the brakes, you will have to make sure the brakes will fit that spindle. That's why it's easier to get them all from one vendor.

      You'll go thru the same thing again when you buy wheels and tires. That/those vendors will need to know your brake and suspension package to make sure the get the size and backspace right to clear the caliper, rotors, sway bar, etc. All of the good ones will know what questions they'll need answers to.
      Bob
      Mooresville, NC
      '66 Chevelle SS (461, T-56)
      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/vb...?do=view&g=274

    15. #55
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 1nkred1ble View Post
      If i dont go with the spindle route then how would i be able to throw the big brake system on there??
      Is this when a "hub" comes into play???

      sorry guys i know its frustrating to hear all these dumb questions
      I'd go with the ATS spindle option and sell the Bell's. Bolt on C5-C6 compatible brakes.

      Don't even worry about it. All these guys are more than willing to help as long as you can keep up.


      vince
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    16. #56
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      157
      Quote Originally Posted by BobB66SS View Post
      No sweat, we've all been there. It sounds like either you're misinterpreting the definition of drop spindle or I missed something about what's on the car now. Let's back up. The part that bolts between the UCA and LCA and that the brakes mount to is the knuckle. The shaft that the bearings and wheel mounting hub slide onto is the spindle. Where that shaft is located on the knuckle is what defines whether it's a stock spindle or a drop spindle. A "2 inch drop spindle" is a knuckle that has the spindle located 2 inches higher than normal; by raising the centerline of the wheel 2", you effectively drop the rest of the car that same distance. Thus the term "drop spindle". Either style will accept a big brake package. Again, talk to the brake supplier of your choice; chances are they'll have both a stock height spindle and drop spindle as options.

      If you decide to buy the spindle from a different source than the brakes, you will have to make sure the brakes will fit that spindle. That's why it's easier to get them all from one vendor.

      You'll go thru the same thing again when you buy wheels and tires. That/those vendors will need to know your brake and suspension package to make sure the get the size and backspace right to clear the caliper, rotors, sway bar, etc. All of the good ones will know what questions they'll need answers to.
      Thank you, you just did a woorrllldddddddd of clearing things up for me. I guess I was a little bit confused by youre previous post, when you mentioned your coilover drop spindle setup. I thought you said that you WOULD NOT go with 2 inch drop spindles when using coilovers becuase it would mess up the geometry of your ride.

      But now i understand that it is possible to use the drop sinples aslong as i get my spring rate where it needs to be from the manufacturer ( DSE)

      Secondly, I currently have the stock 307 SBC in the car that im trying to get started, if im able to accomplish this i dont have to worry about dumping all sort of money in the 454 (that im planning on stroking out to a 496) i have in the garage that needs to be worked up. i.e Instead of spending 2 3 grand on the bb right now i can spend it on the suspension like i am planning to.
      My question is with the coilover setup + the 2 inch drop spindle's would it give me enough defecit ( want a real low front end) to order bbc chevy springs on the coilovers because eventually i do plan on going with the bigger motor?
      this is the stance i am shooting for.
      "Project Yeti"
      70 Chevelle Coupe

      BIGGER is BETTER...
      Bigger Engine !!..........
      Bigger Wheels !!!.............
      Bigger AUDIO !!!!..................
      ---------------------------------------------------
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjIRkWENUxM

    17. #57
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Location
      Southern California
      Posts
      566
      Country Flag: United States
      I have a stance similar to that:


      My front crossmember is 3 inches from the ground (between the front tires)

      There are several issues with running like this on an A-body.

      The driveline angles are one issue that needs to be addressed. You will have to raise the back of the transmission and change the length of the upper rear control arms. If you don't you will have vibrations at highway speeds. This can mean major surgery to the main tunnel to get the clearance. I have adjustable arms which help but I still need to raise the trans. See this thread and this one.

      Another is header clearance. Long tubes will more than likely be too low. Shorties will clear or certain brands of long tubes (Doug's for a Pontiac give more clearance) will clear as well. Mine hang down far lower than I would like. Working one issue at a time.

      Last is that by lowering the car you raise the rear roll center. This is the opposite of what needs to be done. This is a product of the factory suspension. To correct this you need to change the rear suspension mount points or add a watts link or panhard rod. Still doing my homework here.

      Jon
      Jon U.

      1968 GTO - SC&C Suspension, Forgeline SO3 Wheels
      Build Thread
      1967 911 with a few mods

    18. #58
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Posts
      157
      Quote Originally Posted by Roadbuster View Post
      I have a stance similar to that:


      My front crossmember is 3 inches from the ground (between the front tires)

      There are several issues with running like this on an A-body.

      The driveline angles are one issue that needs to be addressed. You will have to raise the back of the transmission and change the length of the upper rear control arms. If you don't you will have vibrations at highway speeds. This can mean major surgery to the main tunnel to get the clearance. I have adjustable arms which help but I still need to raise the trans. See this thread and this one.

      Another is header clearance. Long tubes will more than likely be too low. Shorties will clear or certain brands of long tubes (Doug's for a Pontiac give more clearance) will clear as well. Mine hang down far lower than I would like. Working one issue at a time.

      Last is that by lowering the car you raise the rear roll center. This is the opposite of what needs to be done. This is a product of the factory suspension. To correct this you need to change the rear suspension mount points or add a watts link or panhard rod. Still doing my homework here.

      Jon

      This is the most discouraging bit of information ive received so far. I can barely tie my shoes, how the heck am i supposed to do all that????? I wish i had a 1/8 of your skill & talent. Thanks for your feedback though, now im off to bakers to get a "suspension parts & lingo to english" dictionary.
      "Project Yeti"
      70 Chevelle Coupe

      BIGGER is BETTER...
      Bigger Engine !!..........
      Bigger Wheels !!!.............
      Bigger AUDIO !!!!..................
      ---------------------------------------------------
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjIRkWENUxM

    19. #59
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Location
      Silverdale, Wash
      Posts
      7
      Wow....
      After reading this thread front to back, I am just amazed at how cool the people on this forum are...

      It is just so damn cool of you guys, especially the more experienced suspension guys, to chime in and take the time to break it all down so that it makes sense to a newer builder...I mean, you guys could just throw out some badd ass multi-worded brake lingo and expect a newbie to follow along, and lose patience and flame him when he asks for clarification or a more "basic laymans" answer...

      But you guys don't...You reword it without treating him like a third grader, and that is just soooooooo DAMN COOL...Judging by the specific details in some of your answers, there are a few of you guys who really really know their shiznit and quite honestly might have better things to be doing...But here you are, in a newbies thread, taking the time to make sure this guy ends up with a correct understanding of how the suspension actually works and what to do to get his desired results, instead of him walking away with a spinning, blurry head and some parts list of "you gotta buy these items"...

      If it don't get said by anybody else, "Thanks for the great, USABLE information"...

      Rick

    20. #60
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      167
      Quote Originally Posted by 1nkred1ble View Post
      I thought you said that you WOULD NOT go with 2 inch drop spindles when using coilovers becuase it would mess up the geometry of your ride.

      My question is with the coilover setup + the 2 inch drop spindle's would it give me enough defecit ( want a real low front end) to order bbc chevy springs on the coilovers because eventually i do plan on going with the bigger motor?
      this is the stance i am shooting for.
      Sounds like we got our wires crossed. What I intended to say is that if you have to choose between dropped spindles and shorter springs, the best way to drop the front end is to include dropped spindles. That retains more of the proper suspension geometry, will make the car much easier to align, and give it better road manners. You can drop the nose by cutting coils off your stock springs (something I would NOT suggest you do) or by using springs that are produced with fewer coils; while this is less expensive to do, like most things you get what you pay for. That way makes the car much tougher to get into proper alignment, with camber or caster settings that give the car poor handling characteristics.

      That said, if you have a budget that doesn't allow for coilovers and you're more interested in stand-still stance than road manners, you can still go with shorter springs, you just have to understand the tradeoffs. Like everything else in this hobby, it's a matter of personal choice vs. the $$$ we have available.

      In my case I'd said I went with drop spindles a few years ago at the same time I added the Baer brakes. When I added the coilovers a couple years later, the combo of softer coilover springs + 2" drop spindles REALLY dropped the nose of the car. I said in retrospect I may have been able to get away without the drop spindles given how far up I had to adjust the coilovers if I had to choose one over the other. My intent there was to say that you had options to get the stance you wanted, again depending on what matters to you and what $$ you had. Everything costs money, so if it's stance only that you're after, there's a number of ways to get there as noted above. If you want the best shot at good handling, I'd use drop spindles as part of your plan.

      I can't say if you can get that low of a stance with a SB motor and BB springs; the coilover vendors are better prepared to answer that one.

      As Roadbuster mentioned, try to keep all of your systems in mind when you drop a car that far. You can't get tunnel vision on one system; they all have an effect on other stuff. I like the stance of my car and knew header clearance was going to be an issue. My Hooker header collectors are less than 3" off the ground, and that's after I removed the flanges and used stainless band clamps to make the connection to the rest of the exhaust. That's too low for where/how I drive it. I may have to go to shorty headers at some point, but that also robs power output. And to change headers on my car, the motor has to come back out. Like I said, a change you make one place can have big effects other places.

      There will always be some sort of compromise when picking systems out: lower ride height looks cooler and can handle better but can have ground clearance issues; shorter tire aspect ratio (sidewall height) helps handling but can rattle your fillings loose. There's no perfect list of components, they call come with a tradeoff somewhere.

      Take your time, decide what matters to you most about the car for the $$ you have to spend, talk to as many people/vendors as you can, and in the end you'll come out fine.
      Bob
      Mooresville, NC
      '66 Chevelle SS (461, T-56)
      https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/vb...?do=view&g=274

    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com