Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 16 of 16
    1. #1
      Join Date
      May 2020
      Posts
      41

      First gen Camaro hydroboost or not

      Hey guys rebuilding first gen Camaro just did full tci suspension front to back and looking to see what people are doing for brake boosters with a ls. Is hydroboost the way to go or is it more problems then it’s worth?

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Walla Walla, WA
      Posts
      1,512
      Country Flag: United States
      I've got hydraboost and love it. Took a little trouble shooting, but nothing too bad. The adapter plate on mine tilts the master cylinder up more than I'd like. Look for a kit that has the master cylinder more level (I think Hydratech).
      Mike Kelcy - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Sep 2009
      Posts
      2,960
      Country Flag: United States
      If you are looking to eliminate the PS pump from your accessories, check out the iBooster swaps that a lot of guys are doing.


      1955 Nomad project LC9, 4L80e, C5 brakes, Vision wheels
      1968 Camaro 6.2 w/ LSA, TR6060-Magnum hybrid and etc SOLD
      1976 T/A LS1 6 Speed, and etc. SOLD
      Follow me on Instagram: ryeguy2006a

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jan 2013
      Location
      Las Vegas, NV
      Posts
      31
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by ryeguy2006a View Post
      If you are looking to eliminate the PS pump from your accessories, check out the iBooster swaps that a lot of guys are doing.
      Can the stock clutch master location be retained on the ibooster swaps?
      Scott Atkinson
      68 Camaro SS in progress
      Las Vegas, NV / Redondo Beach, CA

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Mar 2021
      Location
      Indy
      Posts
      130
      Country Flag: United States
      Would you please provide a link to the iBooster that is being used?

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      Chit-ca-go
      Posts
      472
      I have hydro boost for many years and don’t care for the artificial feeling of it.
      1971 Firebird
      2017 Slipstream SS

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      Santa Barbara, Ca
      Posts
      1,174
      I’m super happy with the DSE booster setup I put on my 68. It’s a C6 Corvette assembly so it has a nice, modern feel to it. I’m big into simplicity, so the hydro boost doesn’t appeal to me; and at least on my car, power steering hose routing near the headers is already tight. I know that probably doesn’t answer your question, but I’d do this exact setup again if I were building another car today.
      Andy

      1967 Camaro RS
      Magnacharged LS1/T56
      543 rwhp, 516 rwtq
      Sold

      1968 Firebird
      LS427/570 and T56 Magnum


    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,827
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by NCSU68 View Post
      Would you please provide a link to the iBooster that is being used?
      https://www.evcreate.com/installing-the-ibooster/

      https://tulayswirewerks.com/product/...-wire-harness/

      https://www.bbtfabrications.com/fab-...290/category=0

      Don
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      Santa Barbara, Ca
      Posts
      1,174

      What is the benefit of these iboosters? Seems similar to what BMW is using on their newer models; which makes sense with all the EVs and hybrids being built, along with more and more autonomous driving systems. I guess I’m just not seeing the advantage for a PT style car.
      Andy

      1967 Camaro RS
      Magnacharged LS1/T56
      543 rwhp, 516 rwtq
      Sold

      1968 Firebird
      LS427/570 and T56 Magnum


    10. #10
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      Rockford Illinois
      Posts
      3,949
      Country Flag: United States

      to boost or not?

      My vote is manual brakes !!!!! Less is more. Less cost more pedal feel, less parts more room and less weight. Less to go wrong. More brakes when the engine stalls or isn't running. When doing a track day having less brakes is not good when something breaks. Always something to consider !!



      Keep it simple keep it fun works best for me!
      May The Horsepower Be With You !!!


    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Posts
      727
      Kind of of pros and cons of hydro boost. My 66 Mustang I used a Hydratech hydro boost with my C5 discs front and rear. Worked great. They would put your nose on the wind shield.
      My 67 Nova had the same C5 brakes front and rear with parts from KORE3. Stopped really well you just had to push a bit harder.Name:  67 Nova LS1 003 2011.jpg
Views: 1361
Size:  329.3 KB
      Attached Images Attached Images  

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Sep 2023
      Location
      Houston Texas
      Posts
      13
      Country Flag: United States
      Name:  Camaro ibooster.jpg
Views: 1247
Size:  112.9 KB

      I'm a big fan of the iBooster in 1st Gen application.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Posts
      200
      I am contemplating removing my hydroboost system. I have had it in my car for 10 years. It works great, maybe too great.

      It always has been very touchy. You can lock up wheels with two fingers, but I felt I have driven car enough to adjust for it...

      Then, I had a close call recently where I thought someone might pull up in front of me, so I hit brakes, not like a deer jumped out, but got on them. The car didn't seem to be slowing down...once past situation I looked in rear view mirror and saw a cloud of smoke. Realized I had locked up front wheels!

      I tested it a few more times, and couldn't believe how little pedal I needed to lock up.

      Waiting to hear back from hydratech if there is a way to limit assist.

      Rethinking hydroboost, might be great with an ABS system?
      Fred Bartoli
      Altronics Inc
      www.AltronicsInc.com
      Project Full Circle -> www.altronicsinc.com/camaro

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Jul 2008
      Posts
      509
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by FJB2069 View Post
      I am contemplating removing my hydroboost system. I have had it in my car for 10 years. It works great, maybe too great.

      It always has been very touchy. You can lock up wheels with two fingers, but I felt I have driven car enough to adjust for it...

      Then, I had a close call recently where I thought someone might pull up in front of me, so I hit brakes, not like a deer jumped out, but got on them. The car didn't seem to be slowing down...once past situation I looked in rear view mirror and saw a cloud of smoke. Realized I had locked up front wheels!

      I tested it a few more times, and couldn't believe how little pedal I needed to lock up.

      Waiting to hear back from hydratech if there is a way to limit assist.

      Rethinking hydroboost, might be great with an ABS system?
      You have more brake than tire. I ran into the same problem but have an adjustable proportioning valve and have mine set so all 4 bite. After the experience pictured below (all 4 locked up on highway when someone cut over from a non-moving lane) I re-educated myself on the limits of my tires and then upgraded to a better traction compound so the brake and tire combo would better suit one another. This is just with a hydroboost out of a 05 Tahoe and 2000 Camaro / LS1 big brakes, all from the junkyard. I smile at people spending big money on race brakes they don't need.

      *Jeff*
      Project Salty - 1964 4 door Malibu, beaten, neglected, red headed foster child
      Cammed LQ4 / T56 Swap Project Thread <-click to read! 😁

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Posts
      200
      Quote Originally Posted by Hotwire View Post
      You have more brake than tire. I ran into the same problem but have an adjustable proportioning valve and have mine set so all 4 bite. After the experience pictured below (all 4 locked up on highway when someone cut over from a non-moving lane) I re-educated myself on the limits of my tires and then upgraded to a better traction compound so the brake and tire combo would better suit one another. This is just with a hydroboost out of a 05 Tahoe and 2000 Camaro / LS1 big brakes, all from the junkyard. I smile at people spending big money on race brakes they don't need.
      Thanks for the info. I am going to readjust my proportioning valve as well. I originally did it by adjusting with brake pressure gauge per wilwood specs, but think real world test may be better.

      Hydratech is telling me to check with the brake pad compound I have as I may be better off with a standard organic pad as the one wilwood most likely supplied bites too hard. I also run Michelin Pilot sport tires.

      Did you change pads? What tires do you go with?
      Fred Bartoli
      Altronics Inc
      www.AltronicsInc.com
      Project Full Circle -> www.altronicsinc.com/camaro

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      Fredericksburg, VA.
      Posts
      3,164
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Jim Nilsen View Post
      My vote is manual brakes !!!!! Less is more. Less cost more pedal feel, less parts more room and less weight. Less to go wrong. More brakes when the engine stalls or isn't running. When doing a track day having less brakes is not good when something breaks. Always something to consider !!

      Keep it simple keep it fun works best for me!
      I totally agree!
      Steve Hayes
      "Dust Off"
      68 Camaro

      Support the RPM Act
      https://www.sema.org/rpm-faq.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com