Results 21 to 40 of 59
Thread: Busted and I gotta fix it
-
06-21-2011 #21
Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Lehigh Valley Pa
- Posts
- 1,269
Is it fixed yet? LOL.. Keep doing what your doing. Gonna be a great engine when its done.
1996 Federal Cadillac hearse
1988 Eureka Chevy hearse
-
06-21-2011 #22
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 288
I may be full of beans and am not a Pontiac engine expert but I'd still pay attention to the cam end play or cam walk especially on a roller cam where it may be more crucial.
As others have said, matched gears in material can also make a difference and both may keep ugly pieces of material out of your oil pump.
06-21-2011 #23did you go back to a stock cam retainer or did you go with one of the aftermarket ones from nitemare performance or Simm's Engineering retainer plate?
Some times I'm fast sometimes I'm half-fast
06-21-2011 #24Simms is on a cross country bicycle trip. I don't blame him. I'd do the same if I could take a year off. Nightmare is on the list of possibles. I'd rather have the Simm's since it incorporates a true roller bearing but I can see where any additional oil flow to the cam end would be beneficial.
A friend of mine who does a lot of technical writing for HPP put out feelers to 3 of the top engine builders in the Pontiac trade. They all came back with the same answer. Excessive end play is not the fault of the stock Pontiac thrust plate. They say look for another cause.
06-24-2011 #25I found a little time to be in the garage tonight. I mocked up the crank and main bearings to check the clearances. They checked out fine. I was a little worried about the aftermarket crank being accurate but it was. Next up is mocking up the 4 corner pistons/rods to see how far down in the hole we are and see if we need to deck it. Then I'll be heading up to see Marty one night. With luck I'll have to do is a final hone on this block to get it from .030 over to .035 over for these pistons.
06-25-2011 #26Did you check the thrust surface on the crank?
I'm sure you know about the horor stories on wiping out the bearings.Some times I'm fast sometimes I'm half-fast
06-25-2011 #27I had and I did. Nice and smooth. It was my understanding that the thrust surface issue was limited to a few early production pieces but it never hurts to check.
06-25-2011 #28
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Kalamazoo, MI
- Posts
- 144
Nice build, I will be following this as I want to do a 461 soon for my GTO.
1969 Pontiac GTO
-The Nameless project.
0331, USMC, Semper Fi.
06-26-2011 #29Today I spent some time weighing the pistons and rods that were already assembled. It's not scientific but since the seller claimed this stuff was balanced I wanted a quick gut check. I was amazed to see that these assemblies were almost identical. Six of the eight came in at 1526 grams and two came in at 1527. Close enough.

Next on the list was to mock up the crank and pistons on four corners to check the deck height. I never got to trial fitting those rods and pistons because I found my first issue. I'd read that the crank counterweight might need some clearance on on side. It does.

The other side is close as well. Looks like it's time for a little grinder work.
06-27-2011 #30



Reply With Quote