Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 15 of 15
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2002
      Location
      Benicia, CA
      Posts
      1,433
      Country Flag: United States

      2nd Gen Front Suspension Choices?

      If you had to buy a new front suspension (UCA's, LCA's, springs, shocks) for street/autocross/road racing what would you get? I would like to keep the current frame and mounts, just bolt on stuff at this time. I will have extremely wide tires on this car and am using B-body spindles with the big outer bearing.

      Would be interested in adjustable coilovers for the front, hopefully a setup that makes it easy to install without major frame mods...

      Any brands that make kits would be fine, I am looking for feedback on what would be a great system to use all-around with some tuning adjustability. I would eventually match the rear springs to the front.

      Jeff
      1971 RS Camaro: PAINKILLER


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      Tinley Park
      Posts
      132
      im interested in this as well. so far one thing i have found that is very intersting is this...
      http://www.74-77camaro.com/Articles/...ges/page22.jpg
      http://www.74-77camaro.com/Articles/...ges/page23.jpg

      i found this link in nastyz28's suspension section. this is the first thing i am going to do to my subframe when it comes back from the sandblaster.

      anyone know if this is bad? i know a lot of people use the g-mod for 1st gen camaros, and it works wonderfully. i hope this mod is a good idea as well.
      pain is nothing compared to the emptiness that comes from quitting.
      owner of "Primal"
      1970 Camaro RS
      http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2092707
      Camaro Z28

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      Tinley Park
      Posts
      132
      noone? there has to be a few 2nd gens here.... i couldnt imagine this site only having a bunch of 1st gens and thats all... :icon_razz
      pain is nothing compared to the emptiness that comes from quitting.
      owner of "Primal"
      1970 Camaro RS
      http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2092707
      Camaro Z28

    4. #4
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      Sorry, I tried to read that but my eye ball fell out. I have built a couple 2nd gens and I think they work well with stock geometry.
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    5. #5
      Join Date
      Mar 2003
      Location
      Boringville
      Posts
      1,987
      quick!!! pick up your eyeball and re-insert!

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      There is no bolt-in coilover setup that is any good. The QA1 stuff isn't good for much of anything (crappy shocks and poor adjustability).
      My suggestion is to take a look at www.globalwest.net they have the best bolt-on type stuff on the market for that car. I would say their tubular upper a-arms combined with a set of Del-A-Lum lower bushings.
      You need to replace the body mount bushings with Aluminum or Poly ones. Weld-in subframe connectors are a must.
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jun 2002
      Location
      Benicia, CA
      Posts
      1,433
      Country Flag: United States

      Cool!

      Got the sf connectors welded in, aluminum body bushings, will be looking to see if I can have a set of Delrin/Del-a-lum bushings machined to fit my current aftermarket control arms before I buy a different set altogether. I figured the QA-1 coilover conversion stuff was fairly weak, not for road racing and autocross without specific springs and shocks. Thanks for the response Lowend!
      Jeff
      1971 RS Camaro: PAINKILLER

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA
      Posts
      516

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Posts
      54
      I was also wondering about that article. Would moving the a arm holes help a second gen as much as a first gen? I would like to know more about the vintage setups that were used on second gen cars. There is just something to me about using modified stock peices rather than aftermarket.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      957
      Keep in mind that the vintage guys run vintage rubber, and that is a HUGE difference relative to a good contemporary radial tire.

      I am not so certain about the suspension geometry of the second gen's, it might be an improvement over the first gen's, but in absolute terms still probably isn't "great." The spindle suffers from a really low pin height, so lowering the car will likely put the geometry in not so good shape. I wish we would have mapped it all out when we pulled the current project car apart, just didn't have the time.

      We will be taking a look at things in more detail at some point in the near future, but this is not the first thing on the list at this time. I wouldn't stray too far away from what others have done that seems to work, if there was a silver bullet, it would likely have been found already.

      Mark

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Hamilton, NJ
      Posts
      4,317
      Country Flag: United States
      I don't think those mods are needed if you do good aftermarket control arms, which have the same basic geometry changes built in, if I understand this correctly.
      Scott from NJ.

      Vent Windows Forever! ...

      Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold
      I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors

    12. #12
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Mchenry, IL
      Posts
      219
      well if you want to fork out the extra money like i just did get the wayne due set-up. i can say it looks like it is well worth the money. i did the C-4 frame only cause i got a sweet deal on it. I was looking at the C-5 which parts are somewhat cheap for now and you dont have to worry about upgrading the brakes just because they already are big 13" to be exact. Just a thought,i know your trying to keep it under a budget but a couple more months of saving would be well worth it in the end. you would get good "street/autocross/road racing " out of this!

      I still have your email and when i get the frame back from powdercoating i will send you some pics.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Pittsburgh, PA
      Posts
      316

      My Spring project....

      I think I have a good idea of what I will be doing for the front of my car. In keeping in my budget constraints and willingness to make my own mistakes, I am planning on the following for the front of my car.

      First will be a set of hidden adjusters & some heavier front springs. GW solid bushings in the lower arms. I think after that I am going to speak with Marcus @ SC&C. His combination of tall ball joints/tie rods & adjustable upper arms, seems to offer the cost & tuning capabilities I am looking for.

      There are some issues that I would need some assurance on. I hate A-arms that dont have a provision for a droop bumper. I would also have to see that everything would package inside my 16" wheels.

      I have just started this search, so this could all change.....maybe next week............

      Shane

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      boerne texas
      Posts
      314
      check out www.martzchassis.com he does a good job.

      rickk

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      Central CA USA
      Posts
      6,114
      Country Flag: United States
      The upper balljoints from Marcus look very good, plus the mod is reverseable and you don't have to cut on the subframe. The second gen camber curve isn't all that great, better than a stock first gen but less than a second gen with Guldstrand mod. If you can get 5 deg positive caster, it helps a lot.
      David
      67 Camaro RS that will be faster than anything Mary owns.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com