Results 201 to 220 of 763
Thread: 1970 GTO Version 2.0
-
05-14-2008 #201
I have been dealing with adjusting the drive-line angles on my setup also. What has me going is the math. If you lower the transmount, which will increase a positive reading. Lets say from 4* to 4.5* and the drive-shaft is 2* prior to adjustment, your orig working angle is 4-2= 2*. When we lower the rear of the trans to 4.5* the front of the d.s. will lower slightly thus reducing its angle from 2* so with a larger trans angle and a smaller d.s. angle the math equates to a larger working angle when if fact you have just physically reduced the working angle.
What am I missing?Matt
Current project: " Chain Reaction "
A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.
1969 RS Camaro L92 T56 Quadra-link, CW sub, Ford 9" a progressive build.
Ex track car: 1995 Camaro LS1 T56
-
05-15-2008 #202Thats is certainly something i never knew. Quite interesting.
Chris Smock aka Blazed67
1967 Firebird Convertible- Tough Luck- never ending
2003 VW Jetta Wagon 1.8T- the new DD
2006 Suzuki SV1000R- greatly missed
05-15-2008 #203