Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
    Results 41 to 60 of 76
    1. #41
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Posts
      20
      Actually lets think this harder

      not total power but Power to Wieght ratio
      a 1000 lb car can really smack around a 3500 car if both have 450 HP
      so at 3400lb and 500 hp (less than A NASCAR craftsman truck) a 350 hp car at 1500 lbs would demolish it.



    2. #42
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Chesapeake, VA
      Posts
      678
      I agree with those who have said it's about power to weight ratio. Light cars have been kicking around heavier cars with more power for a long time...as long as the power to weight ratio and rubber on the road are there.

    3. #43
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      North Port, FL
      Posts
      174
      Quote Originally Posted by fiorano
      Actually lets think this harder

      not total power but Power to Wieght ratio
      a 1000 lb car can really smack around a 3500 car if both have 450 HP
      so at 3400lb and 500 hp (less than A NASCAR craftsman truck) a 350 hp car at 1500 lbs would demolish it.

      yeah, that was going to be my comment.............there is no magical hp number..........just a power-to-weight number (and even that number would be adjustable based on the drivers skill/comfort)

      350 hp might feel great in a 3200lb vette........but in a 4400lb bigger car, thats barely enough to get it moving decently.

      we really should be looking at power-to-weight.


      just for example.....the Caparo T1 has 1000hp-per-tonne (freaking insane, basically a street legal F1 car)......with only a 575hp engine. 575 might seem fine in a muscle car, but in this thing it is downright deadly.
      0-100 = 5 seconds (traction limited im sure) and corners at 3g's!!
      http://www.supercars.net/cars/3376.html

      the top gear video of them testing the T1 is entertaining.
      http://video.google.com/videosearch?...=en&sitesearch=
      obviously it needs a bit more fine-tuning before us mere mortals can handle it
      current - 93 RX7 Twin Turbo Brilliant Black - awaiting LSx engine swap
      previous - 95 TransAm Red, 383ci Forged LT1/4, FMS 238/245 cam
      previous - 2000 BMW 740IL Black
      previous - 95 VR4 Twin Turbo Pearl White

    4. #44
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      ridgefield ct
      Posts
      876
      ok so what's a good power to weight ratio that we can actually attain with our american steel cars?
      work in progress--for the next 10 years.
      1987 monte carlo ss 383ci, 9.7:1, xe274 cam, vortec heads, 200r4, 3.73 posi.

    5. #45
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      So. Cal
      Posts
      1,179
      Quote Originally Posted by monza
      This woman had to much hp...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNLpZ...eature=related

      (sure lots of you have seen it... some wife in a Cobra)

      By the looks of it at the start, I would have told her to get the F$%K out of the car. Simply Amazing! More money then brains I guess....
      Ron DeRaad
      68 Camaro RSx
      Darton Sleeved LS9 - 434ci (4.155x4.00)
      AFR LSX245 Heads (12:1cr)
      660hp/588tq

    6. #46
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      So. Cal
      Posts
      1,179
      Quote Originally Posted by megaladon6
      ok so what's a good power to weight ratio that we can actually attain with our american steel cars?
      I agree...that would be a better ratio to go by.....I'm thinking around 6 to 7:1 hp/weight. (with driver)
      Ron DeRaad
      68 Camaro RSx
      Darton Sleeved LS9 - 434ci (4.155x4.00)
      AFR LSX245 Heads (12:1cr)
      660hp/588tq

    7. #47
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Northern Indiana
      Posts
      737
      Another factor imho is what kind of power are you used to...
      I have gradually climbed the ladder of power over the years.
      I used to think that 300RWHP was a lot.
      Then you get comfortable with that and want more.
      Scott
      G Force Designs Concepts #004
      "Quicksilver"
      1965 Mustang Fastback
      347/450hp FRPP crate engine,G Force T5
      SSBC 4wdb,Budnik M5's etc...
      SOLD

      2011 GT500
      Ingot Silver Metallic
      Stripe delete
      SVTPP/Elec. Pkg.
      Stock for now
      SOLD

      70 Pro Touring Nova
      572/620ho crate
      TKO 600
      DSE suspension upgrades

      SOLD

    8. #48
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      I will say that hp is more streetable now than it was a decade ago. When I built my 383 10 years ago with a retrofit Hyd roller poeple said 500+ HP and almost 550 ft/lbs was too much. Now cars come from the factory getting better MPG than I do and running similar or better HP figures. So part of the answer is what type of engine are you running? An SBC will get unstreetable real quick but an LSx can still be docile at the same levels.

      Just something else to consider in conjunction with power-to-weight.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    9. #49
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      Burleson, Texas
      Posts
      245
      It's kinda like money or hot chicks...you can never have too much.
      Aaron
      1979 Trans Am

    10. #50
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      So. Cal
      Posts
      1,179
      Quote Originally Posted by 6'9"Witha69
      I will say that hp is more streetable now than it was a decade ago. When I built my 383 10 years ago with a retrofit Hyd roller poeple said 500+ HP and almost 550 ft/lbs was too much. Now cars come from the factory getting better MPG than I do and running similar or better HP figures. So part of the answer is what type of engine are you running? An SBC will get unstreetable real quick but an LSx can still be docile at the same levels.

      Just something else to consider in conjunction with power-to-weight.
      I think there are two different thoughts about streetability. One is engine performance and the other is car to road/city streets. I talk mostly about the car to road more so engine performance. I agree....with today's technology, serious horsepower is being made that drive like production cars with killer fuel mileage.
      Ron DeRaad
      68 Camaro RSx
      Darton Sleeved LS9 - 434ci (4.155x4.00)
      AFR LSX245 Heads (12:1cr)
      660hp/588tq

    11. #51
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Mountain View, CA
      Posts
      9,583
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by ronracer
      I think there are two different thoughts about streetability. One is engine performance and the other is car to road/city streets. I talk mostly about the car to road more so engine performance. I agree....with today's technology, serious horsepower is being made that drive like production cars with killer fuel mileage.

      To that point, I drove a friends M5 last weekend.

      500hp and under normal driving it's as docile as my Subaru.
      True T.

      Whats new with Project 1/2-Trak?


      Follow my wisecracks on Sports, Food, Politics and other BS on Twitter.

      My blog

      When they kick out your front door, How you gonna come?
      With your hands on your head, Or on the trigger of your gun?

    12. #52
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      ^^Exactly
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    13. #53
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      215
      Country Flag: United States
      Here's my take, for what it's worth:

      As much power as you can hook up to the ground reasonably on street tires.
      A number your chassis and powertrain can easily handle.
      Get numbers you are comfortable with for acceleration. Choose a car you do not want to get smoked by, let's say, 90% of the other cars out there.
      Have a broad torque curve for tractibility.
      Run pump gas.
      Not overheat.
      Get reliable service without repair or replacement of major parts such as engine trans etc..
      Get mileage you require.


      Kind of like: 450 crank TQ=Normally aspirated
      750 crank TQ=Forced air

      Like others said, it is a number that can be enjoyed in your particular car and make it more fun (as opposed to a chore) to drive.

    14. #54
      Join Date
      Jul 2001
      Location
      Detroit, Michigan
      Posts
      6,854
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 6'9"Witha69
      The real answer is, whatever the tires can handle. 300 hp tire, 300 hp engine. Get the idea?
      DING DING DING!!! WE HAVE A WINNER!!!

      That right there is all the answer you need. No sense sportin' 500rwhp when all you got are 26" tall Nitto radials. The thread could have ended right there.
      1968 Pro-Touring Camaro LS1

      Project: Next Year
      - Start date; June '01
      - Completion; Sometime next year or the year after.....

    15. #55
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Location
      Atlanta GA
      Posts
      7,477
      id like to stay at 500 at the most..

    16. #56
      Join Date
      Jun 2007
      Location
      Fort Myers, FL
      Posts
      1,003
      I agree with as much as your tires can handle. Because like has already been said in this thread you'll always going to want more its part of life. There is never going to be a good number that will work for everyone. But if your tires can't hold the power then maybe you have too much.....and that was a maybe some people like being able to smoke there tires in any gear that they are in.
      Chris Smock aka Blazed67
      1967 Firebird Convertible- Tough Luck- never ending
      2003 VW Jetta Wagon 1.8T- the new DD
      2006 Suzuki SV1000R- greatly missed

    17. #57
      Join Date
      Aug 2001
      Location
      Connecticut
      Posts
      1,572
      Country Flag: United States
      never enough hp.... bad addiction! Most 11-12 second rides scare normal people. (those of us here don't qualify as 'normal') 9-10 second rides on the street usually make normal people soil themselves... it's fun other than the cleanup.
      1968 Camaro RS/SS, LS7 with Katech mods, T56 Magnum, C6Z06 Brakes
      1968 Camaro RS Convertible LS3/480hp/4L70E
      1962 Corvette 327-340hp stock
      1963 Corvette Split Window Coupe
      1967 Corvette L79 convertible
      2006 Corvette Z06
      2011 Corvette GS convertible


    18. #58
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Location
      Calgary, Canada
      Posts
      662
      Quote Originally Posted by 68sixspeed
      never enough hp.... bad addiction! Most 11-12 second rides scare normal people. (those of us here don't qualify as 'normal') 9-10 second rides on the street usually make normal people soil themselves... it's fun other than the cleanup.
      So funny and so true.
      Dave
      FUeL 69 Camaro RS BuilD by G-Force Design & Concept
      68 Corvair coupe
      65 Impala SS
      64 Corvair Rampside
      62 Corvair Greenbrier
      Asst. daily drivers

      http://www.sourceboards.com/

    19. #59
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      mo
      Posts
      1,343
      Quote Originally Posted by 68sixspeed
      never enough hp.... bad addiction! Most 11-12 second rides scare normal people. (those of us here don't qualify as 'normal') 9-10 second rides on the street usually make normal people soil themselves... it's fun other than the cleanup.
      Drove a 8 second street car on the street, then it went 7's still on the street. wasn't friendly and about 75/100 miles on a tank was all it was good for, but well worth it for all those aw's.
      Thall shall fear no amount of boost, For thy bottle is with me.......

    20. #60
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Colorado
      Posts
      397
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by trapin
      DING DING DING!!! WE HAVE A WINNER!!!

      That right there is all the answer you need. No sense sportin' 500rwhp when all you got are 26" tall Nitto radials. The thread could have ended right there.
      Good reference point, but I want about 20% more power than that. I want to be able to haze the tires at speed if I feel like it. I would rather let my foot modulate that threshold than wish I had more power.

    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com