Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 3 of 3

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      2,413

      Lift exceeding flow. please advise

      I purchaced a 406 some time ago and have tore it down and Im changing cams and some other stuff. The original owner claimed it had1.6 rockers but the 1.6 rockers morphed into 1.65s (original owner insits Im wrong but ive measured a number of times)

      I have no geometry issues or binding. Piston to valve clearance is at .120 with out gaskets. Measured with a solid lifter (roller) Cam button clearance is .004-.005
      My springs will bind @ 650 lift so Im clear there.

      As is Ive got .580 on intake .593 exhaust

      Here comes the question

      By all the info Ive found my heads (TFS 23*) will putter out at .560 intake and .570 exhaust.

      So that makes about .020 lift past where the heads stop flowing.



      Is this going to be Good, Bad or indifferant.


      __________________________________________________ ______________-

      I remember an Engine masters Small block contestant claiming .858 of lift but I cant remember his reasoning though.

      Found it http://www.popularhotrodding.com/eng...302_leftcoast/ Tom Nelsons
      Nothing says "I built this" better than tool marks and dykem blue..

      Follow my 3 link build. https://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sh...ad.php?t=61592


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The City of Fountains
      Posts
      16,120
      Country Flag: United States
      I am a dummy when it comes to things like this, but I will relay some information that I was told one time regarding this subject. You want the valve to go past the point of max lift a little bit. This will keep the valve open at the max flow lift a little longer. Sort of like shifting a few hundred RPM past your peak power. Made sense to me. I am sure someone has a moce scientific explanation.

      Andrew
      1970 GTO Version 3.0
      1967 Cougar build
      GM High-Tech Performance feature
      My YouTube Channel Please Subscribe!
      Instagram @dr__efi
      I deliver what EFI promises.
      Remote Holley EFI tuning.
      Please get in touch if I can be of service.

      "You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets." ~ Her

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      I would say its indifferent

      Going past peak flow lift point does serve to increase dwell at peak flow point slightly. If you go too far it can hurt things, but with this small of a number I doubt its having a measurable effect
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett


    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com