Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 12 of 12

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Dec 2005
      Location
      Maryland
      Posts
      1,863
      Country Flag: United States
      You may want to check header clearance before you make a desicion.That was the problem I found.Some mounts aren't real generous with steering box and frame clearance



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      Central Florida
      Posts
      580
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 57hemicuda
      You may want to check header clearance before you make a desicion.That was the problem I found.Some mounts aren't real generous with steering box and frame clearance
      I am using the Holley/Hooker Long Tube LS1 headers which clear with either set of plates, however they are really tight with the S&P mounts (I had to demple one tube to clear the pitman arm). Clearance with the Holley Plates is not an issue.

      I am just trying to determine which set offers better overall weight distribution.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      England
      Posts
      1,042
      The plates that move the engine back.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2003
      Location
      Nyköping, Sweden
      Posts
      292
      Country Flag: Sweden
      In the installation guide for LS1 engines that GM sells (#88959384) they have a drawing showing how the engine mounts should be located to get the backplane at the same location as an CSB engine.

      From seeing pictures of the Hooker plates I believe that they have done them according to the GM spec.

      The S&P plates are done the "easy" way and using one existing bolthole in the block and therefore moves the engine/trans forward.

      Jan
      Jan Suhr
      Nyköping, Sweden
      1969 Pro touring Camaro Z/28 LS1/T56
      Scandinavian Pro Touring Forum protouring.se

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      489
      In the terms of overall effect keep it LOWER.

      When you look at the change in weight distribution by moving the engine back 1 1/2" it doesn't do a damn thing. By comparison moving the battery to the trunk has a far more profound change in weight balance. To see any major benefit you need to move the engine 6-8" rearward.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      absecon, new jersey
      Posts
      405
      Country Flag: United States
      The plates i got for the vette put my motor 1 1/4 inch forward,so i had to move my 700 forward and remake the crossmember.The thing was i modified my hooker sidepipes to fit ls1 flanges ,when finished the sidepipes came out right in the right location,if i had set the motor back the 1 1/4 inch they wouldve been jambed up against my rear tires,so it helped me by using them.
      73 corvette chop top silver LS6 motor ,LS6 intake,700r4,2400 pro torque convertor ,3.70 gears,modified hooker sidepipes to fit LS1,17 x9.5 boyd starburst,nitto 275/50/17-255/50/17 tires,vb&p suspension,nitrous,L-88 headlights,autometer guages.L88 hood,flares,spreader bar,vb&p sway bars

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Feb 2005
      Location
      Central Florida
      Posts
      580
      Country Flag: United States

      Update

      FWIW,

      I welded up the Holley plates. Then drilled and tapped them to sit lower but in their original position (closer to the firewall).

      I ended up with plates that position the motor tight to the firewall (Holley's position) and Lower (S&P's position).

      The headers now have plenty of clearance.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com