Results 1 to 20 of 72
Hybrid View
-
02-21-2022 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 193
First off, Dunning-Kruger is a "gate keeping"/Credentialist bit of gaslighting. It is best un-wound by observing the ferocity with which the elite try to undercut your perceptions: ie "What are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?" Think it was just co-incidence that it came out at the time of internet adoption? It was in fact a direct response, as in: "Can't have the plebe's thinking their newfound, newly shared perceptions of the way the world is run have validity, can we?" It's a particularly/typically ugly application of academe against the human intellect, and should be left in the corrupt sewers it came from.
And I think you're confusion is that when "we" say set up negative camber we're doing so without allowing for the distortion of the tire carcass.
So in action, whatever keeps the tread surface making generally the most effective contact with the road, is good. Simple physics says having much of the weight borne by the outer half of the tread shouldn't be all that bad. Empirical discovery shows there is actual bonding taking place, some say molecular or materials bonding. That means every millimeter squared of contact patch is better.
-





Reply With Quote



