Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 12 of 12
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Posts
      431
      Country Flag: United States

      fuel pulsation damper

      Anyone running an aftermarket one with their EFI conversion? I just bought a Tanks EFI tank for my 1971 Camaro and I can't use the original GM one anymore (the one that goes in-tank on the supply line).

      Looking for an external one. The pulsation noise is quite loud now, hoping to damp it back down.

      1971 Camaro
      GM HT383, MiniRam EFI, AFR heads
      "8-speed" trans (700R4 + Gear Vendors OD)


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Mar 2013
      Location
      Beaufort,SC
      Posts
      329
      Country Flag: United States
      Don't the factory ls and vortec motors have them built into the factory rails?

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Mar 2013
      Location
      Beaufort,SC
      Posts
      329
      Country Flag: United States

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jun 2012
      Location
      South Lyon, MI
      Posts
      1,244
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by no go nova View Post
      Don't the factory ls and vortec motors have them built into the factory rails?
      The LS rails do. The older plastic Vortec rails do. The newer Vortec rectangular steel rails are "self-damping".

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jun 2012
      Location
      South Lyon, MI
      Posts
      1,244
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by ULTM8Z View Post
      Anyone running an aftermarket one with their EFI conversion? I just bought a Tanks EFI tank for my 1971 Camaro and I can't use the original GM one anymore (the one that goes in-tank on the supply line).

      Looking for an external one. The pulsation noise is quite loud now, hoping to damp it back down.
      If you run a regulator near the fuel rail, it may dampen better than controlling pressure at or near the tank.

      The later returnless LS1 rails have a damper in the crossover that looks like the regulator. This one is a bit bigger and may be more effective than the smaller screw-in aftermarket dampers.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Posts
      431
      Country Flag: United States
      Interesting. Thanks for the link. I'd have to rig up some receptacle in my fuel rail setup to screw this in to...
      1971 Camaro
      GM HT383, MiniRam EFI, AFR heads
      "8-speed" trans (700R4 + Gear Vendors OD)

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The City of Fountains
      Posts
      16,129
      Country Flag: United States
      Bill,

      I see that some dampers have a vacuum hook up. Can you elaborate on that?

      Andrew
      1970 GTO Version 3.0
      1967 Cougar build
      GM High-Tech Performance feature
      My YouTube Channel Please Subscribe!
      Instagram @dr__efi
      I deliver what EFI promises.
      Remote Holley EFI tuning.
      Please get in touch if I can be of service.

      "You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets." ~ Her

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jun 2012
      Location
      South Lyon, MI
      Posts
      1,244
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by andrewb70 View Post
      Bill,

      I see that some dampers have a vacuum hook up. Can you elaborate on that?

      Andrew
      Andrew,

      Yes I can. The vacuum reference helps to keep the diaphragm in a neutral position so it works best. If the fuel pressure is referenced to manifold air pressure (MAP), than it will vary depending on throttle position and engine speed. The vacuum reference makes the damper more effective. This does not work for constant pressure systems or for some of the newer constantly variable pressure systems.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Posts
      431
      Country Flag: United States
      So for a TPI fuel system where the pressure stays pretty constant (at least mine does), a non-vacuum-referenced damper should be sufficient? The OEM one was certainly not that elaborate...
      1971 Camaro
      GM HT383, MiniRam EFI, AFR heads
      "8-speed" trans (700R4 + Gear Vendors OD)

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The City of Fountains
      Posts
      16,129
      Country Flag: United States
      This one seems to be inexpensive and easily adaptable:

      http://www.amazon.com/401-0012-Press...ds=fuel+damper

      Bill,

      If a damper is designed to be used in a system at 48psi, is there a danger of braking the damper if run at 58psi?

      Andrew
      Last edited by andrewb70; 02-02-2015 at 03:18 PM.
      1970 GTO Version 3.0
      1967 Cougar build
      GM High-Tech Performance feature
      My YouTube Channel Please Subscribe!
      Instagram @dr__efi
      I deliver what EFI promises.
      Remote Holley EFI tuning.
      Please get in touch if I can be of service.

      "You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets." ~ Her

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jun 2012
      Location
      South Lyon, MI
      Posts
      1,244
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by ULTM8Z View Post
      So for a TPI fuel system where the pressure stays pretty constant (at least mine does), a non-vacuum-referenced damper should be sufficient? The OEM one was certainly not that elaborate...
      Correct.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Jun 2012
      Location
      South Lyon, MI
      Posts
      1,244
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by andrewb70 View Post
      This one seems to be inexpensive and easily adaptable:

      http://www.amazon.com/401-0012-Press...ds=fuel+damper

      Bill,

      If a damper is designed to be used in a system at 48psi, is there a danger of braking the damper if run at 58psi?

      Andrew
      Andrew,

      It is very unlikely to break simply because the margin of safety most fuel system suppliers use. It may not work optimally though.

      There is a point where the damper is "bottomed out" and loses most of its effectiveness.

      Bill




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com