Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 22

    Thread: 4.8 Swap?

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Location
      Angier, NC, USA
      Posts
      56

      4.8 Swap?

      I did a search, "No search results." Has anyone done it? I dont see why not, you can get the 4.8 on the cheap, its got 270hp+ and with a turbo/supercharger it can do an easy 400hp+. So, has anyone done this? Any comments? Thanks, Bradley
      ~Bradley~

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      St Louis
      Posts
      453
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm assuming you're referring to the GM 4.8, 5.3, 6.0 series iron truck motors. I'm doing a 5.3 in a 72 cutlass now. Pretty much anything that applies to the 5.3 and 6.0 swaps will work for the 4.8. The 4.8s are really cheap but the 5.3s are about the same price and are available everywhere.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Location
      Angier, NC, USA
      Posts
      56
      Yeah, just wondering if anyone has done a 4.8 swap.
      ~Bradley~

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Long Beach, Ca
      Posts
      1,564
      Country Flag: United States
      I don't see why; the 5.3 will be the same price (unless you already have the 4.8), and will make more power with the same mods. A T70 turbo, cam/springs, and injectors will put you over 500 hp.
      Jon Rasmussen
      Ex Team OLJ.
      '72 Nova

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Beach Park IL
      Posts
      3,029
      Country Flag: United States
      400 plus hp is a camshaft and springs away with a late 5.3, way easier than a turbo and definitely cheaper in the long run.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Location
      Angier, NC, USA
      Posts
      56
      I like the mileage of a 4.8 though...
      ~Bradley~

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      St Louis
      Posts
      453
      Country Flag: United States
      LOL, that's what I say about going with the 5.3 instead of a 6.0 or 6.2. But hey, a 455 would get less than 10mpg, so anything is better than that for a DD.

      Quote Originally Posted by thirdstreettito View Post
      I like the mileage of a 4.8 though...

    8. #8
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      The milage difference b/w a 4.8 and a 5.3 is laughable. Get a 4.8 and put in a 5.3 crank. This makes a higher compression 5.3. Cam and springs and your done. 400-450 HP easy.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Location
      Angier, NC, USA
      Posts
      56
      Darn you tall man. Darn you. What kind of compression we talking? From what to what?
      ~Bradley~

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      St Louis
      Posts
      453
      Country Flag: United States
      You got me curious, so I looked up the milage ratings on a 4.8 vs 5.3 in the same vehicles. Best increase with the 4.8 was 1mpg city, and most highway ratings were the same for the two.
      The 4.8 and 5.3 share the same bore size. The longer stroke of the 5.3 will have more noticable torque. Go with the 5.3. My 05 with under 50k miles, accessories, harness, ecu, pedal, pump, etc and a 6 month warantee was under $900, shipped to me.

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Location
      Angier, NC, USA
      Posts
      56
      Thanks. 6'9"Witha69 still waiting for a compressions answer.
      ~Bradley~

    12. #12
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      IIRC it goes up to ~ 10.0-10.2:1. I would have to confirm with the buddy who did it exactly what it was. Reason being that the 4.8 has flat top pistons and the 5.3 uses dished, so OEM they have the same compression ratio despite their disparate displacments.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Location
      Angier, NC, USA
      Posts
      56
      Wait, the 4.8 stock has a 10:1 CR? Is the .2 worth it?
      ~Bradley~

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      St Louis
      Posts
      453
      Country Flag: United States
      Just a personal note on CR in these motors and some real life experience. The 5.3 and 4.8 have a 9.5:1 and run great on regular gas. My LQ9 with 10.1:1 CR reccomends premium. If I run regular in it, I can feel when the knock sensor trigger timing retard. I've heard from others the same thing and that the spark retard results in worse milage.
      If your goal is economy, raising the CR might be counterproductive in addition to the cost of the crank, rods, etc.



    15. #15
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      Hills of Anaheim
      Posts
      273
      Just finishing up a 5.3 in a Nova. Should be a fun little ride.
      Matt - 1970 Chevelle

      www.street-demons.com

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by garys 68 View Post
      Just a personal note on CR in these motors and some real life experience. The 5.3 and 4.8 have a 9.5:1 and run great on regular gas. My LQ9 with 10.1:1 CR reccomends premium. If I run regular in it, I can feel when the knock sensor trigger timing retard. I've heard from others the same thing and that the spark retard results in worse milage.
      If your goal is economy, raising the CR might be counterproductive in addition to the cost of the crank, rods, etc.
      Plus the OP mentioned a turbo/supercharger, so raising it more than stock is pushing beyond pump gas. Sounds like the ideal might be a stock 4.8L or 5.3L with a takeout camshaft from an LS2 and small single turbo would be a good combination fuel economy/power/cost effectiveness.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Long Beach, Ca
      Posts
      1,564
      Country Flag: United States
      The easiest way to make big power with a 5.3 is to run an early LS6 Z06 camshaft and springs, a t70 (or equivalent) turbo, intercooler, injectors, and maybe some water/meth for safety. That will put you near 550whp.
      Jon Rasmussen
      Ex Team OLJ.
      '72 Nova

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Location
      Angier, NC, USA
      Posts
      56
      Yeah, but I want to keep good mileage. A T56 will be behind the LS.
      ~Bradley~

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Long Beach, Ca
      Posts
      1,564
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by thirdstreettito View Post
      Yeah, but I want to keep good mileage. A T56 will be behind the LS.
      With a good tune you'll get better than stock mileage, if you can keep your foot out of it.
      Jon Rasmussen
      Ex Team OLJ.
      '72 Nova

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Location
      Angier, NC, USA
      Posts
      56
      Still have the power?
      ~Bradley~

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com