Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 20 of 20
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Feb 2009
      Location
      Long island, New York
      Posts
      668

      solid vs. poly motor mounts

      what do you guys prefer ?? my i have a 355 solid roller with a th350 trans approx 400hp , but will hopefully be converting to tko600 or t56 soon if that matters. let me know .-Dom
      Dom Buffa
      69 Camaro- 2JZ /Garrett 67MM, Ls1 13" Front disc conversion, 18" ROH 3 piece Modenas



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2008
      Location
      Pgh, PA
      Posts
      2,177
      Solid. Period. I had some MityMounts and replaced them with solid mounts. I was afraid that I'd have uncomfortable vibration, but frankly they have been superb. And I'm running a 462ci 11:1 stroked 600hp pontiac with a TKO600. Absolutely no down side that I can determine.
      '66 GTO Vert Project "Red Ink", 462ci of stroked pontiac power, TKO600, SC&C Stg II+, Tubular lowers, Currectrac Rear suspension, Moser 12bolt w/Truetrack, Wilwood Master and discs all around, too much fun for words...

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Feb 2009
      Location
      Long island, New York
      Posts
      668
      that`s what i was worried about with the solid mounts, do they raise the motor up because i have read that some do. what brand do u have? -Dom
      Dom Buffa
      69 Camaro- 2JZ /Garrett 67MM, Ls1 13" Front disc conversion, 18" ROH 3 piece Modenas



    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2008
      Location
      Pgh, PA
      Posts
      2,177
      Mine did not. I got mine from Butler Performance (remember, I've got a pontiac). I asked before ordering and was assured that the geometry was identical, and it sure appears to be. I actually wanted to slightly raise mine, so I made two thin places for between the crossmember and the lower mounts.

      I was VERY nervous because my motor sure isn't subtle. Yet to be honest I've completely forgotten that they're solid until I think about it - and they're way stronger.
      '66 GTO Vert Project "Red Ink", 462ci of stroked pontiac power, TKO600, SC&C Stg II+, Tubular lowers, Currectrac Rear suspension, Moser 12bolt w/Truetrack, Wilwood Master and discs all around, too much fun for words...

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Feb 2009
      Location
      Long island, New York
      Posts
      668
      OK good, because i definitely need the solid mounts, when i took the motor out last time the passenger side mount was in two pieces! the rubber separated itself from the lower mount. and that was with the stock 350 and now my motor was rebuilt and bored.60 over and a bigger cam and different heads, so it is now pushing about 400 when we had it on the dyno. also how do you like your tko600? and where did u get it .-Dom
      Dom Buffa
      69 Camaro- 2JZ /Garrett 67MM, Ls1 13" Front disc conversion, 18" ROH 3 piece Modenas



    6. #6
      Join Date
      Nov 2007
      Posts
      106
      I have a 350ci with about 400hp and pooly mounts. I have about 9000 miles on the car and I have had no problems at all.

      I also have a TKO600. Its one of the best upgrades I have have done yet. If I baby the throttle I can managed to get about 25mpg.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Belle Plaine, MN
      Posts
      1,221
      Country Flag: United States
      They don't all have to be the same, either.

      I run a solid mount on the driver's side, a (new) stock rubber mount on the passenger side, and a poly mount on the trans. Plenty strong, minimal vibration transfer.
      Scott Parkhurst


      2011 Car Craft Real Street Eliminator Winner

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Newbury Park, CA
      Posts
      5,837
      Country Flag: United States
      Modern polyurethane and stock-type rubber mounts have an interlocking feature that keeps them from coming apart like the early 60's versions.

      Solid is fine for either the motor or the transmission but not both. There needs to be some flexibility or else there is a high probability that the transmission tailshaft housing can break.
      VaporWorx. We Give You Gas http://www.vaporworx.com

    9. #9
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      I run solid motor and poly trans mounts. You will notice if anything is out of balance right away! But when everything is working (balanced), they are great. One less thing to worry about breaking. That and with headers that fit close to a steering box you know they will not hit due to tq twist pushing a tube into the steering box.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Burnaby, BC, Canada
      Posts
      1,388
      Anybody else running solid motor and tranny mounts? I've gone through 2 sets of poly motor mounts and 1 poly tranny mount and can't figure out why. Am going to swap over to solid and looking for opinions.
      1969 CAMARO RS

      2002 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 452 rwhp, 425 rwtq
      Project pics of my '69
      Lateral-G Feature Page
      Camaro Performers Magazine Feature

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2009
      Posts
      125
      Solid motor mounts with poly trans mount is always a good combination. Just never run solid motor and solid trans because you will break something.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Oct 2009
      Location
      Sleepy Hollow,IL
      Posts
      336
      On a 2nd gen F body, clam shell motor mounts are used. All most impossible to break. I had a 455 in my 75 TA with 575 hp.. I used the poly inserts in my stock clam shell shell. Worked awesome. Instead of the shaker shaking, now the whole car shakes. I have found the stiffer I makes things, the more rattles that pop up.
      Everything Under the Sun is Intune
      Chris
      http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea..._am/index.html

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      Westminster, MD
      Posts
      579
      Country Flag: United States
      My buddy has solid eng & trans mounts in his '69 Nova. It vibirates the heck out of you. I really think swapping to a poly trans mount would take care of it. I'm running poly mounts now and had them in my '91 Z & '70 Chevelle without issue.
      Ed Cooney
      '96 Buick Roadmaster Estate Wagon, LT1/4L60, full bolt-ons & Solomon's tune, 18" Ridler wheels, lowered with Belltech springs

      ‘70 Buick Skylark Convertible project w/ GN drivetrain

      '91 Formula, pending track day build


    14. #14
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Henderson,NV
      Posts
      2,870
      Country Flag: United States
      I like solids for racing but they aren't that great for cruising. You will feel all the harmonics. Some of the big block guys use a solid on the pull side and a rubber on the other.

      Todd


    15. #15
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Belle Plaine, MN
      Posts
      1,221
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
      Some of the big block guys use a solid on the pull side and a rubber on the other.

      Some small-block guys do too! LOL!

      A solid won't break, and a rubber will absorb harmonics. I've been running them this way for many years in many different cars. It works for me!
      Scott Parkhurst


      2011 Car Craft Real Street Eliminator Winner

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Tallahassee, FL
      Posts
      76
      I've been running solid motor mounts in all my cars since the 80's.
      (currently w/poly transmission mounts).
      No downside I could ever see, and never had to replace one.
      -Rich
      '72 Camaro RS/SS350: (ZZ383-TH350) Under Construction

      '88 IROC L98 (TPI 383-700R4)

      '70 VW Beetle (1600cc-Auto-Stick)

      '92 Camaro RS (Carbed 350-TKO)

      '04 Chevy Tahoe-Daily Driver (5.3-4L60E)

      '29 Ford Sedan (Carbed 350-T5 ...Grandpa's RatRod)

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Burnaby, BC, Canada
      Posts
      1,388
      Thanks guys, going to switch to solid motor mounts and get a new poly trans mount. Not sure why my car keeps killing poly motor mounts??
      1969 CAMARO RS

      2002 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 452 rwhp, 425 rwtq
      Project pics of my '69
      Lateral-G Feature Page
      Camaro Performers Magazine Feature

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Henderson,NV
      Posts
      2,870
      Country Flag: United States
      Are solid mounts a good idea with a knock sensor?
      Todd

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Location
      UK London
      Posts
      527
      How about stock mounts with a motor plate and adjustable pre load on connecting rods from the frame to the motor mount....



      Seems to work so far!!!!!

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Jul 2009
      Location
      Bear, DE
      Posts
      346
      Swapped out to solid motor mounts and will never go back, i love them!
      Jason Nichols
      '72 Chevy Nova-The Blue Bomb https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...972-Chevy-Nova




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com