Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 21
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Long Beach, Ca
      Posts
      1,564
      Country Flag: United States

      Too much roll stiffness?

      That is what I have been throwing around in my head about my Nova. My car seems to push pretty badly, and I would like to attribute it to too much front-end roll stiffness. My current setup is:

      Front:
      Hotchkis springs, gas-adjusts, poly bushings, and an Adco 1-1/8" solid bar. With 245 Nitto 555r

      Allignment is -1.5* cam., ~4.5* caster, and 1/8" toe in.

      Rear:
      Hotchkis leafs, and gas-adjusts, and no bar. With 285 Nitto 555r.

      And an Iron/Iron small block.

      I also have no sub-frame bushings, which brought the front of the car down ~3/8". Couple that with not having any of the heater elements (even controls and heater core box), or blower motor assembly, and just front seats. I have a feeling that with the front bar being solid and lack of front end weight, it is providing too much stiffness.

      What do you think?
      Jon Rasmussen
      Ex Team OLJ.
      '72 Nova

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2006
      Location
      San Francisco, CA
      Posts
      808
      Country Flag: United States
      Under what conditions does it push? Street, AutoX or Road Course?

      I don't think my understeer as as bad as yours, but I am definitely in a push on a track. I think you gotta work on front suspension geometry: upper control arms, maybe a taller spindle will help the camber curve. I've also been told to really crank up the camber for the track. I was at -1.0 deg, and need to go up to -2.5 to -3 degrees if possible.

      Concerning roll stiffness, I've also been told that you can replace 1 or more of the front sway bar poly bushings with rubber bushings to soften the effective rate of the bar. It's a cheap way to dial out some roll stiffness.
      Steven

      1968 Camaro: Project "TRACKDAY"

      Latest Track Weekend Video

      Build in Progress

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      A 1 1/8 front bar with no rear bar = push.

      I'd also consider less toe-in (maybe up to 1/16 toe out) for easier turn in. That will help you to get the car to rotate and might feel a lot better without spending money on a rear bar.

      jp

      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro


    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Long Beach, Ca
      Posts
      1,564
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by parsonsj View Post
      A 1 1/8 front bar with no rear bar = push.

      I'd also consider less toe-in (maybe up to 1/16 toe out) for easier turn in. That will help you to get the car to rotate and might feel a lot better without spending money on a rear bar.

      jp
      Won't that just affect how quickly the car responds to input? Will it provide more from end bite?

      And Sik, I have rubber mounts on the bar already.

      It pushes pretty much anytime I drive it hard, but more noticably on tight auto-cross.

      I was thinking more along the lines of switching to a hollow 1-1/8" bar? And maybe add a small bar in the rear? I can get my hands on a stock 4th gen F-body rear bar, I forget how big they are though...
      Jon Rasmussen
      Ex Team OLJ.
      '72 Nova

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2006
      Location
      San Francisco, CA
      Posts
      808
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Nessumsar View Post

      I was thinking more along the lines of switching to a hollow 1-1/8" bar? And maybe add a small bar in the rear? I can get my hands on a stock 4th gen F-body rear bar, I forget how big they are though...

      I think if you add a rear bar without correcting the problems at the front, you are balancing the car's handling by reducing traction at the rear to match the lack of traction at the front. Sure it will feel more balanced, but in a lower state of overall grip. So, depending on the definition of "handling", it may handle better, but perform worse.
      Steven

      1968 Camaro: Project "TRACKDAY"

      Latest Track Weekend Video

      Build in Progress

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Long Beach, Ca
      Posts
      1,564
      Country Flag: United States
      I wouldn't add a rear bar without changing something first.

      I will try changing up the alignment first, but I don't think that will be enough to counteract the understeer.

      If I did switch to a hollow bar, should it be of the same size? Or should I move down to a 1"? Maybe move to a 1" and add a small rear bar to keep the total roll stiffness up?
      Jon Rasmussen
      Ex Team OLJ.
      '72 Nova

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by John
      That will help you to get the car to rotate
      Quote Originally Posted by Jon
      Won't that just affect how quickly the car responds to input?
      Exactly.

      As for correcting the push, sounds like you're on the right track.

      jp
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Aug 2006
      Location
      San Francisco, CA
      Posts
      808
      Country Flag: United States
      Please post a followup after you do the alignment and your future changes as well. I am curious to hear how much of an effect it has on your handling. with -1 camber on my car, i was only using about 80% of the front tires' width going around corners. I had the tire wear patterns to prove it; my 245's became 205's around a corner. I'd love to also learn about how a your playing with sway bars affects understeer as well.

      -Steven
      Steven

      1968 Camaro: Project "TRACKDAY"

      Latest Track Weekend Video

      Build in Progress

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Long Beach, Ca
      Posts
      1,564
      Country Flag: United States
      With the allignment specs listed, at RTTC the tire was wearing right to the edge of the tread. I was getting all I could out of the tire. Which is what leads me to beleive it is a roll stiffness problem...

      Those are the specs that David Pozzi has listed on his site for a 1st gen Camaro w/o Gulstrand mod.
      Jon Rasmussen
      Ex Team OLJ.
      '72 Nova

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Mar 2002
      Location
      Redwood City, CA
      Posts
      1,895,413,640
      Country Flag: United States
      Jon, to keep it easy get an adjustable rear sway bar. A hollow 1 1/8" front bar is about equivalent to a 1" solid bar, so going hollow there would soften things up a bit. With the adjustable rear bar you can tune out some of the push. The rest may come with adjustable shocks and playing with your tire pressures.
      Allen Ortega
      Meanstreets Performance Fabrication

      ---------------------------------------

      Vegetarians are the reason for global warming

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      Central CA USA
      Posts
      6,114
      Country Flag: United States
      Jon.
      You can increase positive caster to 5 deg positive.
      Toe in can be reduced to near zero but you aren't going to notice any handling difference with any of these changes from where you are at now, they are too minor. One thing you will see is if the car has settled at all since your last alignment, the toe in will have increased a LOT due to the large amount of bumpsteer these cars have.

      The 1 1/8" solid front bar is HUGE on a 1st gen/Nova sub! I don't think there is a rear bar made that would be stiff enough to work with it. The adco bar is made to work with stock springs, so when stiffer springs are added, it's way too stiff in roll.

      Since you have Hotchkis springs, their bars would come closest to working well in a balanced package for you. A rear bar is a must, if you don't like the exhaust clearance of the narrow Hotchkis bar, their 2nd gen Camaro rear bar will fit.
      David
      Last edited by David Pozzi; 07-16-2010 at 05:14 PM.
      67 Camaro RS that will be faster than anything Mary owns.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      I agree, 1" solid max on these 1st gen F-X body frames and I would recommend a Speedtech/ATS tall spindle for it. Huge improvment for these cars over stock.

      Go for the 2nd gen bar and add the adjustability to the mix.


      Vince
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    13. #13
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      So. Cal.
      Posts
      1,240
      Country Flag: United States
      IMO yer push is coming from the un-balanced car. You have a decent amount of front stiffness, I wouldnt change that. Its not too tight. But the back is too loose. No bar.

      A light rear (rear roll stiffness) will exaggerate the front roll stiffness. So the front will push. Its taking all the lateral loads so it will be heavy at the front.

      Want to lighten it up at the front a lil? So the front isnt pushing so much? Put a rear bar in there.

      Pull the rear inside tire down some and the front outside tire wont see so much of a load. Reduced push.

      Now to an extent. You will skip the front loaded (outside) tire across the pavement if you arent careful. Then you are getting into oversteer. The front is too light and skipping over the road surface and the rear is firmly planted till she breaks loose.

      Now thats fun driving. I like an oversteering car. Just my thing. Well hell, I like an understeering plow too!! They are more predictable. I have pushed a few heavy understeering cars through the traps. Not as stressful.

      On the edge, a nice light (oversteering) car. Fun on a track, kinda fun till the rear end comes around on the street.

      Just about balance I think. JR
      What I write is opinion, none of it is factual. 2010

      Even though I'm conscious it doesn't mean I'm coherent. 2011

      I'm getting better with age. Best thing about old age is I don't know any better. 2012

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Newbury Park, CA
      Posts
      5,839
      Country Flag: United States
      A solid 1-1/8" bar is close to twice the stiffness as a typical hollow 1-1/8" bar. You've got double what Hotchkis intended for that spring.

      With the Guldstrand mod, even with -2* camber, outside tire wear is still a problem.
      VaporWorx. We Give You Gas http://www.vaporworx.com

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      Long Beach, Ca
      Posts
      1,564
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks for all of the input guys, I will see about switching out bars. Looks like a Hotchkis front and rear bar in my near future!
      Jon Rasmussen
      Ex Team OLJ.
      '72 Nova

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Pittsburgh Pa.
      Posts
      651
      Country Flag: United States
      Do you have the poly end link bushings on the bar too tight...

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Jun 2011
      Location
      yelm wa
      Posts
      46
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Nessumsar View Post
      Thanks for all of the input guys, I will see about switching out bars. Looks like a Hotchkis front and rear bar in my near future!
      sounds like that will balance things out...good thread!

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Location
      Roanoke (FortWorth) Texas
      Posts
      786
      I dont see it mentioned on here yet and its kind of a "doh!" kind of comment but... are you on the bump stops when hard cornering. I have a similar problem and think that is the primary contributor.
      Chris

      Total Cost Involved - Ridetech - Fatman - Total Control Products - Gateway Performance - MaverickMan Carbon

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Jun 2011
      Location
      yelm wa
      Posts
      46
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by GrabberGT View Post
      I dont see it mentioned on here yet and its kind of a "doh!" kind of comment but... are you on the bump stops when hard cornering. I have a similar problem and think that is the primary contributor.
      you could be right but honestly I don't think he would have to be with that Parthenon Column he's got up front there!

      Quote Originally Posted by CarlC View Post
      With the Guldstrand mod, even with -2* camber, outside tire wear is still a problem.
      HUH, I myslef am only running -1* maybe I should turn it up..shoot I'll get some caster out of it too!!! what do you recommend? I guess I could just turn it up until I get inside wear....i still need to install my overlength balljoints.
      sorry don't mean to change the topic....

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Jun 2011
      Location
      yelm wa
      Posts
      46
      Country Flag: United States
      sorry double post

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com