Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 14 of 14
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      Scottsdale AZ
      Posts
      294

      Taking a pole 18s or 19s on this 68 Camaro

      I am torn between running a 305/19 or a 315/18 on the rear of this car.

      Wheels will be satin black Forgeline GA3s.

      Give me your vote.

      Name:  IMG_5700.jpg
Views: 1503
Size:  162.4 KBName:  IMG_5695.jpg
Views: 1474
Size:  99.9 KBName:  IMG_5702.jpg
Views: 1511
Size:  110.6 KB

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Mar 2020
      Posts
      218
      Go with 18's, the sidewall will be very thin with 19's.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Mar 2022
      Location
      Florida
      Posts
      224
      I would do 18's as well. Much above that and the wheels start to look like a hot wheels car. Also, as mentioned, more sidewall. The wheel weight is less with 18's as well. Guys that run 20's on the street (vettes for looks), will run 18's on the track.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jul 2018
      Posts
      440
      255/40/18 & 325/30/19
      Name:  186520746_10227187039524108_3933803765205439946_n.jpg
Views: 1441
Size:  640.5 KBName:  186496836_10227187039844116_4167997002082089958_n.jpg
Views: 1417
Size:  556.4 KB

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      Scottsdale AZ
      Posts
      294
      Thank you for the input.

      Anyone else have any advise?

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Mountain Springs, Texas
      Posts
      4,871
      Country Flag: United States
      18/19 stagger. 295 and 345.

      Attached Images Attached Images  
      1969 Camaro - LSA 6L90E AME sub/IRS
      1957 Buick Estate Wagon
      1959 El Camino - Ironworks frame
      1956 Cameo - full C5 suspension/drivetrain
      1959 Apache Fleetside


    7. #7
      Join Date
      Mar 2022
      Location
      Florida
      Posts
      224
      I can get behind the staggered look!

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      New Jersey
      Posts
      564
      Country Flag: United States
      I went with the 18/19 staggered setup. I wanted to run a 325 tire and had limited options with an 18. That was like seven years ago. Could have changed.

      Rushforth wheels in my case.
      19x12. 5.75”BS 325/30/1
      18x9. 6”BS 275/35/18

      Name:  IMG_7480 2.jpg
Views: 593
Size:  220.0 KB
      Doug L.
      68 RS/SS Conv. LSA/T56.
      67 RS Coupe LS2/T56 named "NutKse"

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Nov 2018
      Posts
      993
      Country Flag: United States
      I disagree on staggered. Go square, and you can rotate. I'd also go with the smallest wheels that will clear the calipers. Big wheels with rubber band tires do not look right, and rubber is lighter than steel. A lighter overall wheel/tire combo will handle better and have a more comfortable ride.
      2021 Durango R/T
      2005 Dakota beater
      2003 Dakota project-o-mobile

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Celina, Texas
      Posts
      360
      Quote Originally Posted by dhutton View Post
      18/19 stagger. 295 and 345.


      I have this 295/345 staggered combo on a ‘68 and like it. It’s a lot of tire so the overall impression, to me, is “muscular-aggressive”, if that makes sense.

      The 275/335-18 combo has that awesome, lower, “sleek-performance” vibe. Steve’s “Dustoff” Camaro is my favorite example. It’s a popular combo but he just did it right.

      You’re talking 305/35/19 or 315/35/18, right? The difference in sidewall would be negligible at about 0.1”, so the 19’s won’t be like rubber bands. They’re one burnout away from being the same sidewall height.

      IMHO
      They’re actually so close that I’d choose the size that best fills the fenders for your ride height. I think the 18’s would look best, but only if you can get the fender within a couple fingers of the tire. If you’d have 3 fingers or more then go with the 19’s.

      The 18s are lower and wider. They’ll look best if you can lower the suspension to fill the fender gap. For some reason short/wide tires really magnify what fender gap you do have. The less top tread you see the better.

      Since the 19s are taller by almost 3/4” that height can help to fill the gap between the fender and top of the tire if lowering isn’t an option.

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      Scottsdale AZ
      Posts
      294
      Thank you everyone for your advise and input.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      Scottsdale AZ
      Posts
      294
      By the way. This car will keep its 60 inch wide stock width rear end. That should only make a difference in the lip width but thought I would mention it.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Mar 2020
      Posts
      218
      Here is my S10 with 305/30-19 in front & 305/35-19 rear.
      Gives you an idea of sidewall height.

      I only did this due to tire availability & front caliper clearance.
      Otherwise, I would have used 18's.

      Name:  IMG_1778.JPG
Views: 525
Size:  234.4 KB

      Name:  Side View.jpg
Views: 536
Size:  192.5 KB

    14. #14
      Join Date
      May 2020
      Posts
      25
      I would also go 18s on the Camaro; the additional side wall gives it a slightly better look. I also would go 18s all around versus the staggered so you can rotate them, unless you don't drive the car enough to rotate them and replace them when they get dry rot?




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com