Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 20 of 36

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Beach Park IL
      Posts
      3,056
      Country Flag: United States
      High revving engines tend to be peaky. There is no torque and then suddenly it will blow the tires off as the RPMs come up. It is difficult to drive a car like that.

      Take the engine with the flattest torque curve as it is the most predictable to drive.

      Donny

      Support your local hot rod shop!


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Sep 2014
      Posts
      25
      Country Flag: Canada
      Quote Originally Posted by Jonathonar89 View Post
      I would 99% of the time take the cubic inches. So many people are into the destroke idea but RPM capability has a lot to do with valvetrain stability more than bottom end. Look at LS engines for comparison. 6.2-7.0 liter LS engines make better power than 4.8-5.3 engines but the architecture is nearly the same.
      The key is combining them both. I'm currently considering a 6.2 block with a 4.8 crank for a total of 5.5 litres that'll rev to 8000 rpm and make about 600 horsepower naturally aspirated.

      https://www.motortrend.com/how-to/4-...pm-ls-stroker/

      Quote Originally Posted by dontlifttoshift View Post
      High revving engines tend to be peaky. There is no torque and then suddenly it will blow the tires off as the RPMs come up. It is difficult to drive a car like that.

      Take the engine with the flattest torque curve as it is the most predictable to drive.
      I've autocrossed a C6 Corvette Z06 and in no way was it peaky at all. It also wasn't difficult to drive and is very competitive. I liked how easy it was to drive at autocross, even on a tight course.
      Short and wide 1965 GMC 910.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com