Flaming River Rack and Pinon

[kimosabi]

I don't get the fascination of rack & pinion in 2nd gens. A good box with all links in order with a good subframe is slop free. If someone runs a rack & pinion in a 2nd gen and thinks it's way better I'd give huge credit to something called the placebo effect.

Rack & pinions are great for rear side of the spindle mounted steering arms and production cost. Mainly production cost.

I might sound grumpy and very subjective but so far I'm very happy with a tweaked steering box system. Feels just as quick and steady on the steering as my 2011 Subaru Legacy and thats good enough for me.

[SPG]

I don't get the fascination of rack & pinion in 2nd gens. A good box with all links in order with a good subframe is slop free. If someone runs a rack & pinion in a 2nd gen and thinks it's way better I'd give huge credit to something called the placebo effect.

Rack & pinions are great for rear side of the spindle mounted steering arms and production cost. Mainly production cost.

I might sound grumpy and very subjective but so far I'm very happy with a tweaked steering box system. Feels just as quick and steady on the steering as my 2011 Subaru Legacy and thats good enough for me.

People like it because there is (typically) less points of failure and can give you a better ratio in some instances.

Feel on the other hand is subjective and I don't care about that one way or another. I'm just trying to figure out if this is a good product, I don't really care about using a gear box as this is a thread just to figure it out, not asking for purchasing advice.

Plus I probably can't use this anyways as I think the input will interfere with the motor/accessory drive I will be putting in my car

[kimosabi]

People like it because there is (typically) less points of failure and can give you a better ratio in some instances.

Feel on the other hand is subjective and I don't care about that one way or another. I'm just trying to figure out if this is a good product, I don't really care about using a gear box as this is a thread just to figure it out, not asking for purchasing advice.

Plus I probably can't use this anyways as I think the input will interfere with the motor/accessory drive I will be putting in my car

There are some people on nastyz28 that have indeed installed rack & pinion in a 2nd gen so I struggle to believe you that "everone lost their mind" over it. Maybe not this type but the Unisteer R&P I know a few there have done it. If you want bolt on resale value this could be a hit or miss.

As for quality products they usually need some tweaks out of the box. That goes for every aftermarket part on the friggin planet. lol

[SPG]

There are some people on nastyz28 that have indeed installed rack & pinion in a 2nd gen so I struggle to believe you that "everone lost their mind" over it. Maybe not this type but the Unisteer R&P I know a few there have done it. If you want bolt on resale value this could be a hit or miss.

As for quality products they usually need some tweaks out of the box. That goes for every aftermarket part on the friggin planet. lol

people who did it, retro fitted it with parts from other cars, or use an after market subframe.
I'm not saying no one has done it, I just want to find someone who has used this one

[badazz81z28]

I don't get the fascination of rack & pinion in 2nd gens. A good box with all links in order with a good subframe is slop free. If someone runs a rack & pinion in a 2nd gen and thinks it's way better I'd give huge credit to something called the placebo effect.

Rack & pinions are great for rear side of the spindle mounted steering arms and production cost. Mainly production cost.

I might sound grumpy and very subjective but so far I'm very happy with a tweaked steering box system. Feels just as quick and steady on the steering as my 2011 Subaru Legacy and thats good enough for me.

So what’s the fascination in general? Seeing how it’s the automotive standard these days?

[kimosabi]

So what’s the fascination in general? Seeing how it’s the automotive standard these days?

Come on dude, you know why it's the automotive standard. Production cost. Less parts. Simpler design. Better option for placement in FWD cars. In many cases weight savings, although I don't think that applies to this Flaming River unit, with that big bracket and all.

Fascination? I'd say bling. R&P cars was made way earlier than they stopped using steering boxes. If a R&P steering was so much better don't you think the engineers at the automakers would have tossed the steering box design as soon as the R&P design showd up?

[Twentyover]

.....

Fascination? I'd say bling. R&P cars was made way earlier than they stopped using steering boxes. If a R&P steering was so much better don't you think the engineers at the automakers would have tossed the steering box design as soon as the R&P design showd up?

If they needed to redesign the front of the frame/ structural stampings to fit an R & P, No

If they needed to pay off capital costs of dedicated usually automated tooling and assembly equipment, No

Having worked in automotive design, my opinion is eating the costs to redesign and re-qualify a significant change (particularly regarding a safety related feature) leads to design inertia to keep a known proven design. The fact is that as significant structural redesigns occur (usually due to marketing considerations), engineers are usually more willing to consider significant design changes from previously released.

It amazes me. Prior to retirement, I worked in automotive HVAC design. I redesigned a component from specific RHD and LHD components to (separate injection mold tools) to a common design, 37% material savings and weight reduction, payoff in 1.3 years. The customer rejected the design change because the savings wasn't enough. Don't assume that decisions made in the industry are always rational.

Sorry for straying so far off topic, but the rational argument presented by kimosabi does not always work i real life

[badazz81z28]

Come on dude, you know why it's the automotive standard. Production cost. Less parts. Simpler design. Better option for placement in FWD cars. In many cases weight savings, although I don't think that applies to this Flaming River unit, with that big bracket and all.

Fascination? I'd say bling. R&P cars was made way earlier than they stopped using steering boxes. If a R&P steering was so much better don't you think the engineers at the automakers would have tossed the steering box design as soon as the R&P design showd up?

"Better" is usually a reason too even though the old products still get the job done. Honestly that's really the basis of a lot of argument on these forum over parts(aftermarket frames, 4-links, coil overs etc..etc..). Especially if you are someone in the industry selling the ole school parts (PTFB). You can't argue fuel injection offers many benefits over a carb and we all know if you break down the parts, its a more expensive system too. Yet even though ALL modern cars over the last 30 years are fuel injected, they still sell carbs. Also when cars became fuel injection, Carbs didn't come to an immediate halt. It takes time to become the standard...Does that mean FI isnt that great? No...There are better products out there that offer benefits. Just don't be so quick to discount them because the old parts work. "Less parts" "Simpler design" alone is something I like to have...Less areas of potential failure. I can say however my R&P on my DSE frame is a significant difference over the gear box on the stock frame. On a box, there are alot of moving ball joints, friction and of course that affects how smooth the system operates. JMO.

[kimosabi]

If they needed to redesign the front of the frame/ structural stampings to fit an R & P, No

If they needed to pay off capital costs of dedicated usually automated tooling and assembly equipment, No

Having worked in automotive design, my opinion is eating the costs to redesign and re-qualify a significant change (particularly regarding a safety related feature) leads to design inertia to keep a known proven design. The fact is that as significant structural redesigns occur (usually due to marketing considerations), engineers are usually more willing to consider significant design changes from previously released.

It amazes me. Prior to retirement, I worked in automotive HVAC design. I redesigned a component from specific RHD and LHD components to (separate injection mold tools) to a common design, 37% material savings and weight reduction, payoff in 1.3 years. The customer rejected the design change because the savings wasn't enough. Don't assume that decisions made in the industry are always rational.

Sorry for straying so far off topic, but the rational argument presented by kimosabi does not always work i real life

That was my point. If the rack & pinion was much better, in addition to weight, cost and simplicity, then it would be very hard for a customer to say no. You share some great points about the industry but take 3rd Gen F body as an example. Total redesign of the whole model, but still recirculating ball steering box. I don't work in the industry but I would still assume any automaker about to launch a new performance oriented model, would incorporate a different, cheaper, lighter and simpler in a heartbeat, if it was that much better.

"Better" is usually a reason too even though the old products still get the job done. Honestly that's really the basis of a lot of argument on these forum over parts(aftermarket frames, 4-links, coil overs etc..etc..). Especially if you are someone in the industry selling the ole school parts (PTFB). You can't argue fuel injection offers many benefits over a carb and we all know if you break down the parts, its a more expensive system too. Yet even though ALL modern cars over the last 30 years are fuel injected, they still sell carbs. Also when cars became fuel injection, Carbs didn't come to an immediate halt. It takes time to become the standard...Does that mean FI isnt that great? No...There are better products out there that offer benefits. Just don't be so quick to discount them because the old parts work. "Less parts" "Simpler design" alone is something I like to have...Less areas of potential failure. I can say however my R&P on my DSE frame is a significant difference over the gear box on the stock frame. On a box, there are alot of moving ball joints, friction and of course that affects how smooth the system operates. JMO.

Point is, a rack & pinion installed on an steering box old horse won't make it a grand prix winner. If people want to buy it thats their business but turning 41 and probably spent hundred thousand in performance parts and custom stuff over the years, I would just conclude all upgrades like that are not really upgrades. More like sidegrades with small changes. Most would experience much bigger benefits with getting a set of soft tires.