Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 12 of 12
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Posts
      83

      Drop Spindles and Control Arm Compatiblity

      Does anyone know if Global West '67 A Body control arms work with Heidts or Ride Tech Tall Spindles? I'm pretty sure they will, just looking for confirmation. Thanks in advance!


      "The New Black" 2006 Black Z06 -- 534 rwhp
      2009 Shelby GT500 -- 700rwhp
      *Project Miss Murder* 1967 Gold Chevelle Malibu -- Supercharged LS2/T56
      *Lady Lightning* 1970 Sublime Green Dodge Charger RT Clone
      1963 Pontiac Catalina Wagon
      1965 Impala


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jul 2008
      Location
      Ft. Worth, TX
      Posts
      419
      I am wondering the same thing. I have a 71 with the G-plus GW control arms with stock spindles. I am looking to switch to a stock style drop/tall spindle.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Posts
      83
      I've emailed both ridetech and Heidts... we'll see if I can get an answer.
      "The New Black" 2006 Black Z06 -- 534 rwhp
      2009 Shelby GT500 -- 700rwhp
      *Project Miss Murder* 1967 Gold Chevelle Malibu -- Supercharged LS2/T56
      *Lady Lightning* 1970 Sublime Green Dodge Charger RT Clone
      1963 Pontiac Catalina Wagon
      1965 Impala

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jun 2009
      Location
      Central FL
      Posts
      1,231
      I believe Heidts say "Will only work with Heidt's Control Arms" or something similar. No clue on ridetech's.
      Dan
      1968 Camaro v2
      LS6 :: Viper T56 :: C5 Brakes :: Hotchkis Suspension


    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jul 2008
      Location
      Ft. Worth, TX
      Posts
      419
      Sounds good. I sent an email to GW, maybe they will know.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Posts
      83
      Heidts contacted me and told they are a no go.
      "The New Black" 2006 Black Z06 -- 534 rwhp
      2009 Shelby GT500 -- 700rwhp
      *Project Miss Murder* 1967 Gold Chevelle Malibu -- Supercharged LS2/T56
      *Lady Lightning* 1970 Sublime Green Dodge Charger RT Clone
      1963 Pontiac Catalina Wagon
      1965 Impala

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      PA.
      Posts
      935
      Country Flag: United States
      It`s not so much the brand of A arms that matters but their configuration. Those intended for tall spindles and performance alignment will be shorter than stock (as the tall spindle raises the UCA it also causes it to swing outward in it`s arc of movement adding lots of + camber), have more offset toward the firewall (for more + caster) and have a flatter ball joint mounting pad (to prevent the ball joints from running out of travel and binding in bump). Those intended for the old B body swap will be shorter still because that spindle has more ball joint axis inclination than stock and tall aftermarket A body spindles. While they may work it may be a real challenge to properly align the car when using aftermarket tall spindles. The drop of the spindle doesn`t really affect UCA fit but the overall height sure does. The short answer is the GW arms intended for stock spindles won`t work out well at all, the ones intended for the B spindle swap will usually work alright (proper alignment depends on the rest of the set up), the ones for the Cat5 (same spindle but much more aggressive alignment) will usually cause you to run very severe race -camber settings when used with aftermarket A body tall spindles. It varies car to car and set up to set up but that`s the gist of it. Mark SC&C

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Posts
      83
      So, you're saying the best bet now is like an AFX stock spindle (since I want big brakes). What about a spindle like the tall AFX that has less than 1" of drop, that should be more manageable than the 2" drop, correct?


      Quote Originally Posted by Marcus SC&C View Post
      It`s not so much the brand of A arms that matters but their configuration. Those intended for tall spindles and performance alignment will be shorter than stock (as the tall spindle raises the UCA it also causes it to swing outward in it`s arc of movement adding lots of + camber), have more offset toward the firewall (for more + caster) and have a flatter ball joint mounting pad (to prevent the ball joints from running out of travel and binding in bump). Those intended for the old B body swap will be shorter still because that spindle has more ball joint axis inclination than stock and tall aftermarket A body spindles. While they may work it may be a real challenge to properly align the car when using aftermarket tall spindles. The drop of the spindle doesn`t really affect UCA fit but the overall height sure does. The short answer is the GW arms intended for stock spindles won`t work out well at all, the ones intended for the B spindle swap will usually work alright (proper alignment depends on the rest of the set up), the ones for the Cat5 (same spindle but much more aggressive alignment) will usually cause you to run very severe race -camber settings when used with aftermarket A body tall spindles. It varies car to car and set up to set up but that`s the gist of it. Mark SC&C
      "The New Black" 2006 Black Z06 -- 534 rwhp
      2009 Shelby GT500 -- 700rwhp
      *Project Miss Murder* 1967 Gold Chevelle Malibu -- Supercharged LS2/T56
      *Lady Lightning* 1970 Sublime Green Dodge Charger RT Clone
      1963 Pontiac Catalina Wagon
      1965 Impala

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      Beach Park IL
      Posts
      3,053
      Country Flag: United States
      It's not the drop that causes problems, it's the height of the spindle.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Posts
      83
      Yeah, I misread that.

      Quote Originally Posted by dontlifttoshift View Post
      It's not the drop that causes problems, it's the height of the spindle.
      "The New Black" 2006 Black Z06 -- 534 rwhp
      2009 Shelby GT500 -- 700rwhp
      *Project Miss Murder* 1967 Gold Chevelle Malibu -- Supercharged LS2/T56
      *Lady Lightning* 1970 Sublime Green Dodge Charger RT Clone
      1963 Pontiac Catalina Wagon
      1965 Impala

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Posts
      83
      Ok, after some more research... the Global West G Plus arms (which I am running) will be fine with drop spindles. I don't know why I didn't see them on their site to begin with. This is what I found about the GW G-Plus control arms on another site:

      The arms have additional caster built into the them and a improved camber curve. http://www.wotperformance.com/store/...cat=265&page=1
      "The New Black" 2006 Black Z06 -- 534 rwhp
      2009 Shelby GT500 -- 700rwhp
      *Project Miss Murder* 1967 Gold Chevelle Malibu -- Supercharged LS2/T56
      *Lady Lightning* 1970 Sublime Green Dodge Charger RT Clone
      1963 Pontiac Catalina Wagon
      1965 Impala

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Posts
      83
      Mark,

      Saw your post here: http://www.chevelles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=215205

      Good information. This should help those people out there still wondering.
      I do have the CTA-42's so all is good.
      "The New Black" 2006 Black Z06 -- 534 rwhp
      2009 Shelby GT500 -- 700rwhp
      *Project Miss Murder* 1967 Gold Chevelle Malibu -- Supercharged LS2/T56
      *Lady Lightning* 1970 Sublime Green Dodge Charger RT Clone
      1963 Pontiac Catalina Wagon
      1965 Impala




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com