Results 21 to 34 of 34
Thread: Brake line pressures
-
06-30-2011 #21
Dustin at Wilwood said pressures aren't that off for the calipers, not sure why the rear is reduced unless the MC has some internal metering.Theri MC do not but some factory ones do. Suggested a larger to get less travel but may be at the expense of leg effort.
So with a long weekend looks like I wil be trying a few things out in the heat of the garage. Might try swapping front and rear ports and see if the one port still is putting out less pressure
1978 Black Trans Am 455 Edelbrock heads [email protected] through mufflers on pump gas
1981 Trans Am 400 stock type motor
79 Camaro getting a 500" 695 hp IA2 Pontiac motor
1965 GTO project car
470ci/Chevy dual quad 409 604 HP 64 Impala SS project
2004 Pulse Red GTO
-
07-01-2011 #22From Wilwood's site on their master
CALCULATING EFFECTIVE PISTON BORE AREA TO DETERMINE PLUMBING
To determine the effective piston bore area of any caliper, you must first calculate the area for each piston bore found on one
side of the caliper. Use the formula " Area = (bore x bore) x .785" for each piston bore size. Then, add the areas of all pistons
on that one side of the caliper to determine the total effective piston bore area. Compare the difference between the front and
rear calipers and attach the line from the primary outlet "A" to the calipers at the end of the vehicle with the greater total
effective piston bore area.
So where do they get the .785? I though area sq in was pi(3.1416) x r x r with r being 1/2 bore
Their masters do have different volumes for the different ports so maybe that is the issue with mine.1978 Black Trans Am 455 Edelbrock heads [email protected] through mufflers on pump gas
1981 Trans Am 400 stock type motor
79 Camaro getting a 500" 695 hp IA2 Pontiac motor
1965 GTO project car
470ci/Chevy dual quad 409 604 HP 64 Impala SS project
2004 Pulse Red GTO
07-01-2011 #23
07-01-2011 #24Matt thanks I see that now that you point it out,any thoughts on the ordeal here?
In looking at Wilwood's site their MC do have the same pressure but also one end only moves half the volume. I would assume the Vette one does also. Maybe why the rear isn't building the pressure the front is.1978 Black Trans Am 455 Edelbrock heads [email protected] through mufflers on pump gas
1981 Trans Am 400 stock type motor
79 Camaro getting a 500" 695 hp IA2 Pontiac motor
1965 GTO project car
470ci/Chevy dual quad 409 604 HP 64 Impala SS project
2004 Pulse Red GTO
07-02-2011 #25From Strange's site on their MCs Mopar style so pressures in the ball park for lockup but reversed. Still alot of travel to get.
PEDAL / HANDLE RATIO
1.032” bore master cylinder: Pedal ratio- 5.5 to 1 / Handle ratio- 11 to 1
1.125” bore master cylinder: Pedal ratio- 6.5 to 1 / Handle ratio- 13 to 1
The 1.032” master cylinder is recommended for systems using single piston or two piston calipers up front, and four
piston calipers in the rear.The 1.125” master cylinder is used with four piston calipers in both the front and rear. Brake
pressure should always be checked with a brake pressure gauge before use. In disc brake applications used for drag
racing only, front brake pressure should be 550 to 650 lbs. and rear brake pressure 1,000 to 1,100 lbs.These pressures
should be achieved with a lot of effort since they are at “lock-up”of the tires and the actual normal stopping pressures
will be lower.
Question for you all if most of these aftermarket MC have a 2:1 volume output difference why have the same size reservoir? And if pistonsizes are the same(4 piston front and rear liek many aftermarket and early Vette) does it matter if the small is on the front or rear?1978 Black Trans Am 455 Edelbrock heads [email protected] through mufflers on pump gas
1981 Trans Am 400 stock type motor
79 Camaro getting a 500" 695 hp IA2 Pontiac motor
1965 GTO project car
470ci/Chevy dual quad 409 604 HP 64 Impala SS project
2004 Pulse Red GTO
07-02-2011 #26



Reply With Quote