Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 23

    Thread: Ride Height

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      Apex, NC
      Posts
      1,020
      Country Flag: United States

      Ride Height

      What is the lowest ride height recommended on the street? I am thinking of going 5" and just wondered what others thought.



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Apr 2009
      Location
      san diego
      Posts
      5,101
      Country Flag: United States

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      Hills of Anaheim
      Posts
      273
      5" what? From the frame?
      Matt - 1970 Chevelle

      www.street-demons.com

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Location
      knoxville, tn
      Posts
      273
      Country Flag: United States
      nahhhh....there was a mountain dew can laying on it's side in the middle of my street a couple of days ago. I straddled it with the 69, but the scattershield still hit it.....get the picture?
      Tom Hensley
      69 ss/rs clone
      98 ta ragtop

      "attack life....it's going to kill you anyway."


    5. #5
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      Apex, NC
      Posts
      1,020
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by THE TECH View Post
      5" what? From the frame?
      Yes

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Sep 2009
      Location
      Issaquah, Wa
      Posts
      97
      My 73 is at about 4.5" and it has some issues over speed bumps. I would leave it at 5"

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Location
      alpine ca
      Posts
      657
      Country Flag: United States
      i got a funny true story no names so i will protect the idiot but I,ME had a toyota truck hey i was 19 back in 89-90 that when 2 guys were in the cab and one in the bed it would take out reflectors in the road with no bags(they are for groceries)
      john
      1972 NOVA SPEED TECH TORQUE ARM AND FRONT ARMS , RUSHFORTH NIGHT TRAINS, DRIVERZ INC
      BUILD LINK
      https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...t-(GREY-MATTER)

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2002
      Location
      state of confusion
      Posts
      1,499
      Country Flag: United States
      Couple of practical considerations . . .

      It's nice to be able to get the jack in place if you have one flat.

      It's really nice to not be scraping anything if you have two flats (preferably any two, but at least a same-side pair). Some places and sanctioning bodies may actually require some version of this.


      Edit and FWIW, I've had a car with an aftermarket front sta-bar that would just barely clear the skinny Coors cans but all of the Bud/Coke/etc. ones were dead targets. Eventually I got tired of repairing the bar's chassis brackets or fabbing up new ones.


      Norm
      '08 GT coupe, 5M, suspension unstockish (the occasional track toy)
      '19 WRX, Turbo-H4/6M (the family sedan . . . seriously)
      Gone but not forgotten dep't:
      '01 Maxima 20AE 5M, '10 LGT 6M, '95 626, V6/5M; '79 Malibu, V8/4M-5M; '87 Maxima, V6/5M; '72 Pinto, I4/4M; '64 Dodge V8/3A

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Oct 2008
      Location
      Santa Fe Springs, CA
      Posts
      625
      Crestonwizard,
      People usually gauge ground clearance by the distance between the asphalt and the lowest part of the car, which is typically the headers. If you lower your car too much, you can put your front suspension in a portion of the suspension travel arc that is not optimum. Every car is different depending on the make and model and what modifications you’ve made to the suspension. Many people sacrifice the optimum suspension geometry for ultra-low stance.

      Here’s a 69 Camaro with a 3” front and rear drop using Hotchkis springs.



      We see many cars on the road with 3” of ground clearance, which really isn’t much clearance. Having 5” of clearance is much more streetable. What kind of car are you working on?
      Hotchkis Sport Suspension
      Toll Free: 877-466-7655

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Mantorville, MN
      Posts
      835
      Country Flag: United States
      I have put over 25000 miles on my car with only 3-1/2" to the lowest parts (front crossmember, exhaust, and trans pan were all at the same height). I've only scraped twice, and neither time was a big deal.
      Derek Kiefer,
      Mantorville, MN

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jan 2010
      Location
      Elk River, MN
      Posts
      676
      Quote Originally Posted by Derek69SS View Post
      I have put over 25000 miles on my car with only 3-1/2" to the lowest parts (front crossmember, exhaust, and trans pan were all at the same height). I've only scraped twice, and neither time was a big deal.
      That's a good point, because ride height is really subjective based one where you live and what the roads are like. I was talking to Marc Savitske about this a week or so ago, when they road-race in Mexico, 5" is a minimum, any less than that and the rough roads will tear your car apart. Just something to think about, but if all the roads in your area are perfect, a lower ride height than 5" might be acceptable.

      -matt

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Mantorville, MN
      Posts
      835
      Country Flag: United States
      We're both in MN, when is the last time you saw a "perfect" road?
      Derek Kiefer,
      Mantorville, MN

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      USA
      Posts
      4,462
      Country Flag: United States
      My Camaro is 3.5" to the header flange .
      I have scraped just a little , every once in a while , on speed bumps .
      And I have scraped when I dropped a tire off into a hole , on the shoulder of the road , in a corner ..
      Jeff Tate
      U.S.A.
      "The best thing about participating in these events is that you get to hang out with a group of intelligent like minded people who live to achieve things in their lives. You won't find a lazy, mean, or dumb bone in their bodies." Bret Voelkel, RideTech

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Jan 2010
      Location
      Elk River, MN
      Posts
      676
      Quote Originally Posted by Derek69SS View Post
      We're both in MN, when is the last time you saw a "perfect" road?
      Haha I'm not sure exactly, but I'm pretty sure I was out-of-state at the time My car will be at 5" ride height

      -matt

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Posts
      1,607
      Country Flag: United States
      Just saw this - apparently the vette guys deal w this all the time...

      http://www.customcorvetteaccessories...fattdaddy.html
      Ron in SoCal
      69 Camaro in progress
      http://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=31246

      Used to be known as flash911

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Jun 2010
      Location
      Northern Minnesota
      Posts
      231
      Country Flag: United States
      I agree with the MN boys above.
      It all depends where you live and your roads. Right now i have a frost heave down the road that if I'm going over 45 mph will take out the headers on my Mustang (7". i know the car sits to high). she comes down HARD.
      when i do drop the car it Will only be 2" as any lower would make it really hard for me to daily drive it.
      now if it was a track only car, thats a different story.

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Posts
      709
      If headers are your measure of acceptable ride height, they suck. I went through this issue for months, going from four-tubes to tri-Ys. Then, I had the pipes welded to the collectors on the tri-Ys (removed flanges), so the stupid flanges wouldn't scrape on lovely CA freeway messes under heavy suspension compression. Then, I said headers are just too stupid to deal with on a daily basis. Cast iron manifolds rule (or shorty headers, if you can make them fit)... Somebody needs to do a thread on how many pointless pains are caused by headers...

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Mar 2010
      Location
      GR Michigan
      Posts
      105
      Country Flag: United States
      X2 on the manifolds. IMO there is not enough gain when running full exhaust to justify the butt pains involved with running headers.
      Jeff

      73 Mustang Convertible

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Oct 2010
      Location
      S.G.V. SoCal
      Posts
      36
      not here to offend anyone but IMO..........
      "if u aint scraping, u aint sh*t!"
      thats my modo & im sticking to it....

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Feb 2002
      Location
      Springfield, MO
      Posts
      4,470
      Country Flag: United States
      https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...rst-gen-camaro

      Here is a little discussion on ride height also
      Jimmy

      69 Camaro Twin Turbo'd
      58 Nomad 348 Baby Rat

      http://www.fquick.com/shmoov69


    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


    Tags for this Thread


    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com