Results 1 to 13 of 13
-
02-23-2011 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Elk River, MN
- Posts
- 676
Perfecting Bumpsteer - Shimmed Balljoint/Tierod Taper?
I'm sure I'll get some negative feedback on this idea, but the more I think about it, the more sense it makes, especially if done properly and safely. If it's been done I apologize, but I couldn't find anything about it on Google or searching here.
Let's say you need to change the pin height of a ball joint or tie rod pin by .050", or some other number not available by just replacing the pin. Often with tie rods you're stuck with what you've got.
Well, running the model in CAD, a .009" shim between the taper of the pin and spindle (10 degree taper in this instance) would yield a height change of .100", or a .004" shim would give you a .050" change in pin height. Obviously you'd want to somehow lock these in place, but other than that, do you see an issue? My gut says that the tension of torquing the nut would be enough to hold it in place, but if not some small tabs could be added. You wouldn't want to change the height too much this way, since it moves the acting cross-section of the pin to a smaller part of the taper, but I think it could be a handy trick for fine-tuning bumpsteer on factory draglink steering systems.
-mattMatt Peterson 84 Monte Carlo - Sold :( | 99 Corvette Racecar | 2001 Z06 Daily Driver
https://www.pro-touring.com/showthre...ng-Bertha-Back
http://ls1tech.com/forums/conversions-hybrids/1499192-84-monte-5-3-build.html
https://www.pro-touring.com/threads/...rvette-Racecar



Reply With Quote