Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 17 of 17
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Posts
      81

      Performance advantages of staggered wheels?

      Hey all, this may sound silly but:
      Are there performance advantages to having a staggered wheel fitment (19s in back, 18s in front, etc.) or this strictly an aesthetic issue? I suspect performance is affected more by suspension components and wheel/tire width than by having a larger diameter wheel in the back...love the look, just curious from a practical standpoint! Thanks!


      Kevin Matthews

      My ride: '71 Buick Riviera named "Delilah"...because she drains me of energy and I had hair when I bought her...



      AIM HIGHER, DIE TRYIN
      '


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jun 2007
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      1,611
      Country Flag: United States
      A larger diameter wheel typically weighs more, so I would say that it is purely asthetics....
      JC Scott


    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Mountain View, CA
      Posts
      9,583
      Country Flag: United States
      I was staggering around downtown last night. It was not a performance advantage.

      As for the wheels, aesthetic. I don't care for it, but many do.
      True T.

      Whats new with Project 1/2-Trak?


      Follow my wisecracks on Sports, Food, Politics and other BS on Twitter.

      My blog

      When they kick out your front door, How you gonna come?
      With your hands on your head, Or on the trigger of your gun?

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jun 2007
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      1,611
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Damn True View Post
      I was staggering around downtown last night. It was not a performance advantage.

      As for the wheels, aesthetic. I don't care for it, but many do.
      Too many Zimas will do that to you..... lol
      JC Scott


    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Rustburg, Virginia
      Posts
      3,436
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Damn True View Post
      I was staggering around downtown last night. It was not a performance advantage.

      As for the wheels, aesthetic. I don't care for it, but many do.
      Plus it makes the car look funny when you rotate the tires...Bwhahahaha
      1970 RS/SS350 139K on the clock:
      89 TPI motor w/ 1pc rear seal coupled to a Viper T56 via Mcleod's modular bellhousing w/ hydraulic T/O bearing from the Viper, 12 bolt rear w/ 3.73 gearing, SC&C upper control arms, factory lowers with Delalums, C5 brakes at all four corners, Front Wheels 17x8's with Sumi 255/40/17 and Rear Wheels 17x9's with Sumi 275/40/17.
      Brief description of the work done so far can be found here: http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112454


    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jan 2010
      Location
      Elk River, MN
      Posts
      676
      I prefer the same size wheel/tire all around, but that's just me.

      I believe "staggered" also refers to a setup where the rear wheels/tires are wider than the front. Whether a rear tire wider than the front is advantageous will depend on your particular car, but obviously there is a very basic advantage to having the widest tires that will fit under your ride.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Location
      Austin, TX
      Posts
      243
      Country Flag: United States
      There are a lot discussions on this topic. Some believe it does and others believe it does not. For driving around town most likely it will never make a difference. On a track some believe "it can help with turn and brake nose dive". You really will have to do a internet search and start reading. I have no idea if anyone has complete test data to provide on it or not.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Greenwood, SC
      Posts
      2,314
      Quote Originally Posted by AM.MSCL View Post
      On a track some believe "it can help with turn and brake nose dive".

      I can't imagine how that would work...

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Oct 2009
      Location
      Sleepy Hollow,IL
      Posts
      336
      I think anything over 18's are a waste for racing. Purely aesthetic. I think the widest and lightest wheels are the best way to go. If 17's work, I wouldn't go any bigger. Rims and tires are more money the larger you go.
      Everything Under the Sun is Intune
      Chris
      http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea..._am/index.html

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jan 2010
      Location
      Elk River, MN
      Posts
      676
      Quote Originally Posted by Taman View Post
      I think anything over 18's are a waste for racing. Purely aesthetic. I think the widest and lightest wheels are the best way to go. If 17's work, I wouldn't go any bigger. Rims and tires are more money the larger you go.
      Agreed, to some extent. Go with the biggest practical brakes you can afford, and buy wheels to fit over them ;)

      If it weren't for my 13" rotors, I'd probably go with 15 or 16" wheels. Far as I'm concerned, there really isn't any other reason to go with wheels bigger than what will clear your brakes. Depending on what the car is, 20's are overkill for most anything, and the 24's that all the ballers are running look stupid IMHO. Unfortunately now we have OEM's putting the biggest damn wheel they can fit on every car, so they don't look proportionally right with anything less than 20's.....

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Posts
      81
      Quote Originally Posted by John Wright View Post
      Plus it makes the car look funny when you rotate the tires...Bwhahahaha
      Yeah, but eventually you'd have the two fatties on one side which could be killer on a circle track!

      But...I've never been a fan of the 20"s myself. I had to convince myself of 19"s on the rear, but the Buick is almost a 20 footer so it can handle it...and I'd still have room for some decent sidewall. I was curious about the handling implications of the 19/18 combo, so thanks for the input.
      Kevin Matthews

      My ride: '71 Buick Riviera named "Delilah"...because she drains me of energy and I had hair when I bought her...



      AIM HIGHER, DIE TRYIN
      '

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      18 / 19 is fine. Many new performance cars come with even 20s. one of the baddest Camaros around is Jackasss and it runs factory ZR1 wheels (bigger then 18s). On street tires he handed race tired cars their ass at Motorstate, so the days of "19s and 20s won;t handle are long gone.

      On your Riv, the car is so big it willswallow 18s and 19s like they are 15s. I am doing a 65 Riv and it will have much bigger wheels.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Posts
      81
      Quote Originally Posted by ProdigyCustoms View Post
      18 / 19 is fine. Many new performance cars come with even 20s. one of the baddest Camaros around is Jackasss and it runs factory ZR1 wheels (bigger then 18s). On street tires he handed race tired cars their ass at Motorstate, so the days of "19s and 20s won;t handle are long gone.

      On your Riv, the car is so big it willswallow 18s and 19s like they are 15s. I am doing a 65 Riv and it will have much bigger wheels.
      Hey Frank, good to hear from you again. I've got 17's on it now and they look like roller skate wheels. They actually looked big to me at one time! I'm going to take you up on the project-planning offer. You guys seem to be the "go-to" people for this stuff. The first thing on my list is suspension. I've gotta start somewhere, and that seems most logical...I'm hearing a lot of stuff that fits the Chevelles/Cutlass/Skylarks will fit the Riv. Next, probably do the front brakes first while I figure what to do about the rear drums. Then the wheels...finally found some that I like that will fit. A piece at a time I say. Anyway, hit me back via PM and I'll shoot you my email address. Thanks a ton.
      Kevin Matthews

      My ride: '71 Buick Riviera named "Delilah"...because she drains me of energy and I had hair when I bought her...



      AIM HIGHER, DIE TRYIN
      '

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      PMs are horrible for me, i get so many i cannot keep up!

      Hit me up on email at [email protected].

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Boston MA
      Posts
      686
      If you're talking about "performance", you're talking about "racing". In racing it's simple; for a given permitted width it's the lightest weight and smallest frontal area. If you're limited by suspension, you add a little side wall. When you see a race car with 30# 18"s and 19"s on it, let me know. There's a gaggle of old cars on 15" that'll peel it's cap.
      1967 #s RS

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Dec 2009
      Posts
      81
      Quote Originally Posted by ProdigyCustoms View Post
      PMs are horrible for me, i get so many i cannot keep up!

      Hit me up on email at [email protected].
      Email coming your way...thanks a ton!
      Kevin Matthews

      My ride: '71 Buick Riviera named "Delilah"...because she drains me of energy and I had hair when I bought her...



      AIM HIGHER, DIE TRYIN
      '

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Nov 2009
      Location
      Jacksonville NC
      Posts
      400
      Country Flag: United States
      I think its more of a personal taste if anything...




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com