Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 13 of 13
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Austin, Texas
      Posts
      17

      Hydraulic roller or solid ?

      I am in the process of builing a motor at CNC performance and I have the choice of a Comp cam Hydraulic roller or a solid cam. I have started with them building it using the Comp Cams Hydraulic Mutha Thumper Part # 249-12-601-8 . Right now we are making 573 HP and 537 TQ on a engine dyno. They called me today and asked if I wanted to change to a solid roller with a .622 lift cam. They have dyno'd a similar engine today with the solid and make 636hp and 569 TQ.

      I would love to have the extra power but I am worried and dependability and drivabilty. It is in a 1972 Camaro with a TKO 500 5 sp with 342 rear gears.

      Any advise?

      Thanks,



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Austin, Texas
      Posts
      17
      The enigine is SBC 422 with 10.6/1 comp and AFR 210 heads.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      At .622 lift I'm worried about the lifespan of the valve springs

      What durations are you looking at with the solid roller?
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Location
      Denver
      Posts
      325
      Country Flag: United States
      I am sure someone more expert then myself will chime in here....but...unless you plan on racing and "need" every last bit of power you can get I personally would just stick with the hydraulic. With more lift...it will be less tame for street driving and likely the torque and Hp rating are in a narrower rpm band than what you already have and may seem less powerfull until you get into that rpm range. My $.02 worth.
      David Beckstrom DVM

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Austin, Texas
      Posts
      17
      I agree that I will loss some drivablity... But it is hard to pass up on 50HP and 50 tq.

      I am leaning towards the hydrualic. I would love to have the extra power but I also don't want to worry about the valve train the whole time I am driving.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States
      The extra power sounds good, but where in the power curve does it come in? You want to look at area under the torque curve and decide how high you're going to rev this engine.

      When you consider the valvetrain stress due to lift, the extra valvetrain and bottom end stress because you'll need to raise the rpm to use that peak power, and the sacrifice in driveability, I doubt it's worth it for bragging rights. Unless of course this is mostly a strip or road course car than it is a street car.

      Oh, and let's not forget the TKO500 is rated to 500ft-lbs of torque. So the solid roller with more torque means more likely to damage the trans. Then let's talk about the rear. The 8.5" is strong from the factory, but will it hold up to that much torque or have you modified it to handle that much torque?

      Consider the package.
      Red Forman: "The Mustang's front end is problematic; get yourself a Firebird."

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Henderson,NV
      Posts
      2,870
      Country Flag: United States
      Since it's a roller cam, I don't feel the adjustments will be as frequent as a flat tappet cam. If it was a big block I would say undoubtly to do it. A mechanical cam allows steeper ramps and more reliable high rpm power. Before I make up my mind, I have a few questions.

      What is the intended purpose of the car?
      What rear end gear do you have or plan to have?
      What trans?

      Keep in mind that opening and closing pressures are normally higher on a mechanical and you more than likely should rework your valve springs.
      Todd

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Austin, Texas
      Posts
      17
      The porpose of the car will be to cruise it on the street and do some track events IE DE Road coarse events. A few trips to drag strip but not set up for drag. Way too stiff.

      The rear gear is 3.43

      Trans is TKO 500
      The power curve is very simial to the hydraulic cam every thing just moves up about 200-300 rpm.

      Peak power is at 6400 with solid

      Peak power is at 6200 with hydraulic

      From 3500 RPM on the solid just makes about 40-50 more everywhere.

      Its a tough call. It will require some more $ parts also.

      The prior motor made right at 500 hp and the drivtrain held up great.

      Just a tempting option.

      Travis

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Henderson,NV
      Posts
      2,870
      Country Flag: United States
      If you run many road races, I'd go mechanical. You can still keep some drivability if you choose the right cam. Call up comp or isky and see what they recommend for both.
      Todd

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Austin, Texas
      Posts
      17
      My only fear now is if I go with the Solid roller then I may have trouble shifting my TKO 500. As they look to be only good for about 6500 RPM shifting. I would be willing to send it off to be worked on if I could make it better. But not sure about the ability to shift at 7k plus...

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Henderson,NV
      Posts
      2,870
      Country Flag: United States
      You don't have to pick a cam for 7000rpm.
      Todd

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Maysville, KY
      Posts
      156
      Go with the solid roller and put a good stud girdle on it and enjoy the power. That's the problem now days, everyone wants the most hp but dont want to sacrifice and do an annual valve adjustment that takes maybe an hour to do. Come on guys its worth the extra power to do. Personally I check my valve adjustment ebout every 3 months anyway.
      Kevin Turner
      Maysville, KY

      3-69 Camaro's

      02 S10 extended cab that's street legal & runs 10's on motor and 9's with spray.

      04 GMC Denali Quadsteer truck black with black 22's.

      04 GTO LS1 that loves to be sprayed and meet imports on the street.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Jan 2008
      Location
      chattanooga tn
      Posts
      25
      yeah man go with the roller you will love the power band this cam has just get good girdles and u will b ok




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com