Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 8 of 8
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Posts
      10

      Z06 Wheel offset

      I'm curious why, the corvettes run so much positive Wheel offset? I'm building a 67 LSX 6 speed and working out the details of suspension choices.



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Location
      Olathe, KS
      Posts
      1,158
      Country Flag: United States
      One nice thing that comes with the high offset on the C5/C6 designs is that it results in significantly reduced scrub radius when used with the C5/C6 suspension.
      The offset allows you to run a longer lower control arm which reduces the angular change the suspension components go through as they move through their travel.

      There's nothing that will inherently make the car corner better with positive wheel offset. The wheels are designed around the suspension.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Posts
      10
      I have purchased the AME front clip with C6 components, so with this design will it handle better with the higher offset? Or do I really worry about wheel and tire fitment issues.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      Higher offset also puts less strain on the wheel bearings, spindles ect.

      It was something that should have been done a long time ago... but brakes and suspension componts would not fit.
      With the popularization of larger diameter wheels the componets can now fit inside of the wheels instead of behind them
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Manassas, VA
      Posts
      124
      Hm, I thought the more offset there is from zero, the more side load on the wheel bearings?

      I also was under the impression that the ideal location for the ball joint and wheel bearing is completely to the outside of the wheel? That would allow the longest arm on the control arms to be used, and a much more granular/linear arc due to the leverage?

      I picture a coil spring on the floor, against a wall, and you have 2 bars, a long one and a short one. There's a hole in the wall at 2/3 hieght of the spring. You stick the short bar in the hole, and push/pull down on the other end, slowly compressing the spring. The spring rate as it compresses, if you graph it, would be a sharp slope. Now do that with the long bar, and you can gradually apply pressure, and the spring graph will be a smoother arc. (If you add tire to the bar length, it's squirmy, and you loose control of the compression/spring rate. If you turn the wheel, you change the length.).

      And negative is towards the center of the car, right? Aren't we talking about negative and not positive? New 'vettes are positive?


      Thinking out loud, and certainly could be wrong....


      .
      HWYSTR455 on PY
      1971 Lemans Sport 461 bottle fed daily driver
      1971 Trans Am 474 blown EFI pro tour car
      1972 442 W-30 clone

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Location
      Olathe, KS
      Posts
      1,158
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by HWYSTR View Post
      I also was under the impression that the ideal location for the ball joint and wheel bearing is completely to the outside of the wheel? That would allow the longest arm on the control arms to be used, and a much more granular/linear arc due to the leverage?

      The vettes do use a high positive offset.

      Otherwise, As long as you're calling the wheel side furthest from the vehicle center line the "outside" we're speaking the same language.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jun 2005
      Location
      Manassas, VA
      Posts
      124
      Oh, had that backwards then! Ok, positive is towards the inside, got it! Thanks!

      .
      HWYSTR455 on PY
      1971 Lemans Sport 461 bottle fed daily driver
      1971 Trans Am 474 blown EFI pro tour car
      1972 442 W-30 clone

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Auburn, WA
      Posts
      1,359
      Quote Originally Posted by ezccole View Post
      I have purchased the AME front clip with C6 components, so with this design will it handle better with the higher offset? Or do I really worry about wheel and tire fitment issues.
      No, that suspension was desiged to run wheels and tires that would fit under a first-gen F-body.

      The geometry isn't stock Corvette, anyway.
      Matt Jones
      Mechanical Engineer
      Art Morrison Enterprises




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com