Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 38
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      Elizabethtown pa
      Posts
      92

      Narrowing a front suspension

      I installed a corvette C4 front suspension in my 71 dart and had to narrow it 4in so it would fit. Is this going to kill the geometry or will I be ok?


      Nate Kauffman

      "She sips nitro with phase 4 heads, 600 horsepower through the wheels, shes meanness set to music and the bitch was born to run." Mad Max


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Aug 2006
      Location
      San Francisco, CA
      Posts
      808
      Country Flag: United States
      Did you narrow it by moving the frame rails closer together?
      Steven

      1968 Camaro: Project "TRACKDAY"

      Latest Track Weekend Video

      Build in Progress

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      Elizabethtown pa
      Posts
      92
      Yes I made my own mounts and moved them in.
      Nate Kauffman

      "She sips nitro with phase 4 heads, 600 horsepower through the wheels, shes meanness set to music and the bitch was born to run." Mad Max

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Posts
      777
      Country Flag: United States

      Back from a nap...

      Related to the original post...

      If you narrowed the width of a C5 front suspension by moving the control arm mounts in 1" per side on the horizontal plane and also narrowed the tie rod ends by the same amount, would this affect bumpsteer or anything else?

      --JMarsa

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Mantorville, MN
      Posts
      835
      Country Flag: United States
      In order to keep the steering geometry, you'd need to take out of the middle (the rack).
      Derek Kiefer,
      Mantorville, MN

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Posts
      777
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Derek69SS View Post
      In order to keep the steering geometry, you'd need to take out of the middle (the rack).

      I believe you, I just don't understand why.

      --JMarsa

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Mar 2003
      Location
      Fallston, MD
      Posts
      564
      If you keep the svsa the same the rc will migrate most likely up
      Brian Schein

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Posts
      777
      Country Flag: United States
      OK so help me out here. SVSA = Side View Swing Arm



      I went and did some more research and I also printed out the diagram below and narrowed the track width 1" per side and compared the two. I also ran them through Perf Trends Analyzer and came to the same conclusion. Here's the math for the changes:

      Std/-1"
      Scrub Radius = .36/-.64
      Roll Center Height = 2.92/2.83
      Roll Stiffness ft-lbs/deg = 1957/1849
      Anti Dive = 53.9/54.4
      FVSAL = 320.6/319.6
      SVSAL = 68.8/68.6

      Anything to worry about other than the scrub?

      --JMarsa

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Nov 2008
      Location
      st. paul mn.
      Posts
      438
      4" thats alot.you are definately going to have some serious bump steer.if you use a center stear rack it will be just fine.the corvette rack will not work.the pivot point on the inner tie rod socket is were you need to work from.you can't narrow the rack up because you won't have enough travel.flaming river,unisteer should be able to hook you up. you would be better off using a different offset wheel.and not narrowing it so much. keep the hot rod dream alive

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Posts
      777
      Country Flag: United States
      I meant 2" overall, 1" per side.

      Where's Norm when you need him

      --JMarsa

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by JMarsa
      Anything to worry about other than the scrub?
      Yes. 1. How does your roll center move at 4* roll? (before/after) 2. How is bumpsteer affected?

      jp
      John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Mar 2003
      Location
      Fallston, MD
      Posts
      564
      sorry meant to say front view swing arm but you started researching the right stuff
      Brian Schein

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Posts
      777
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by parsonsj View Post
      Yes. 1. How does your roll center move at 4* roll? (before/after) 2. How is bumpsteer affected?

      jp
      I think I need some more training with the software. (I'm using the demo version right now). I changed roll to 4 but the roll center height stayed the same as the previous values.

      Is the way to view bumpsteer (toe in gain) only in the graphs?

      --JMarsa

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Nov 2002
      Location
      state of confusion
      Posts
      1,499
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote:
      Originally Posted by Derek69SS
      In order to keep the steering geometry, you'd need to take out of the middle (the rack).


      Quote Originally Posted by JMarsa View Post
      I believe you, I just don't understand why.

      --JMarsa
      When you shorten the tierods you've changed the relationship of two steering pivots relative to the rest and tightened up the arc that the outer tierods and steering arms must follow. The result is bumpsteer that wasn't there before and which probably cannot be compensated for as well as the original either was or could be no matter what you try. The relationship among all the other pivot points was left alone, so things like camber gain remain as they were.

      If you remove width from between the inner tierod pivots, then you've left the relationship between those points and all the others intact and nothing at all has changed geometrically. Finding a rack that does precisely this seems to be the "problem".


      Norm
      '08 GT coupe, 5M, suspension unstockish (the occasional track toy)
      '19 WRX, Turbo-H4/6M (the family sedan . . . seriously)
      Gone but not forgotten dep't:
      '01 Maxima 20AE 5M, '10 LGT 6M, '95 626, V6/5M; '79 Malibu, V8/4M-5M; '87 Maxima, V6/5M; '72 Pinto, I4/4M; '64 Dodge V8/3A

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Posts
      777
      Country Flag: United States
      OK I think I get it. Thanks Norm.

      So why is a narrowed rack a problem? There's a few custom rack manufactures out there. Sounds like a rack with the same specs as stock that's shorted by the same amount that the track width is.

      --JMarsa

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by JMarsa
      why is a narrowed rack a problem?
      It's expensive, with long lead times. Not a show-stopper, but still a problem.

      Keep us posted as you finalize this. I'd still like to know how your dynamic roll center is affected. 4* roll will move your roll center by at least an inch, and sometimes as much as 10 inches.

      jp
      John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Nov 2002
      Location
      state of confusion
      Posts
      1,499
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by parsonsj View Post
      4* roll will move your roll center by at least an inch, and sometimes as much as 10 inches.

      jp
      Sounds like somebody else has looked at the "McBearen" rear suspension . . .


      Norm
      '08 GT coupe, 5M, suspension unstockish (the occasional track toy)
      '19 WRX, Turbo-H4/6M (the family sedan . . . seriously)
      Gone but not forgotten dep't:
      '01 Maxima 20AE 5M, '10 LGT 6M, '95 626, V6/5M; '79 Malibu, V8/4M-5M; '87 Maxima, V6/5M; '72 Pinto, I4/4M; '64 Dodge V8/3A

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Nov 2007
      Location
      Vancouver, WA
      Posts
      315
      Quote Originally Posted by parsonsj View Post
      It's expensive
      Exactly! Woodward makes high quality products none the less!

      Pardon the green tape...


      1970 Dodge "E-Tikit" Challenger


    19. #19
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      Since we're comparing sizes... (without green tape):



      More here.

      jp
      John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Posts
      777
      Country Flag: United States
      I really don't see how that's considered expensive part of the build.
      You can't drive without it! Compared to some wheels, hood hinges and other extraneous bits I'd gladly spend $800 on a rack.

      JP - I'll run the numbers tonight to get at how dynamic roll center is affected. BTW, who made your rack?


      --JMarsa

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com