Results 1 to 17 of 17
-
06-12-2008 #1
First Gen F Body Subframe... Another angle
HI. Couple of things up front.
I am frugal not rich, some might even say cheap. However will spend the $$ on things that work. I have a bent OE subframe.
So here it goes.
My plan in to put the car on the road with the Gen 1 SBC and then the following winter switch to a LS series SB.
They way I look @ it to replace the Subframe with anoter stock one,
400 to 500 just for the bare sub another 200 to 500 T&M to clean reweld and coat/paint. By the time I get all of the pieces needeed to run the LS engine its going to start to add up.
I have been watching various subframes and read many posts about them. The conclusion I have drawn is that thier are a few that are great. In terms of performance you can pretty much get a stock subframe to work just as well. For me the real advantage comes in the reported fitmit of the LS engines and the Racks & pinions.
Hopefully I have layed this out clearly. MY question is since I have to replace my sub and I found the speedtech sub for 2K bare. Which way would you go? Buy another OE or the speed tech one?
-
06-12-2008 #2I think you maybe able to pick up a stock subframe for less then 400.00 if you keep and eye out. The real question in my eyes is how much of the work you will do your self on preping the frame. If you are going to hire all the work done I would bet the aftermarket frame would be the best deal in the long run. If you can do all the welding, fabricating and painting on the factory frame that would be the most cost effective.

1968 Firebird. Owed and operated since 1981. 455 5 speed 4 link mini-tubed ect.....
06-12-2008 #3I'd be careful about that. While many characteristics can come fairly close to a good aftermarket frame, don't forget the stock setup is still rear steer and a bit overweight. Aftermarket frames help to allow pretty darn close to a 50/50 weight distribution.
Originally Posted by XLexusTech
As I've said before, it all comes down to whether the price is worth it. That's up to you of course!Last edited by silver69camaro; 06-12-2008 at 04:20 AM.
Matt Jones
Mechanical Engineer
Art Morrison Enterprises
06-12-2008 #4Hi thankss for your response.
Originally Posted by silver69camaro
My plans for ths stock SUB included the ATS tall spindles I think that would take care of the Geometry/ Do you disagree?
What kind of weight advantage are we taling about?
Can yo provide detials on that? E.G Stock weighs xxx .lbs and DSE weighs ??? or speed tech wehighs ??? CA weighs???
Since unsprug weight is were allot of gains can be made I had planned on the ATS componants and aftermarket arms. The Rack will shave a few lbs.
I relise this is a subjective discussion I appreaciate your thoughts.
To me ita about maksing the best $$l decision while balancing performace. I dont want to be one of those folk who spent $$ on parts and turn out to spend just as much if not more then they would on an aftermarket package.
06-12-2008 #5I understand the position of trying to balance performance and $$. Been there done that, still do it.
Anyway, I can't comment of the weight of other subframes, but I can say that ours can shave 30-40lbs off from stock frame (with power steering). Remember that's all weight right over the front axle too.
As far as geometry goes, specifically rear steer, there isn't anything you can do about it. It's about bushing deflection, and rear steer vehicles will add more steering as bushings deflect under load. Stiffer bushings will help, but it's still there.Matt Jones
Mechanical Engineer
Art Morrison Enterprises
06-12-2008 #6



Reply With Quote