Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 41
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States

      Russell braided SS fuel line failure

      After my main fuel hose failed last weekend, I've been slowly getting the parts together to re-engineer my fuel delivery setup. I pulled all the Russell SS hose off my car since I'm converting it all to hard line, except a short hose to allow for engine movement where required. Most of the car was already using hard line, but I got a bit lazy at the end of the build and used about 3 feet of hose in the pressure side and 4 feet on the return side.



      Anyway, tonight I pulled the hose ends off of one short hose (from the fuel rail, so it saw 42 psi), and cut the hose apart.

      Check it out: what an unbelievable garbage piece of hose!! This hose has been in service for just over 2 years, and has less than 2000 miles. Russell really has some explaining to do.

      jp
      Attached Images Attached Images  
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Newbury Park, CA
      Posts
      5,838
      Country Flag: United States
      That's ugly.
      VaporWorx. We Give You Gas http://www.vaporworx.com

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Sep 2005
      Location
      So Cal
      Posts
      237
      Thats so wrong for a company to put out a product like that!

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      Kettering, OH
      Posts
      537
      CR@P! That's what I'm running although just a few short sections here and there. Still, it only takes one to fail and burn the car down. How you discover the first failure?
      1967 Firebird Convert, Fuel Injected 462 ci, TKO 600
      http://1967firebird.atwebpages.com

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      How [did] you discover the first failure?
      I noticed that my fuel level was going down at an alarming rate. When I got home I had a big puddle of gasoline all over the floor. It was pretty hard to miss... the scariest part was that the gas was dripping on the headers.

      jp
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Location
      NW burbs IL
      Posts
      1,732
      Thanks for the info John, it seems like its always something.
      Matt


      Current project: " Chain Reaction "

      A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.

      1969 RS Camaro L92 T56 Quadra-link, CW sub, Ford 9" a progressive build.

      Ex track car: 1995 Camaro LS1 T56

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      And btw, I've received no response from Edelbrock (Russell's parent company):

      I'm writing to alert you about a problem with your Russell brand SS ProFlex hose. I've been using it in my fuel-injected 67 Nova for the past two years. I had about 30 inches of hose feeding my main fuel rails, and another 8-10 inches in the fuel rails themselves. I run my setup with 42 psi.

      Last week, my main fuel hose failed, with fuel gushing out. This is after barely 1300 miles of road use, spread over the past two years. I removed all the Russell hose, and cut one of the sections in the fuel rail apart (this was not the failure, but a lot easier to cut up). I've included a photo of it. It has several cracks, and one large crack that would have failed at any time. I found the same cracks in all the main fuel line hose. It seems to me that the hose is incompatible with pump gas, but I would very much appreciate your take on the matter.

      Regards,

      John Parsons
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      294
      Country Flag: United States
      Just curious what you are going to replace it with. I also have two flex lines approx 24" long going to my fuel rail. Three years old, 45 psi...
      I think I should replace them.
      Tg

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      Nacogdoches, TX
      Posts
      70
      John,

      I am a consumer of this product as well and am very interested in figuring out the cause of this failure. I am curious as to how this piece of hose was configured in your fuel system. Looking at the discoloration of the hose, it looks like there were two fittings placed close together in the system. The piece of hose that the fitting attaches to and some hose thereafter should be under higher stress to create the seal at the hose end. Having two fittings close together could cause a highly stressed section of hose that also (if I understood you correctly) is the main piece absorbing the movement of the engine in relation to the chassis.

      If your system is configured this way...I am not saying that two fittings so close together caused the failure, but I would like to hear your thoughts and input about this. Maybe some pics of a longer length of hose not located around fittings would shed light on the possible causes of this failure.

      Shaun
      Mast Motorsports
      High Performance Powertrain Solutions
      [email protected]
      www.mastmotorsports.com

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      Hi Shaun,

      Good question! That photo is of a section of hose from between the fuel rails. It had no movement as both ends were attached to a rail. I included it in the thread because it was convenient to cut apart and photograph.

      Here's a pic of the section of failed hose that was between the fuel rail and chassis. As you can see, the failure mode is the same. One more thing I'd add: the hose feels hard and crusty. As if it were very old. Cutting it is more like whittling wood than cutting rubber.

      jp
      Attached Images Attached Images  
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by Fuelie Nova
      Just curious what you are going to replace it with.
      I'm going to replace the hose with hard line, plus a short 12" section of PTFE-lined hose from Brown and Miller.

      jp
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      Nacogdoches, TX
      Posts
      70
      Quote Originally Posted by parsonsj
      Hi Shaun,

      Good question! That photo is of a section of hose from between the fuel rails. It had no movement as both ends were attached to a rail. I included it in the thread because it was convenient to cut apart and photograph.

      Here's a pic of the section of failed hose that was between the fuel rail and chassis. As you can see, the failure mode is the same. One more thing I'd add: the hose feels hard and crusty. As if it were very old. Cutting it is more like whittling wood than cutting rubber.

      jp
      Thanks John! That is exactly what I was hoping you would post up. This picture shows alot of information in analyzing this failure. I do have one question...what kind of fuel does your engine run? I would like to get to the bottom of this issue.

      Thanks,

      Shaun
      Mast Motorsports
      High Performance Powertrain Solutions
      [email protected]
      www.mastmotorsports.com

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Mountain View, CA
      Posts
      9,583
      Country Flag: United States
      Dang!

      Any response from Vic's boys? I wish you'd have said something sooner. I spent about 30min speaking with Vic last week at the Wine Country Classic.
      True T.

      Whats new with Project 1/2-Trak?


      Follow my wisecracks on Sports, Food, Politics and other BS on Twitter.

      My blog

      When they kick out your front door, How you gonna come?
      With your hands on your head, Or on the trigger of your gun?

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Location
      Henderson,NV
      Posts
      2,870
      Country Flag: United States
      That is a really dangerous situation for many on the road right now if it's not related to your application. I am also interested in the type of fuel you run? I have been using Jegs AN fittings and hose. I hope Russell doesn't make it too.
      Todd

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Phoenix, AZ
      Posts
      826
      Yeah, Jegs stuff here too. Wonder who makes it, hope its not the same...
      Jeff K.
      69 Camaro SS, 406 SBC, TKO600, 9" w/3.73 tru-trac, Speedtech Arms, AFX Spindles, Lee 670 Box, Baer GT front, C5Z rear. Hyperco Leafs w/ Fays2 Watts Link + Varishocks.

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States
      I run pump gas. 93 octane from the station on the corner.

      And yes, I think this is a dangerous situation.

      And no, I've not heard back from Edelbrock.

      jp
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Posts
      294
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm going to replace the hose with hard line, plus a short 12" section of PTFE-lined hose from Brown and Miller.
      I just emailed them to get info. I have a fuel injected Nova using the same hose you had. Driving it from Minneapolis to Gettyburg next month... don't need a fuel line failure.
      Tg

    18. #18
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Boulder, Colorado
      Posts
      192
      I've got Earl's (non-braided) line from the pump near the tank to the rails. Should I be concerned as well? Is it all the funky stuff in gas these days that causes problems? I'm gonna go check and see if it feels hardened like Parsons described.
      Eric

      69 Camaro - LT1 w/ 700R4, DSE springs, swaybar and Konis. Still rockin' it old school with 15" wheels and 60 series tires.

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Sep 2004
      Location
      Kettering, OH
      Posts
      537
      There's a lot of info out there on low sulfur fuel causing rubber parts failures, but most of it is with diesel.
      1967 Firebird Convert, Fuel Injected 462 ci, TKO 600
      http://1967firebird.atwebpages.com

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Jun 2001
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      10,604
      Country Flag: United States

      Edelbrock responds

      From Edelbrock:

      John,
      This hose is compatible with pump gas. The normal life expectancy of this hose is from 4 to 6 years, with normal use, not sitting dry for extended periods of time. The worst thing for this hose is to sit dry after fuel has been ran thru it. If you have a receipt we may be able to assist you with this situation.


      So, Edelbrock says to keep the hose immersed in fuel, and it will last longer. Maybe use checkballs or something to keep fuel pressure in the rails?

      jp
      ​John Parsons

      UnRivaled Rides -- Modern upgrades for your ride.

      UnRivaled Rides recent project -- LS9-powered 69 Camaro

    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com