Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 6 of 6

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      Greeley, Colorado
      Posts
      485

      SC&C: AFX vs Stage 2+

      I'm at the point where I need to get suspension pieces on order, however I'm going back and forth on SC&C's AFX upgrade using the tall spindles, or going with the Stage 2+ utilizing the factory spindles and the tall ball-joints.

      Now, under normal circumstances, given the minimal cost increase, I would obviously go for the AFX spindles.

      However, my issue is that I already have discs on the front of the car utilizing the factory style spindle.

      If I go with the AFX spindle I will have to purchase a new front brake kit.

      Granted, the front end disc kit I have installed is just a simple Master Power Brakes kit, so upgrading would be decent.

      Given the cost involved however, in your mind is the AFX spindle that much better than the Stage 2+ which would end up being quite a bit cheaper not having to purchase new brakes for the front.



      Car will primarily be used on the street, but will see a couple HPDE, and auto-x events per year.
      Jason Mounce
      1969 Firebird | 2008 Corvette Z06 | 2008 Mustang GT/CS


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Sep 2001
      Location
      Accord, NY
      Posts
      2,295
      Country Flag: United States
      I'm in a similiar position except I have the taller UBJ's and SC&C UCA's. Since my car is a street car 9x% I'm very happy with the results so far. Now if/when there's ABS to go along with the AFX setup...hmmm.
      69 Camaro convertible, 410, M22, 8-pt cage therapy program. SOLD.
      68 camaro - SOLD
      67 Bel Air - New street project with perfect floors, frame and trunk!

    3. #3
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      I believe that Marcus has stated that the AFX setup beats the taller balljoint setup. I would call him since he is a straight shooter and will lead you down the right path.

      If it were me, AFX. Also, have you bought rims? AFX spindles narrow the track width slightly (~1/4" per side) so that is something else to cosider.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Dec 2004
      Location
      Greeley, Colorado
      Posts
      485
      Quote Originally Posted by 6'9"Witha69
      I believe that Marcus has stated that the AFX setup beats the taller balljoint setup. I would call him since he is a straight shooter and will lead you down the right path.

      If it were me, AFX. Also, have you bought rims? AFX spindles narrow the track width slightly (~1/4" per side) so that is something else to cosider.
      No, I have not purchased wheels yet. New rear-end and discs out back will change things slightly as well. So I need to get all this stuff in the car before I can take measurements for wheels.

      I'll give SC&C a call today. Thanks.
      Jason Mounce
      1969 Firebird | 2008 Corvette Z06 | 2008 Mustang GT/CS

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Dec 2002
      Location
      Lost Wages, Nevada
      Posts
      2,684
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by 6'9"Witha69
      If it were me, AFX. Also, have you bought rims? AFX spindles narrow the track width slightly (~1/4" per side) so that is something else to cosider.
      ...Which offsets the hat thickness of the late model brake systems. Gross numbers show you a TW change by 1/4"... but the hat thickness on a few aftermarket systems is nearing 1/2". So you actually gain 1/4" per side in TW...

    6. #6
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by chicane67
      ...Which offsets the hat thickness of the late model brake systems. Gross numbers show you a TW change by 1/4"... but the hat thickness on a few aftermarket systems is nearing 1/2". So you actually gain 1/4" per side in TW...
      Correct, forgot about that especially for Wilwood and similar that use aluminum hats for 2 pc rotor setups. Those are .375" or greater in a lot of cases.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com