Results 1 to 20 of 38
-
03-16-2008 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 156
Could someone explain returnless systems?
I put an aftermarket efi system on my 72 pontiac 400 with an external fuel pump; the pump that came with the kit. i drove it today on the highway for about half an hour before i hit unexpected traffic. i slowed the car down and the car bogged and shut off. i am running one vent line from the tank to above the tank to outside air.
i'm starting to hear that returnless systems are not as reliable as return systems, but i know some ls engine cars have returnless systems. has anyone had experience with them? would running a return line make that much of a difference even if i'm properly vented? why make returnless systems at all if they're in fact unreliable? i planned on having my ls1 powered car a returnless system but now i'm not so sure.
my instruction manual says: "This system is the FIRST! of its
kind to control fuel pressure electronically and allow the
use of a single fuel line while maintaining constant fuel
pressure. This system should only be used in applications
under 500hp." OK, so is it changing the voltage of the fuel pump or something??
a buddy of mine said that my external fuel pump on my 72 firebid's system could very well be overheating; that at cruise i should be fine but sitting in traffic some of them are known to overheat. anyone else have this issue? do you recommend any external fuel pumps for daily drivers with an aftermarket efi system?
i know that's a lot of questions but it was totally embarassing pulling over on the side of the road over and over yesterday. if i let the car sit for 15-20 minutes, it started up fine and drove perfectly for about 10 minutes, and then it would just shut off. wait again, drives fine for 10 mins, then dies, wait again, etc.
thanks for any help/advice guys
-
03-16-2008 #2The factory returnless systems use a return line from the pump/reg at the tank and not at the fuel rails. you still need to return un-used fuel to the tank or the pump will overheat as it dead heading against the injectors in low demand situations, but the pump is still trying to move fuel. Where is your reg. located? you should be able to run a return line from there to the tank.
Mark
LS1- T56
under construction
"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
03-16-2008 #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 156
thanks for the reply, 70. if that's the case why aren't all systems return style?
this systems says that the fuel pressure controls the fuel electronically. so it sounds to me like a return line is used for excess fuel (like you said) but they claim that this system has no need to compensate for excess fuel.
i messed with the car today and it idled fine for half an hour in the driveway. i revved it a little, was fine. i revved it a lot, it was fine. but check this out. my throttle linkage has a little slop in it. like when you press on the accelerator you will feel it "stop" just a little bit, before you press the accelerator down further. ok when i revved it at that stopping point, the car would want to shut down. i stuck a piece of wire in there loosely to get rid of the slop, and the car seemed fine, no problems. but the wire was set in there loosely, so when i revved the engine and it came back down to idle, the slop came back and the engine bogged again.
i've attached a pic but it's kind of a bad pic. it's hard to explain what i'm talking about if you haven't experienced it.
03-16-2008 #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Kettering, OH
- Posts
- 537
Zig,
Some of the OEM systems return back by the tank, keeping excess fuel from being routed up over the engine. I had fuel heating problems last summer and insultated my lines and put a controller in to slow the pump down when the engine is spinning under 3k rpm.
I would guess that your controller is a pulse width modulated type. pwm controllers turn the pump on and off many times a minute and control the amount of on/off time to effectively slow it down. I can hear the SCRs in my PWM controller buzzing until it warms up.
The slop that you are noting looks like it is at the secondary throttle plates. Is that right? Maybe you've got a problem with your secondaries not closing properly and that's throwing off the IAC?1967 Firebird Convert, Fuel Injected 462 ci, TKO 600
http://1967firebird.atwebpages.com
03-16-2008 #5I'm still pretty new to EFI so I'm learning here too.
Sounds like your system includes a pump controller to compensate for low demand. Maybe it is not wired/operating properly. I belive the controller drops voltage to the pump at low RPM.
You could check voltage to the pump at different rpm/load to see if the voltage varies. If not, it isn't working properly.
I belive having a return line from the rails back to the tank is best as it prevents feeding heated fuel to the injectors.
Hopefuly one of the EFI gurus here will chime in and set us both straight.Mark
LS1- T56
under construction
"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
03-18-2008 #6
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 156
Hey guys, talked to Retrotek yesterday. They said they send out the systems with the linkages because it helps setting idle for some people. They said that the reason why it's shutting off when i come off idle and hit the slop is because the secondaries are not opening at the same time the primaries are off idle. So John, you were close!
On my Retrotekspeed efi system, both the primaries and the secondaries need to open and close at the same time. Otherwise the engine can be starved or the opposite, flooded.
someone mentioned that a grommet would eliminate the slop. do you guys know of any other creative ways to get rid of it? i was thinking about using epoxy but that will look pretty ghetto...
03-18-2008 #7



Reply With Quote