Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 11 of 11
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Location
      Arlington Heights, IL
      Posts
      792

      Backspace question for narrowed rear end.

      My 68 camaro is mini tubbed. I will be getting 17x11 wheels for the rear. Im going to narrow the rear end. Whats the typical backspacing people go with when doing this? Should I narrow the rear end first then get the wheels to fit? Or get the wheels in the backspacing I want and then get the rear end narrowed? I want the biggest outer lip possible.

      Thanks
      Jesse

      1969 Camaro under construction.
      1967 firebird. 6.0/t56. Ridetech stage 2. Moser 9 inch. Forgeline wheels.(SOLD)


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jun 2007
      Location
      Huntington Beach, CA
      Posts
      624
      I think you need to narrow the rear end first. Order up new axles. Then measure the back spacing for the rims.
      Rick
      -----------------------------
      " Better to Be Lucky than Good "

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Cincinnati Ohio
      Posts
      1,060
      Country Flag: United States
      When i do custom wheels and narrowed rears, i get the wheels first and then do the rear.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Location
      Laredo, TX
      Posts
      66
      I just got a narrowed g-bar ready rear from Frank. Then I ordered the wheels from him. That would be my suggestion for a perfect fit!

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      Jessie, there is a bit more to the math. What suspension are you running? What wheels? What tires?

      A good start is a 55' rear and a 5.5" backspace on a 11" wheel. If you want more lip, lower the backspace and narrow the rear that much more, but around 54" width you start to have a problem with Leaf spring perches sitting on the bearing housing.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Location
      Arlington Heights, IL
      Posts
      792
      The rear suspension set up is mini tubbed, dse leaf springs and shock brackets. 17x11 ccw wheel with a 315/35/17. I was guessing somewhere around 5.5 backspace. Should i get the wheels in that backspace then?
      1969 Camaro under construction.
      1967 firebird. 6.0/t56. Ridetech stage 2. Moser 9 inch. Forgeline wheels.(SOLD)

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      Yes sir

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Mar 2005
      Location
      Sterling Heights
      Posts
      91
      Ok, I think I see my difference. Is he using drum or disk brakes?
      My calculations (69Camaro) including any brake material were:
      54" mounting to mounting surface - rear axle
      4 1/2" B.S. on 11" rim
      Looking at about a 12 1/2" wide tire (don't know tread width)
      with 3/4" gap on either side of the 14" wide wheel well.

      I seem to be 3/8" wider per side, is that partially due to 1/4 inch per
      side cause of disk brakes or am I really off. I measured twice
      already and wanted to go with a deeper look on the wheels.
      I guess I'll measure again, but all cars are different, could they
      really be 3/8 different per side (3/4 total)?

    9. #9
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      Sure, a bit more than that as far as 68 compared to a 69. Always measure the actual car to be absolutly sure.
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Posts
      57
      i went with a 17x 11 tt2 5 inch back spacing

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Aug 2007
      Posts
      57
      i went with a 97 mustang cobra 8.8 rear end narrowed it 4 inches on each side with the 5 inch backspacing on a 68 camaro im going to put it up for sale so check out the forsale section later mabey youll like the way they tuck




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com