Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 8 of 8
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Welland, Canada
      Posts
      197

      Gmod with Speedtech UCA

      What are the ideal measurements for the Gmod and ST uca's?

      Does cutting 3/4in off the mount and moving it back 1/2in sound about right?

      Dean

      69 Camaro 355-3.73 Moser Truetrac-TKO600-Hotchkis-DSE-QA1's-Baer's-17"Budnik's
      ST U/LCA's-GW Del-a-lum's-Lee p/s


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      Central CA USA
      Posts
      6,114
      Country Flag: United States
      My measurements off my template are lower ft bolt 1.060" lower rear bolt .775" measure from the existing holes downward. My template was acquired by me when I visited Guldstrand sometime around 1973, I talked to an engineer there who said they developed this template for Penske. My version shows some alternate holes that were tried, these holes were higher and lower than this "final" version.

      NOTE Chicane67 was an employee of Guldstrand Ent and says his hole lowering measurements are: F .875" R .775" This version seems to be removing a bit less anti-dive than mine. This may be a later template.

      My web page has the template if you want to drill the holes.
      I moved my whole bracket to the rear 1/2" and with Speed Tech upper arms have approx 4 deg caster with no shims.
      David
      Last edited by David Pozzi; 01-01-2008 at 09:25 PM.
      67 Camaro RS that will be faster than anything Mary owns.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Oct 2003
      Location
      Arvada, Co
      Posts
      2,119
      Country Flag: United States
      I would just lower the mounting holes if you are using aftermarket UCAs. That way you get better FVSA geometry of the Guldstrand mod without having too much positive caster.
      Brian


      I have an unlimited budget. That bad part is I have already used it up.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Welland, Canada
      Posts
      197
      Yeah I think I'll drill new holes instead, seems easier.

      Would I need an alignment if the holes were just lowered and/or moved back a bit?
      Dean

      69 Camaro 355-3.73 Moser Truetrac-TKO600-Hotchkis-DSE-QA1's-Baer's-17"Budnik's
      ST U/LCA's-GW Del-a-lum's-Lee p/s

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Oct 2003
      Location
      Arvada, Co
      Posts
      2,119
      Country Flag: United States
      Yes you will need to realign the car.
      Brian


      I have an unlimited budget. That bad part is I have already used it up.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Welland, Canada
      Posts
      197
      What if I went with the Howe tall joints, would I need an alignment?

      Thanks
      Dean

      69 Camaro 355-3.73 Moser Truetrac-TKO600-Hotchkis-DSE-QA1's-Baer's-17"Budnik's
      ST U/LCA's-GW Del-a-lum's-Lee p/s

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Patterson, NY
      Posts
      784
      No matter what you do, once you unbolt anything in the front end you should get it aligned.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Oct 2003
      Location
      Arvada, Co
      Posts
      2,119
      Country Flag: United States
      Quote Originally Posted by GetMore
      No matter what you do, once you unbolt anything in the front end you should get it aligned.
      You are correct. You cannot get away from it.
      Brian


      I have an unlimited budget. That bad part is I have already used it up.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com