Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 14 of 14
    1. #1
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Vallejo, California
      Posts
      273
      Country Flag: United States

      Chevy roller motors

      What year did chevy start using roller 350s in their cars and trucks? I am trying to price out Factory roller VS. Retro-fit roller. Thanks.

      Alex Johnson

      '69 Nova 350/TH350
      '63 Nova 305/TH350 (The wife's project)

      '76 Suburban 1/2 ton 454/th400 2wd (SOLD)
      '74 C10 Fleetside 350/TH350 (SOLD)
      '72 Buick Skylark 350/th350 (SOLD)


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Eastern Virginia
      Posts
      3,965
      Country Flag: United States
      1987 GM started using factory roller cams in small blocks.
      1987 GM started with the center bolt head valve covers
      1986 GM started using the one piece rear seal crank seal
      Scot
      86 Monte SS


    3. #3
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Vallejo, California
      Posts
      273
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks. Is there a way to identify a roller motor without removing the intake?
      Alex Johnson

      '69 Nova 350/TH350
      '63 Nova 305/TH350 (The wife's project)

      '76 Suburban 1/2 ton 454/th400 2wd (SOLD)
      '74 C10 Fleetside 350/TH350 (SOLD)
      '72 Buick Skylark 350/th350 (SOLD)

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      I suppose you could pull the valve covers and use a dentists mirror... you can't really trust external inspection as lots of later truck motors still got flat tappet cams
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Eastern Virginia
      Posts
      3,965
      Country Flag: United States
      Like Lowend said, you will have to take something apart. Take the valve cover off & look down the oil drain hole, around the push rod hole & see if you can see one of the anti-rotation brackets around the lifter. If you can see that, then that would tell you it is roller cam. Or if you can see the "spider" that holds the retainers around the lifters.

      Scot
      86 Monte SS


    6. #6
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Vallejo, California
      Posts
      273
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks guys. Now is one (as in factory or retrofit) better than the other? Pros and Cons? I know the retrofit will end up costing about $1000 after the lifters and such. So I would say cost is a pro for the factory set-up. Anything else that should be known about either type?
      Alex Johnson

      '69 Nova 350/TH350
      '63 Nova 305/TH350 (The wife's project)

      '76 Suburban 1/2 ton 454/th400 2wd (SOLD)
      '74 C10 Fleetside 350/TH350 (SOLD)
      '72 Buick Skylark 350/th350 (SOLD)

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Flo-rida
      Posts
      1,204
      Ones just as good as the other i think, They did a retro-fit engine build in a magazine awhile back to show that if you dont have a roller block, you can still get the same hp.

      1993 Camaro Z28
      2001 Camaro Z28
      1969 Camaro


    8. #8
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Hamilton, NJ
      Posts
      4,319
      Country Flag: United States
      Using a factory roller, you might still have some costs associated with changing to 1-piece main blocks. Things that are possible off the top of my head may be new flywheel/flexplate, intake, balancer, valve covers. Depends on what you are starting with/have to work with.
      Scott from NJ.

      Vent Windows Forever! ...

      Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold
      I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      The 87-newer blocks are all 2-bolt mains if I recall...
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Flo-rida
      Posts
      1,204
      Quote Originally Posted by Lowend
      The 87-newer blocks are all 2-bolt mains if I recall...
      if thats the case then my 4-bolt roller block is rare. Not sure what year it is but its got a roller cam provisions (spider attatchment) and 4-bolt main, 1-piece rear seal.

      1993 Camaro Z28
      2001 Camaro Z28
      1969 Camaro


    11. #11
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Eastern Virginia
      Posts
      3,965
      Country Flag: United States
      I am not sure that the 87 & newer are all 2 bolt motors. I think the truck motors got 4 bolt mains. Again I am not 100% sure. I do know the Vette LT1 motors from 93 on were 4 bolt.
      Scot
      86 Monte SS


    12. #12
      Join Date
      Nov 2004
      Location
      Katy, TX
      Posts
      73
      Country Flag: United States
      In the trucks you didn't see the roller blocks until the vortec years. The camaros/vettes went to roller in 87.
      Most 3/4 ton and all 1 ton trucks got a 4 bolt block and steel cranks in this same time frame.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Jul 2005
      Location
      Eastern Virginia
      Posts
      3,965
      Country Flag: United States
      Weren't the truck blocks machined for the roller cams, but still got flat tappets?
      Scot
      86 Monte SS


    14. #14
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Flo-rida
      Posts
      1,204
      My 94 GMC has a roller cam in it.

      1993 Camaro Z28
      2001 Camaro Z28
      1969 Camaro





    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com