Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
    Results 1 to 20 of 22
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Mar 2007
      Location
      Denton, Texas
      Posts
      661

      2008 Dodge Challenger

      Dodge put up the official Challenger page
      http://www.dodge.com/en/challenger/

      & here is the official countdown to the release date
      http://www.dodgechallengercountdown.com/

      ~Chris
      1973 Mustang SportsRoof
      1985 Camaro Z28 Totaled, 1985 Camaro Berlinetta SOLD, 1989 Camaro RS SOLD, 1985 Corvette SOLD, 1969 Camaro Pro-Street SOLD, 1955 Chevy PU 1st Series SOLD


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Brampton, Ontario, CANADA !!
      Posts
      347
      I live about 15 minutes from the assembly plant where those will be put together. I usually see Magnums, Chargers, and 300s out for road-tests ... hope to see some Challengers soon as well!!


      cheers
      Ed N.
      Ed Nicholson
      73 VW Super Beetle "Sports Bug"
      95 Taurus SHO 5-speed -- new open-track beater

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Location
      Phx, Az
      Posts
      924
      LOL.. I saved the link to the countdown ..now when customers ask i will just show them that.
      1973 C10,400sbc, Baer Brakes, 4 link,TOYO tires
      2010 Charger RT
      __________________
      Joe

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Fort Worth, Tx
      Posts
      581
      Country Flag: United States
      Interested to see what the production model will look like along with the SRT-8 and custom versions.

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Jun 2007
      Location
      San Ramon, CA
      Posts
      77
      Man... it'd be awesome to have that car and the new camaro sitting in my garage! If only i had money =(
      Ralph
      '71 Chevy Camaro Z28 ~ '58 Chevy Fleetside ~ 98 Honda Civic LX (Daily Driver)
      R.I.P. '00 S-10 Xtreme ~ R.I.P. '00 bagged Sonoma

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Jul 2001
      Location
      Detroit, Michigan
      Posts
      6,854
      Country Flag: United States
      My cousin Lynn has been up there for the past 7 months setting up the plant to build those things. His company programs the robots and designs the assembly tracks. He says they look great but they're heavy vehicles. Close to 4 bills on the scale.
      1968 Pro-Touring Camaro LS1

      Project: Next Year
      - Start date; June '01
      - Completion; Sometime next year or the year after.....

    7. #7
      Join Date
      May 2002
      Location
      Northern California
      Posts
      10,716
      Country Flag: United States
      I hope its not a bomb like the PT cruiser and Prowler...I think I'd buy an 07 Boss 302 before that thing......I hear thunder...
      MrQuick ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε


    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Flo-rida
      Posts
      1,204
      I think the weight will be the only downside to the car, its basically a 2 door charger srt-8.

      1993 Camaro Z28
      2001 Camaro Z28
      1969 Camaro


    9. #9
      Join Date
      Mar 2007
      Location
      Denton, Texas
      Posts
      661
      I think of the BIG 3 the Challenger will be the best looking late model Muscle Car (over the Camaro & Mustang). the SRT version is going to be off the hook!
      ~Chris
      1973 Mustang SportsRoof
      1985 Camaro Z28 Totaled, 1985 Camaro Berlinetta SOLD, 1989 Camaro RS SOLD, 1985 Corvette SOLD, 1969 Camaro Pro-Street SOLD, 1955 Chevy PU 1st Series SOLD

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Dallas, Ga.
      Posts
      439
      4K is heavy, especially compared with what most of us here work with, but the new mustangs are well over 4 according to the owners I've talked with and I don't hear anyone saying near as much about mustang wieght as the Challenger.

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      Brampton, Ontario, CANADA !!
      Posts
      347
      The 05-up Mustang GT is ~3,600 lbs. The real porkers are the 07 Shelby GT-500 version, 3,900 for the coupe, and about 4,050 for the ragtop version. Good thing they have 500 hp and 500 torque!!


      cheers
      Ed N.
      Ed Nicholson
      73 VW Super Beetle "Sports Bug"
      95 Taurus SHO 5-speed -- new open-track beater

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Fort Worth, Tx
      Posts
      581
      Country Flag: United States
      Geez, how heavy are these things compared to their steel ancestors? Thought with all todays tech they'd be lighter fighters.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Jan 2006
      Location
      Dallas, Ga.
      Posts
      439
      I haven't investigated the advertised numbers since I'm really not interested in a late model mustang. The shop where I go for chassis dyno is called Pro-Speed in Powder Springs, Ga., they specialize in all model Mustangs and mostly on drag racing mid 80's up. These are the people who told me that the new style GT hardtops were exceeding 4K on the scales when they check them before doing any work (actual not advertised). I'm not trying to argue about it, just going by what I was told by a reputable shop that specializes in these cars. They did say that the previous body style before this one was around 3600, I was asking to compare with my car which comes in around 3600 also, '73 Camaro. If the info is wrong please excuse the mis-info.
      Blitz, I think by the time they hang enough equipment on the new cars to meet federal crash requirments and emissions standards, along with air bags etc., you probably have close to 1000lbs. that the older models didn't have to carry by federal law. JMO it may be something else.

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Nov 2006
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      151
      Quote Originally Posted by Blitz
      Geez, how heavy are these things compared to their steel ancestors? Thought with all todays tech they'd be lighter fighters.
      Yeah but you gotta take into account all the electronics, wider rims, alot more body to these cars.. but i agree.. with the aluminum engines and plastic bodies you'd think they'd be able to get these fat asses under 3500 atleast...
      98 Corvette-Z51, 6 speed, 346ci, shaved heads, z06 cam, straightpiped
      67 Camaro- soon to be completely overhauled!

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Ontario, Canada
      Posts
      2,314
      Country Flag: Canada
      I seem to remember the original Challengers being very heavy when compared to Mustangs and Camaros of the same era. They were, after all, built on a shortened Charger chassis, were they not?

      Ken
      If there is a hard way to do something, I'll find it!
      My other car is a Vega.

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      Colorado Springs
      Posts
      761
      First generation Challengers were 3200 to 3800 pounds depending on engine and option packages. Obviously, the most highly optioned RT/SE with a Hemi, like most 2008 versions will probably be, would be pretty at the heavy end of the scale.

    17. #17
      Join Date
      Feb 2006
      Location
      BC Canada
      Posts
      145
      I'm suprised too, that is pretty fat. Anyone know how much these things are gonna be? I want one.

    18. #18
      Join Date
      May 2007
      Location
      Midwest City, Ok
      Posts
      306
      I don't care how fat they are, they still look bad ass!!!

    19. #19
      Join Date
      Jan 2005
      Location
      Fort Worth, Tx
      Posts
      581
      Country Flag: United States
      Fat cars need love too.

    20. #20
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Hamilton, NJ
      Posts
      4,318
      Country Flag: United States


      Off to a rousing start! LOL
      Scott from NJ.

      Vent Windows Forever! ...

      Feather-light suspension, Konis just couldn't hold
      I'm so glad I took a look inside your showroom doors

    Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast



    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com