Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 10 of 10
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      Clarksville, TN
      Posts
      406
      Country Flag: United States

      Solid trans mount?

      Hopefully someone is up reading this tonight! I need some info on tranny mounts. I can solve a clearance issue if I run a solid mount at the back of my trans. A friend is telling me I shouldn't do it but I'm already running Moroso solid engine mounts and he has no reason for not doing it. He heard somewhere that it's bad news. Breaks the tail housing or something like that. If I need to run a non-solid mount I need to know so I can have the welder at work modify my crossmember tomorrow. My engine/tranny combo is a 396/T5.
      Thanks!!
      Matt



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Delaware, OH
      Posts
      1,379
      You can easily crack a tailhousing and even the bellhousing if you run a solid trans mount WITH rubber/poly motor mounts. The rule of thumb is either run all solid or all rubber/poly, never mix the two unless you like welding aluminum (don't ask me how I know this).

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Location
      Springfield, Mo.
      Posts
      443
      He is correct, i have also heard of 4th gen f-bodies wearing out their engine mounts and the stress of the engine setting crooked w/ the solid trans mount is enough to crack the tail housing with time & use
      Wayne
      1967 Camaro - Done!
      1968 Camaro - Underway

    4. #4
      Join Date
      May 2005
      Location
      Fontana, CA
      Posts
      4,960
      Country Flag: United States
      Solid trans mounts are never a good idea in a street car. I run Solid motor poly trans mounts. The rule of thumb has always been that the trans should be the same or softer than the motor mounts. Solid trans mounts are mot good even with solid motor mounts, the shock from hard shifting WILL lead to a case failure over time.
      Nick R.
      69 Camaro - 383, 700R4, 12 bolt 3.55, Hotchkis, Bilstein, Global West, Morris Classic
      08 HHR SS - Still Stock for now
      Do you still believe in all the things that you stood by before? Are you out there on the front lines, or at home keeping score?
      Do you care to be the layer of the bricks that seal your fate? Would you rather be the architect of what we might create?

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      Location
      USA
      Posts
      4,462
      Country Flag: United States
      I've got rubber motor mounts and a Poly trans mount on my '69 camaro.
      No problems yet.
      Jeff Tate
      U.S.A.
      "The best thing about participating in these events is that you get to hang out with a group of intelligent like minded people who live to achieve things in their lives. You won't find a lazy, mean, or dumb bone in their bodies." Bret Voelkel, RideTech

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Location
      Patterson, NY
      Posts
      784
      Solid trans mounts aren't a good idea on a street car, even if you've got solid motor mounts. The frame/chassis can flex under hard acceleration.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Delaware, OH
      Posts
      1,379
      I've never had a problem running solid motor with solid trans mounts, but that was always with an automatic. I could see where speed-shifting a manual trans would put more stress on everything.

      If you need to raise the tailshaft just a bit then just install a piece or two of drilled 2" flatbar between the trans and mount to raise it.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Location
      Clarksville, TN
      Posts
      406
      Country Flag: United States
      Thanks for the info everyone. I think I'll run a non-solid trans mount. Hey Dhardison, any good ideas on how to lower the trans about an inch? 69 camaro with the same trans mount you probably had in the Nova. Not the T400 trans crossmember but the other one. I'm thinking I'm gonna have to cut the upper center section out and then try to rebrace it.
      Thanks,
      Matt

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      Delaware, OH
      Posts
      1,379
      Quote Originally Posted by 2yellow69
      Thanks for the info everyone. I think I'll run a non-solid trans mount. Hey Dhardison, any good ideas on how to lower the trans about an inch? 69 camaro with the same trans mount you probably had in the Nova. Not the T400 trans crossmember but the other one. I'm thinking I'm gonna have to cut the upper center section out and then try to rebrace it.
      Thanks,
      Matt
      It's going to be tough to cut and try to keep any strength in that stamped steel crossmember (assuming I'm thinking of the same crossmember as you). You'd probably be better off picking up a tubular cm for a th400 or maybe the one that CC5S sells, then cutting and re-fabbing your own trans mount pad. Either that or Summit/Jeg's sell numerous universal trans crossmember mount kits.

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Jul 2006
      Location
      Northwestern NJ
      Posts
      342
      Quote Originally Posted by dhardison
      You can easily crack a tailhousing and even the bellhousing if you run a solid trans mount WITH rubber/poly motor mounts. The rule of thumb is either run all solid or all rubber/poly, never mix the two unless you like welding aluminum (don't ask me how I know this).
      The rule of thumb is NEVER run a solid tranny mount, period. The trans is NOT designed to be a stressed member.

      You should run poly or rubber trans mounts with solid engine mounts, or all rubber/poly.

      If you need to secure that end of the engine that much, something's wrong or you need to get a mid plate.

      Tommy


      Tommy Souren

      "The older I get, the faster I was."

      Grandma's 20k mile '80 Malibu Classic, in-progress factory style LS6 454, Legend LGT 700 5 speed, 9" 3.70 posi, Global West suspension, 12"/11" discs.




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com