Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 16 of 16
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Beacon Falls, Connecticut
      Posts
      239

      saturated or peak and hold

      now I understand the difference between the two;
      saturated injectors work by supplying voltage to the injector only durring the pulse width, and peak and hold supplies a nominal, low current to the inejctor all the time and then shoots to a high current durring the pulse width. from what i've read the peak and hold injectors turn on quicker, but it builds up heat in the ECU(?), and saturated injectors dissipate the heat through the injector.



      basically does that mean that a street car should have saturated injectors? Now that you can get both in high flow rates, that's not an issue. which ones did you guys choose.


    2. #2
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Posts
      43
      I think you are a little off. A peak and hold is typically a "4 to 1" style of injector driver, creating about 4A and then "holding" at 1A. Saturation maintains about 1A.

      You need a peak and hold driver in the ECU to run a low impedence injector corrrectly which most factory ECU's don't ahve and most aftermarket are.

      I would say a peak and hold driver and low imp. injector give you the best opening performance.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Beacon Falls, Connecticut
      Posts
      239
      maybe i didn't write it clearly enough, but I get how they work. But peak and hold puts a heavy burden on the injector driver, which is inside the ecm, now I've read this leads to a shorter lifespan of the computer with peak and hold , while getting quicker on/off of the injector, but with saturated it's safer for the ecm, but the injectors are much more sensitive to the duty cycle. now 1500-2000 for a new ecm vs 100 for injectors. if I'm not planning on pushing 9000 rpm (ie 6k or under) is the on/off time really going to make much of a difference? worth the risk to the computer.

      as an aside, I feel really dumb because going over the manualfor a couple ecms, you're right, they're all setup to run only peak and hold. so except as a talkign point, this subject is pretty moot. but thanks for replying.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Aug 2001
      Location
      Wilton, CA. (Sacramento)
      Posts
      2,995
      Country Flag: United States
      Just an FYI, Doug F is an EFI engineer for Holley, so you can pretty much take his stuff as gospel.

      Jody

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Beacon Falls, Connecticut
      Posts
      239
      noted

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      582
      Firstly, your ECU documentation should state what type of injectors it is compatible with, so that is your main driver. If it's designed for saturation injectors, you will damage your ecu by using P&H. Although it's sometimes possible to do the opposite, in the interest of not voiding your warranty i wouldn't do so without speaking to your ecu manufacturer.

      The latest and greatest saturation injectors (bosch, denso, delphi, keihin to name a few) are approaching P&H performance, but most of the old school saturation injectors commonly used in aftermarket applications don't fall under that since they're still milking a 20+ year old design, so in your context P&H do deliver the best overall performance.

      It depends on what your combination is, too. If it's pretty mild, you may not need the extra dynamic range that P&H gives you, so why pay the extra price?

      Basically, both types can be sized to to flow the same at max duty cycle. The difference is, if you're running a high HP (esp boosted) engine that requires large injectors, the P&H can potentially give you a smoother idle since they work better at lower pulsewidths.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Posts
      2,624
      Country Flag: United States
      [quote=Fuelie Fan]Firstly, your ECU documentation should state what type of injectors it is compatible with, so that is your main driver.quote]

      No pun intended, right?
      (I can't believe I just made an ECU joke.) Shoot, here come the nerd police!

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Beacon Falls, Connecticut
      Posts
      239
      I wanted to add one more question, and instead of starting a new thread, hopefully someone will jump in here. For fuel injector flow testing how long do they keep the injector open. using ohms law and some resistor math it's pretty easy to maintain a desired current, but I know keeping them open for too long can fry the injectors. I saw one place recommend 60 seconds, then measure the flowrate by catching fuel in a graduated cylinder, simple enough. But how long is too long, 30 seconds, 60, or must it be run the same as it is in an engine, at some desired pulsewidth? (the third seems unlikely, because the flow testing results I've seen do not have any pulse widths listed)

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Apr 2001
      Location
      The City of Fountains
      Posts
      16,117
      Country Flag: United States
      Flow testing is done at 100% duty cycle, in other words fully open. With the American rating of pounds/hour I would think 30 seconds is enough. Then multiply by 120 to get the per hour number.

      Andrew
      1970 GTO Version 3.0
      1967 Cougar build
      GM High-Tech Performance feature
      My YouTube Channel Please Subscribe!
      Instagram @dr__efi
      I deliver what EFI promises.
      Remote Holley EFI tuning.
      Please get in touch if I can be of service.

      "You were the gun, your voice was the trigger, your bravery was the barrel, your eyes were the bullets." ~ Her

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      582
      I always tried to keep all my testing between 30 seconds and 1 minute. On the bigger ones, sometimes my cylinder wasn't big enough to last even that long

      We did do full range testing to characterize low pulsewidth performance, but this isn't usually published. It's nothing crazy, pretty much what you're imagining. Our ecus had a special "constant Pulsewidth" mode, so by varying pulsewidth and or "rpm" we could hit any duty cycle we wanted. Add one graduated cylinder and one calibrated eye (me). The results were actually pretty repeatable.

      I'm sure bigger companies probably used flow meters, probably the scale type.

    11. #11
      Join Date
      Dec 2006
      Posts
      43
      The typical stands let you program in a pulsewidth. As mentioned I usually check at low pulsewidth (idle) and medium and static to make sure the whole range of the injectors are pretty consistent.

    12. #12
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      maryland
      Posts
      160
      Country Flag: United States
      if you need to run injectors big enough to need to be low-impedance and have a saturated type ecm, you can use a variety of aftermarket boxes that take the signal from your ecm but run p/h squirters.
      if i recall, even holley offers one.

    13. #13
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Beacon Falls, Connecticut
      Posts
      239
      and an easier way than that, is to do what the OEMs do. In order to run the low impedance P/H injectors on a saturated system they stick a resistor box in series with the injectors. I know DSM's, 3000gt's and 300zx's do this.

    14. #14
      Join Date
      Oct 2004
      Location
      maryland
      Posts
      160
      Country Flag: United States
      not as precise, more load on ecm, changes opening/closing slew rates.

    15. #15
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      582
      Yeah I wouldn't do that unless I was in a bind. I never tested it, but i can very easily imagine the faster open/close rates going right out the window since you've cut the current running to the injector. In fact, I'd be surprised if they worked well at all. I know from testing that saturation injectors start to degrade (in performance, not physically) when you reduce the voltage to them, and i expect the same would happen here.

    16. #16
      Join Date
      Aug 2004
      Posts
      582
      oops double post




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com