Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 5 of 5

    Threaded View

    1. #3
      Join Date
      Apr 2003
      Location
      Central Valley, CA
      Posts
      910
      Country Flag: United States
      Yes, charge air path cross section is the same. For almost identical charge air cross sectional area, the Bell cores are rated much more conservatively than Spearco's.

      I talked with Gerhard Schruf at Bell Intercoolers today (co-owner/engineer with Corky Bell) and got everything figured out in 5 minutes. I'm finalizing my end tank & tubing designs this weekend and ordering next week. Bell says they can build my design and ship in 3-5 days. Yay!

      I'm going with a 28" x 3" core (charge air cross section) in either 8" or 10" high. Gerhard said even 6" core height would be plenty given my reasonable discharge air temps but more height will aid in efficiency especially on those 100-110F summer days and the additional height gives up almost nothing in terms of pumping losses through the core.

      Now all I need to do is take a sawzall to my radiator support between the headlights, lose my center hood latch, and rebuild from there.


      1969 Chevelle
      Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
      In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.





    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com