Results 1 to 17 of 17
Thread: LS1 or LS2?
-
04-18-2006 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Las Vegas
- Posts
- 25
LS1 or LS2?
So I have been debating between swapping an LS1 or an LS2 into my '70 Chevelle. Either one I choose will get a Magnacharger roots type blower on it for an extra kick. By looking at the prices, the LS2 is not that much more expensive than the LS1 out of the box, so why does everybody go LS1? Is there a lot more hastle when installing the LS2? Can the T-56 hook up to either one? So far I am leaning towards the LS2, but then again, I have just started my research.
1970 Chevrolet Chevelle
Pro Touring Project
Funded by me, built by ATS.


-
04-18-2006 #2Well, you know my choice would be to buy a used ls1, tear it down and put forged pistons and good rods in it. Custom fab a twin turbo setup. Then have a 1000 hp pumpgas street car! But that is just me!
If you want new, go ls2, if you want used, an Ls1 can be had for $2500.Twin Turbo Ls1 '71 Chevelle
93 octane 1000 hp street car!!
04-18-2006 #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Las Vegas
- Posts
- 25
I would rather go new instead of used. Also I want streetable power and 1000hp isn't streetable lol. I also wanted to kind of stay along the lines of classic muscle car and to me, turbos aren't classic muscle car, whereas roots type blowers are more along the lines of that. I do love TTs though, I twin turboed my 350Z and can't get enough of it!
1970 Chevrolet Chevelle
Pro Touring Project
Funded by me, built by ATS.


04-18-2006 #41000 horse street cars aren't for everybody,we all have our own idea of streetable,by streetable you mean daily driveable.my new combo is 1100 hp and i've drive it everyday this week.anyway
most guys don't just by a used engine and throw it right in,most freshen it up first,change cam's etc.which is a lot cheaper than buying a new engine,such as a ls2.and really there's not that much differnce in the 2.change cams in a ls1 and you are maying ls2 power,change cam's and port in a ls2 and you really close ls7 power.
04-19-2006 #5Keep in mind with a 1000+ hp motor with turbos, it is 100% reliable as far as driveability. I can go cross country all day long! When I am not in boost(normal driving) it is basically a stock GM LS1 engine just like every truck camaro and vette that is a daily driver. Obviosly when boosting to 1000 hp, anything can happen and traction is a concern. It sure is easy to pass minivans though!
You will be real happy with a LS2, Or ls1 for that matter.Twin Turbo Ls1 '71 Chevelle
93 octane 1000 hp street car!!
05-29-2006 #6
New to Pro-Touring
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 35
The LS2 is barely different than the LS1 overall. It is (as far as I know) superior as far as power production goes. The extra cubes DO make a difference.Another benefit is the fact that the 4" bore used to increase displacement helps unshroud valves increasing flow into the engine.
Now with the adaptors readily available for the reluctor wheel,the Knock sensors on the LS2 there is no reason to use an LS1 except for cost and availability.It doesn't seem like those two problems are problems for you at all.
I just got rid of my 1998 Trans Am that ran a best of 10.92@124 and was daily driven.All factory conveniences retained and the engine was STOCK shortblock. I had some Patriot heads,STOCK 98 LS1 cam,LS6 intake,NX nitrous,walbro pump,TCI converter in a stock 4l60e All tuning of the factory ECM done by me with HPtuners and a stock rear with a stock suspension all riding on 255/16 BFG DRs. Yes,I used a good deal of nitrous and the converter was fairly loose
IF I had kept it I would be sticking an LS2 based motor in place of the LS1 into it.The benefits of the 4" bore are hard to argue with.
05-29-2006 #7
Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Dunwoody, GA
- Posts
- 4,984



Reply With Quote