Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: 400 or ls2??
-
02-09-2006 #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Snohomish, Washington
- Posts
- 2,235
400 or ls2??
hi, i have a 67 GTO and i was thinking about maybe doing a ls2 but im not sure yet. i dont know if i should keep and use my 400 or get an ls2 and supercharge that. what are some pros and cons for the ls2? and same with the 400.
thanks
Matt
-
02-09-2006 #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Anaheim Hills, CA
- Posts
- 11,967
The 400 would be more cool since few people actually do up the original mill, but the LS2 is the better engine
The only con for the LS2 is cost of the retrofit. It wins in every other area (IMO)"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."
1968 Track Rat Camaro:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGHJ5c1yLIo&t=2s
1971 Chevelle Wagon with a few mods:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBVPR3sRgyU
02-09-2006 #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Snohomish, Washington
- Posts
- 2,235
hmm ok after looking into it i think im going to use my 400 it would be cheaper to use since im hopefully going to pick up a car this saturday, and i think im going to use jim butler parts.
Matt
Reply With Quote
