Enter your username:
Do you want to login or register?
  • Forgot your password?

    Login / Register




    Results 1 to 6 of 6

    Thread: Flat Vs. Roller

    Hybrid View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      New Washington, IN
      Posts
      1,510

      Flat Vs. Roller

      WHat differences would I get between a flat tappet solid lift cam and a solid roller cam?

      What would the real world differences in powerband, peak numbers, etc,

      Here are the two that I am looking at,

      Comp soild flat tappet 51-246-4 Grind number 294S

      Solid, Rough Idle, need higher compression ratio. MAximum street Preformance. USe 300 stall and low gear.

      Valve setting .022 Rpm Range 2500-6500

      Duration @ .050 248 / 248 lift .525" / .525"

      Lobe seperation angle 110

      Comp Soild Roller 51-751-9 Grind Number 288R

      Mechanical Roller, Choppy idle, broad power range, increased compression advised with 3000 stall, headers, and lower gears.

      Valve setting .020 Rpm range 2200-6500

      Duration @ .050 244 / 244 lift .550" / .550"

      Lobe seperation angle, 110


      Would the rooler cam make enough difference to justify its cost?

      This would be going in a Pontiac 400, with 9.5:1 compression, edelbrock heads, PRM intake, headers, etc..

      5 speed with 3.73 gears.



    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Posts
      130
      The roller has less overall duration so it will idle better plus it will make more TQ. You can also make more power because of the higher lift. Add in that you are not going to wipe out a cam lobe if the block isin't perfect.

      I would probably go smaller on the roller than that and add a little more lift.... only problem is you can't go too crazy in a Poncho block with roller cams without hurting the block.

      Bret
      Bauer Racing Engines
      Specializing in late model GM motors

      1964 GTO (work in progress for 13 years)
      600 HP 365 cube SBC
      C5 Front Suspension
      Satchel Link Rear
      T56
      Not gettin done anytime soon

      2000 Camaro SS SCCA FS Car
      Koni Adjustables
      35mm Front Bar
      DOT Race tires....

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      New Washington, IN
      Posts
      1,510
      Thanks, so what kind of hp or tq increase whould you think? Is it going to be worth the $300 more?

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Sep 2002
      Location
      San Jose, CA
      Posts
      1,793
      A roller cam is better from several standpoints. Peak HP numbers may not be drastically different, but the powerband will be much wider.
      Also, I believe the Pontiac motors suffer from similar cam oiling problems as the BBC (I'm not Mr Pontiac by any means), if this is true a roller cam will have much better longevity than its flat tappet cousins.
      I suggest you consider a cam with a a little extra duration on the exhaust side, 5-10 degree's max. I know the Pontiac has a poor flowing center exhaust port, and the extra exhaust duration will help counter act this.
      1971 Camaro, 383 stroker ~500HP,M21 Trans with lightened flywheel. All Sorts of Auto-x Goodness in the Suspension. 12" Brakes ->SOLD

      But ask me about my 2004 STi Auto-x car...

      Just call me Brett

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Aug 2003
      Location
      Orlando, FL
      Posts
      8,745
      The problem I see with both of these cams is they will make power north of the Poncho safetly zone of 5500 to 5800. The skeleton lifter valleys are VERY weak, and hate lots of lift (although a roller will help this stress), but the motor masically hates RPMs, so make it a torque monster.

      For Pontiacs, I have become very confident with Jm Butler performance

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Oct 2005
      Location
      New Washington, IN
      Posts
      1,510
      The roller listed here, is actually smaller than any listed on Butlers site!




    Advertise on Pro-Touring.com